User talk:Nusrah02

August 2016
Hello, I'm Mayur. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Krishnadasi (2016 TV series)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mayur (talk•Email) 16:58, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

Though I'm sure you mean well, Nusrah, per WP:TVPLOT the plot section should not exceed 500 words and should only present a general overview of the series' plot. The Plot section is also already flagged as in need of cleanup for being too long and overly-detailed. Your additions put us in the 2300 word range, which is almost 5 times the maximum length. For these reasons, the content has been cut. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:13, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

WP:TVPLOT
Hi there, It's nothing personal, but I've had to revert the recent changes you made to the plot section at Krishnadasi (2016 TV series). Per WP:TVPLOT, we're supposed to be providing a general overview of the series, not focusing on rehashing individual episode details and there are copyright concerns when we start delivering excessive detail in plot summaries. The section is already flagged as being too long, and it really needs to be chopped down to 500 words. By contrast, the content you added lengthened the section by 338 words. If you can figure out a way to describe the general series arc in 500 words, please do! Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:53, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

Interpretive labels and parentheticals
Hi again, please avoid adding odd interpretive labels like "2nd main female lead" as you did at Swaragini - Jodein Rishton Ke Sur. It seems like you are personally deciding who each lead character is, and nowhere else in television articles do we break down cast by 1st and 2nd "main lead". See also WP:ANTAGONIST, which discourages us from using interpretive labels like "hero, villain, antagonist, protagonist". There are also issues of redundancy. If cast were ordered by their onscreen credits, it would be more obvious who the "leads" are. We also don't need to be told who is a male and who is a female. That is presumably very easy to tell by looking at a person.

Additionally, your usage of parentheticals here is excessive. Parentheticals are very rarely the best choice for delivering information. The content you added should be included using normal punctuation, like here, where I simplified the content by using commas. Excessive parentheticals make the content look sloppy and amateurish. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:44, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

Sloppy parentheticals again
These changes do not appear constructive to me. It's unclear why you are using amateurish parentheticals to communicate information that could better be presented in clean prose. Since you haven't discussed the matter or achieved consensus, it's impossible for me to understand your rationale. Please do not restore this formatting without first achieving consensus, as it is disruptive. Maybe you've never seen a quality TV article? Please take a look at Firefly (TV series), which is a Wikipedia Featured Article. Featured Articles tend to represent the highest quality of article at Wikipedia. Notice in the cast section how we have reasonably detailed character descriptions written in complete sentences? Notice how there are no parentheticals? We should be presenting content in complete sentences, not as small facts crammed into parentheses and slapped haphazardly into articles. Note also Fringe (TV series). While there are some parentheticals in the character list, they are used sparingly, and only for information that can be quickly communicated without the need for prose. The rest of the information, like relationships between characters, and so forth, are presented in complete thoughts. Please bring the articles you edit up to these standards. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:14, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

This doesn't appear to be constructive either. You've removed prose in favor of a parenthetical, you've added ambiguous phrasing "Aradhya's family friend and police officer" which suggests the character is the family's personal police officer, you've removed character details without explanation and clarify templates without resolving the issues. Not sure what your deal is, but if you don't start discussing your changes, your editing privileges will be interrupted. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:48, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

October 2016
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

I noticed your recent edit to Kasam Tere Pyaar Ki does not have an edit summary.&#32;Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! - Mlpearc  ( open channel ) 01:09, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Kasam Tere Pyaar Ki. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. ''Diff: Unexplained reordering of cast, removal of real-world information about cast replacement contravening WP:TVCAST, introduction of sloppy parentheticals, removal of maintenance templates without resolving the issues or explaining why you removed the templates. I can only assume you've never seen what a cast list is supposed to look like. See List of Millennium characters. You will notice that it looks vastly different from the sub-standard version you seem to prefer.'' Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:37, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

February 2017
Hello, I'm RileyBugz. I noticed that in this edit to Ishqbaaaz, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. RileyBugz Yell at me &#124; Edits  17:43, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Unexplained reordering of cast
Hi, as previously noted, please stop arbitrarily reordering cast lists as you've done here. This looks totally arbitrary, as if you're simply entertaining a personal preference for one actor over another. Totally pointless. If there's some rhyme or reason behind this, go to the talk page and explain, please. But resubmitting the arbitrary change will be considered disruptive. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:57, 9 February 2017 (UTC)