User talk:Nutanthakurlko

Speedy deletion nomination of Amitabh thakur


A tag has been placed on Amitabh thakur requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Woogee (talk) 04:41, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Amitabh thakur
I have nominated Amitabh thakur, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Amitabh thakur. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Rd232 talk 23:36, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Repost of Amitabh Thakur
A tag has been placed on requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template hang on underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. Top Jim (talk) 15:12, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Welcome
Hello, Nutanthakurlko, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I notice that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been reverted for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of deletion, you might like to draft your article before submission, then ask me or any other editor to proofread it. To start creating a draft article, just click your user name at the top of the screen when you are logged in, and edit that page as you would any other. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

The one firm rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. It is also worth noting that Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which specifically link them to one company or corporation. If your username does have such a name, it would be advisable for you to request a change of username.

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! You can also just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Top Jim (talk) 15:17, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Please do not post articles from other non-English projects to the English Wikipedia. Thank you. PMDrive1061 (talk) 16:08, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

December 2010
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Ckatz chat spy  18:01, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

Welcome
Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!) ''' Hello, Nutanthakurlko, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:
 * Be Bold!
 * Learn from others
 * Be kind to others
 * Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
 * Tell us a bit about yourself
 * Our great guide to Wikipedia

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

We're so glad you're here! MikeLynch (talk) 05:35, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Corporate Social Responsibility, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ''I am sorry Dr. Nutan, blogs cannot be used as references. Please refer WP:RS. Hope you have a good time here. Welcome to Wikipedia, and have a happy time editing! '' MikeLynch (talk) 05:37, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Please stop, as your editing is becoming disruptive. While you may feel that the subject material is worthy of inclusion, you have a direct conflict of interest and must avoid making such editorial decisions. You need to instead present your justifications on article talk pages and allow third party editors with no connection to the subject to make a neutral assessment of your material. Unfortunately, if you continue to use Wikipedia to promote your actions or those of people close to you, you may lose your editing privileges. Ckatz chat spy  09:50, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

thanks a lot Mr Ckatz. I never though I was doing a disruptive editing. Yes, I think u r correct when u say that I shall "instead present your justifications on article talk pages and allow third party editors with no connection to the subject to make a neutral assessment of your material". I will keep this in mind. Both the issues about Amitabh Thakur's definition of CSR and his newer concept of CSR are very important and path breaking. Similarly, his work of Facebook Book is also of a newer kind, but then I will present them on their respective talk page instead of direct aditing. Thanks a lot once again. nutanthakurlkoNutanthakurlko (talk) 10:29, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

Your relationship to other editors
Hello, Nutanthakurlko. Another editor has suggested, on the basis of similarities in editing history, that you and the users Addyboss, Luckkann, Chotusardar and Tannuwriter may have a close connection to one another. I wonder if you can say whether you do have a connection with these other editors, and if so what that relationship is? I would be very grateful if you would do so. JamesBWatson (talk) 18:34, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of National RTI Forum for deletion
The article National RTI Forum is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/National RTI Forum until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  The Mi ke  •Wassup doc?  15:51, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

Friends, about my relations with the users Addyboss, Luckkann, Chotusardar and Tannuwriter, I would like to state that they are related to me as close friends and blood relatives but I assure you that they will never again be involved in any editing related with me, my husband Amitabh Thakur and others with Conflict of Interest, beyond one which would be simply presenting facts for assistance of Wikipedia. nuutanthakurlkoNutanthakurlko (talk) 01:08, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Glad to see you are quite frank about this. You might also want to read a section on meatpuppetry.  Yes Michael? •Talk 06:34, 3 April 2011 (UTC)