User talk:Nutball5000

July 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Carrie (2013 film), please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 05:43, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 25
Hi. When you recently edited Carrie (2013 film), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages William MacDonald and Christopher Britton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:48, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Carrie (2013 film)
Look at the source I provided--the character's name is Desjardin, not Collins. Don't restore it until you can provide a source that the character's name is Miss Collins. HangingCurveSwing for the fence 23:21, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

August 2012
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Carrie (2013 film). Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. HangingCurveSwing for the fence 12:44, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

And again, you persist in changing this without providing a source. Take this to the talk page before reverting again, and provide a source, or else I may have to bring an administrator in. HangingCurveSwing for the fence 12:53, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Scary Movie (film series) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Child's Play


 * Wrong Turn (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Copycat

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:39, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

September 2012
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Carrie (1976 film). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 15:52, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Rage: Carrie 2 (2012 film)


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as The Rage: Carrie 2 (2012 film), is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --EclecticEnnui (talk) 02:46, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Texas Chainsaw 3D, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Elizium23 (talk) 03:59, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. – Connormah (talk) 05:06, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dan Yeager
Hello, Nutball5000. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Dan Yeager, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Dan Yeager to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, LeSnail (talk) 04:47, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Detention (2010 film)
Hello Nutball5000,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Detention (2010 film) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Alanl (talk) 17:53, 26 September 2012 (UTC)


 * As reviewing administrator, I can tell you it will not be speedy deleted, because we don't speedy delete films, something the new editor above did not realize. But it does need additional information to stay in Wikipedia--We do not consider IMdB a sufficient source.  I advise you to add more very quickly, before the article gets nominated for deletion by a regular deletion process.   DGG ( talk ) 01:01, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Do You Wanna Know a Secret?, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Copycat (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Final (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Julin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:41, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Paranormal Entity, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Copycat (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Ghost Attack on Sutton Street: Poltergeists and Paranormal Entities for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ghost Attack on Sutton Street: Poltergeists and Paranormal Entities is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghost Attack on Sutton Street: Poltergeists and Paranormal Entities until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 13:23, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

November 2012
Hello, I'm Tbhotch. I noticed that you recently made an edit to Texas Chainsaw 3D that seemed to be a test. Your test worked! If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Tb hotch .™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions.  06:50, 25 November 2012 (UTC)


 * [[Image:Ambox warning pn.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Texas Chainsaw 3D. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to a loss of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox.    BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  06:52, 25 November 2012 (UTC)


 * [[Image:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Please do not add or change content, as you did to Texas Chainsaw 3D, without verifying it by citing reliable sources. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Specifically, there is no reliable source for the name "Kenny".   BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  07:02, 25 November 2012 (UTC)


 * [[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|alt=|link=]] This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Texas Chainsaw 3D, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.    BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  00:28, 26 November 2012 (UTC)


 * What I think you're adding is from a source that talk about plot details and mentions the name "Kenny". Unfortunately, there is no source that attributes that name to that actor and to do so ourselves would be original research and that is not allowed.   BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  00:47, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

December 2012
Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Wrong Turn 5: Bloodlines without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Jim1138 (talk) 06:11, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Suicide of Dawn-Marie Wesley does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! ''It was a good edit, but an edit summary would have made it even better. Please get into the habit :)'' Fiddle Faddle (talk) 22:43, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Detention (2010 film)


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Detention (2010 film) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Robotdude101 (talk) 22:48, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Leprechaun (franchise), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Horror (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:14, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bundy: An American Icon


The article Bundy: An American Icon has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * The article does not cite any sources and does not claim notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Noiratsi (talk) 09:22, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

January 2013
Hello, I'm Timtrent. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Suicide of Dawn-Marie Wesley, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 20:05, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Texas Chainsaw
The sequel talk is on The Texas Chainsaw Massacre (franchise). That's where it belongs.  BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  20:32, 12 January 2013 (UTC)


 * I'm starting to lose the assumption of good faith here, because you're ignoring direct comments about not including sequel talk when it's already on the franchise page.   BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  20:56, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Carrie (2013 film)
Hi. Welcome to Wikipedia, and thanks for working to improve the site with your edit to Carrie (2013 film), as we really appreciate your participation. However, the edit had to be reverted, because Wikipedia cannot accept unsourced material or original research. This includes material lacking cited sources, or obtained through personal knowledge or unpublished synthesis of previously published material. Wikipedia requires that the material in its articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable (usually secondary) sources explicitly cited in the text in the form of an inline citation, which you can learn to make here. If you ever have any other questions about editing, or need help regarding the site's policies, just let me know by leaving a message for me in a new section at the bottom of my talk page. Thanks. :-) Nightscream (talk) 02:19, 2 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Do not place notes in Wikipedia articles, as you did with this edit to Carrie (2013 film), as this could be construed as vandalism. Wikipedia articles are not a forum for discussion. That is what talk pages are for. As for your question, it is explained in the message just above this one. If you have any other questions or need help regarding Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, feel free to ask, and I'd be happy to help you. Thank you. Nightscream (talk) 13:25, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you make disruptive edits to an article, as you did when you removed citations and added unsourced material with these edits to Carrie (2013), you will be blocked from editing. Nightscream (talk) 16:07, 8 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Didn't you read my first message to you above? If you did, and if you bothered to familiarize yourself with the policies and guidelines I linked to in that message, then you should know which policies or guidelines your edits violated.


 * Material is unsourced when it is not indicated, usually in the form in an inline citation that accompanies the material, where it came from. Did you add such citations along with your additions? No, you did not. Hence, the material you added was unsourced. Material is not sourced when you tell another editor on their talk page where it came from. It's sourced when the source is explicitly indicated in the article.


 * Moreover, you actually removed the eight citations that accompanied the six cast members already listed in that section. Why in the world would you do this?


 * As for IMDB, websites whose content is user-generated content, such including IMDB, are not reliable under WP:USERG, which is part of Wikipedia's Reliable Sources policy.


 * Feel free to ask me any other questions about the site's editing policies when the need arises. And thanks for the baklava. :-) Nightscream (talk) 22:49, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistent disruptive edits, and ignoring repeated warnings and a past block, the most recent violation being these edits to Carrie (2013 film). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Nightscream (talk) 22:25, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with your edits to this edit to Carrie (2013). The source cited for that passage does not indicate that the character played by Gabriella Wilde is friends with the main character at all, let alone that they are "best" friends. In fact, the source states that the character played by Wilde is among Carrie's bullies, and later takes pity on her.

In addition, you have also added other unsourced material with your edits to Chris Hargensen, Rita Desjardin, Sue Snell, Tommy Ross, Margaret White, Carrie White, and you seem to be also engaging in edits could be construed as vandalism, such as your edits to Student Bodies and The Rage 2: Carrie.

In addition, sites with user-generated content, such as wikis, are not considered reliable under WP:USERG, because anyone can edit those.

If you continue add unsourced material to articles (and I already linked you above to pages that show you how to create citations) or make other disruptive edits, you risk being blocked again. Please do not make that necessary. Nightscream (talk) 02:23, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent addition of unsourced material to articles, and ignoring repeated warnings and two past blocks, the most recent violation being this edit to Carrie (2013 film). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Nightscream (talk) 12:41, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

8213: Gacy House and Anneliese: The Exorcist Tapes
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 8213: Gacy House, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Copycat (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 01:52, 17 April 2013 (UTC)


 * I'm not sure what you mean by "outline", but I haven't seen either of those films, so I'm not familiar with them. But if there's anything else i can help you with, let me know. Nightscream (talk) 14:06, 17 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Perhaps I'm misunderstanding what you mean by "write out the entire movies". What exactly is it that you're asking me to write?


 * Also, messages that are part of a single conversation are generally kept under the same heading. You don't have to create a new heading for each message, or include it in a baklava banner. I appreciate it, but with all the baklava you're giving me, I'm gonna get terminal diabetes! :-) Nightscream (talk) 00:16, 18 April 2013 (UTC)


 * How can I write out the synopsis of a film that I haven't seen?


 * And again, can you please dispense with the banners, and just keep the messages simple and under the same heading? A banner once in a while is okay, but every single message it's overkill. Thanks, I really appreciate it. Nightscream (talk) 00:36, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Can you please stop making new section headings for each new message, and dispense with the banners? Nightscream (talk) 02:01, 18 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Nutball5000, when you want to leave a message in particular discussion, you just go to that discussion, and click the "edit" button on the right side of that heading, and then leave the message at the bottom of that discussion.


 * I haven't seen either of those films, and have no intention of doing so. If you care that much about those articles, then be bold, and add synopses to them. Nightscream (talk) 04:18, 18 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Please stop adding new section headings and banners to my talk page. I informed you above of how to leave talk page messages without doing this, and yet you continue to do it anyway, leading me to wonder if you are being deliberately tendentious. If you want me to help you with advice on those articles, then please acknowledge my instructions on proper talk page etiquette. You can also read WP:TALK and Help:Editing, as they might help. But if you continue to leave these banners on my talk page, I will have my talk page protected from further edits, and be forced to contact another admin regarding your behavior. Please do not make that necessary.


 * I will state this one more time only: When you want to participate in a given discussion thread, go to the top of that thread, where the heading is, click the "edit" button next to it, then scroll to the bottom of the thread, and leave your message there, making sure to sign your message by typing four tildes (~) at the end of it, which will also automatically timestamp it. To make each editor's messages distinct at a glance, you can indent your message one space to the right by putting a colon in front of the paragraphs, much as I have done here. Each added colon indents the paragraph one more space to the right.


 * According to WP:FILMPLOT, WP:TVPLOT, et al., works such as movies, books, TV episodes, etc. are their own primary sources for their content, so things like credits and synopses for works that have been released do not require inline citations, since it is presumed that the editors who write them simply based the synopses on the film itself. However, when you do need to make inline citations, you can learn to do so here. I actually explained this to you, and provided related links for this, in my message to you above in the Carrie (2013 film) section. Nightscream (talk) 04:34, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

June 2014
Hello, I'm Excirial. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to The Kings of Appletown, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs ) 17:55, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User:Excirial. Jackmcbarn (talk) 17:58, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for attempting to harass other users, as you did at User:Excirial. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 18:00, 16 June 2014 (UTC)