User talk:Nuts588

July 2019
Hello, I'm Red Phoenix. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Pete Buttigieg— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Red Phoenix talk  21:07, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pete Buttigieg. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Braxton C. Womacktalk to me! 21:10, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

August 2019
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Pete Buttigieg. &#8211; MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 22:46, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
 * This is not a "commonly used nickname without the right-wing community" and we don't add WP:POLEMIC material to talk pages. &#8211;  MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 22:50, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 00:16, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

How to get unblocked???
How?

unblock discussion

 * Edits such as this and this might lead one to doubt that you are here to contribute in good faith. Paul Erik  (talk) (contribs) 00:18, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
 * You also encouraged another user to keep up the good work. In normal contexts, this is fine. However, you cited this edit specifically despite another editor clearly indicating that was vandalism. &#8211; MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 00:22, 2 August 2019 (UTC)


 * LOoks like you have understated the problem. I would consider unblocking you with a WP:topic ban on post-1932 US politics, broadly construed. Please describe what constructive edits you wpuld make instead. Seeking discussion from other admins. Or unblock as you see fit. Not a formal decline.-- Dloh cier ekim  (talk) 01:10, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Talk pages are for discussing improvements to articles. Not whatever it was you were doing.-- Dloh cier ekim  (talk) 01:12, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
 * I'll be honest and say I'm morbidly curious what would happen if this user was given any more WP:ROPE. &#8211; MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 01:18, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Curiously, I was going to say curious username. And, no we need no more rope. It's constructive edits moving forward or nill.-- Dloh cier ekim  (talk) 01:20, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Nuts566

This was a previous account. Did not know how to appeal that so I sort of raged with this account. My apologies — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nuts588 (talk • contribs) 01:27, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
 * +1 point for honestyEven if a majority of your edits on that account are reprehensible. It's ~ not btw. &#8211;  MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 01:41, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you for being so honest. Regrettably, I see you had a chance to start afresh and have again been blocked. You will need to address those problems as well.-- Dloh cier ekim  (talk) 01:48, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

That last account was blocked over 18 months ago with no means that I knew of repealing that. Reason for that is the same as reason for current. Trolling concerning controversial political figures/issues. Which I was wrong to do. Mostly, I see a systemic bias on wikipedia that seems to edit right leaning toned articles in favor of left leaning and therefore WP:Neutral being void. I see that it is a rather poor way to protest this. Nuts588 (talk) 02:02, 2 August 2019 (UTC) TBH, I had him on ignore after I declined. One day I need to ask for that shiny CU button. Missed the "systemic bias" thing.Pushes the discussion overto NOTHERE (troll)-- Dloh cier ekim  (talk) 02:23, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Yeah, you struck a real blow for objectivity with this edit. And your gay-hating comments, also really insightful. User:Dlohcierekim et al., why are we indulging this? I'm CU-blocking this sad little troll because he's also been trolling without logging in (making the same edits), and I'm revoking TPA since this is a waste of electrons. Systemic bias my ass. Drmies (talk) 02:10, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
 * User:Dlohcierekim, I'll support that request. It helps, sometimes, with people like this. Drmies (talk) 02:26, 2 August 2019 (UTC)