User talk:Nwohasun

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing. Additionally, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for your contributions to Wikipedia, you must disclose who is paying you to edit.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block. To do so, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the text at the bottom of your talk page, replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason for thinking that the block was an error, and publish the page. Alexf(talk) 14:35, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

globally renamed Mouthcaretech to Nwohasun
globally renamed Mouthcaretech to Nwohasun   Dlohcierekim (talk) 18:53, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

unblock discussion
OK to unblock  Dlohcierekim (talk) 18:53, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

https://mouthcaretech.com 18:58, 16 July 2019 (UTC) Please have i been unblocked?
 * Why are you still linking to that inappropriate website?!? If unblocked, would you link to that website? Would you link to any other website for which you have a conflict of interest? Can you explain why that website is inappropriate? Hint: WP:COI, WP:RS. --Yamla (talk) 19:11, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

No. Not ok. The user came in with a company name and spammed said company. The instructions above clearly state that to be unblocked s/he must
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

I do not see that being done yet. Agree with Yamla's comments. First edit made is more spam. Let's hear from the user first on what they plan to do. -- Alexf(talk) 19:33, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Ouch. I did not see the link spam. To be unblocked, you must agree to not edit about or link to that. Other conditions may apply.  Dlohcierekim (talk) 19:36, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
 * I still don't see the dif, but know I see the link here, so . . . .  Dlohcierekim (talk) 19:38, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Nwohasun (talk) 20:28, 16 July 2019 (UTC)i have seen where i got it all wrong. i have cleared the link off my profile (signature). actually, the link is my website address, it was not intended for spam purposes.

i clearly do understand how things are done here now and from now hence forth, i shall desist from editing and contributing to articles here until i have learnt my rope here.

please unblock my account and my url. Let's see how it goes.

i never intended on starting on the wrong foot sir. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nwohasun (talk • contribs) 20:28, 16 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Based on this account's contribs, deleted contribs, and filter log, I don't see any spamming activity. Where has this account "been used for advertising or promotion"? Based on the rename, I'm inclined to unblock immediately. ST47 (talk) 20:30, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
 * So long as they agree to not link to or edit about mouthcaretech.com, then I'd be happy. If you read carefully, you see they still have not agreed to that. In fact, they added it above.   Dlohcierekim (talk) 20:35, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
 * I can see that the web link was their sig. A novel approach. They do say they fixed it.  Dlohcierekim (talk) 20:36, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
 * (ec)It appears that they had previously set that in their signature, and have now fixed that. But, we can wait for their confirmation. ST47 (talk) 20:38, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Nwohasun (talk) 20:43, 16 July 2019 (UTC) i do hereby confirm of removing my web address from my signature. i have also changed my username. what else do you want me to do? i am open to ideas. i still insist that i did not mean to spam this place. if there are other things you want me to know, kindly state it please
 * For me, affirming that you won't edit about or link to your website would suffice. Other conditions may apply.  Dlohcierekim (talk) 20:48, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Nwohasun (talk) 20:54, 16 July 2019 (UTC) i affirm it will not happen again sir. we have been on this for so long.. is there any indications stating otherwise? just unblock me and the url. then you can delete my account if you wish. thanks

Not at all understanding the part about unblocking the URL. Do you mean your IP? Dlohcierekim (talk) 20:56, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Nwohasun (talk) 21:02, 16 July 2019 (UTC) whatever the restriction is, please unblock. this is emotionally draining and tiresome. i just want to do the right thing that's all.