User talk:Nwsmith3228

Hello, Nwsmith3228 here! Resident on the west-coast, midwest, and New York City...and spend time in each for work. Great to be part of the community! Nwsmith3228 (talk) 15:31, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Charlie Albright Revert Discussion
I recently posted on the user page of user user:binksternet about some POV edits that he seems to be doing to both my previous edit and other users (sourced IP material and user:jdanieloh.

It seems that user:binksternet undoes almost all edits and additions other than that of his own with general explanations such as: "prose not suitable for encyclopedia. Albright is not known for being a composer, though he certainly has composed."

This is clearly untrue to anyone who simply reads the additions that I made, which are undeniably neutral and well-sourced.

Recent Issues: 1) user:binksternet reverted my edit and all edits by other sourced IP and usernamed individuals who add "composer" to his title, claiming that "Albright is not known for being a composer." This is easily refuted by my recent article which discusses Albright as a composer.  user:binksternet clearly did not take the time to read the article or do background research on the thousands of articles on Charlie Albright that are primary sources to his compositions and compositional ability.

2) user:binksternet reverted the addition of an additional review that was significant in that it discussed not only Albright's technical and emotional ability at the piano, but also that a) he transcends that and to only consider those two things would be to miss his greater ability and b) it discussed his compositional abilities in a primary source.

It would be appreciated if user:binksternet did not introduce his personal point of view (POV) into articles, but instead took the time to do significant research if he decides to revert all others' edits and additions with blatantly general explanations that are insufficient.

Nwsmith3228, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
 The Adventure