User talk:Nwwaew/Archive 4

This is the fourth archive for my talk page. All messages that currently do not require my attention are moved here by me when the issue is resolved.

If you want to bring up a message from the past, please create a new section with the message copied from the archive. Thanks!

lamb chop
I came across vandalism in the "lamb chop" (Shari Lewis) page, namely the addition of a "mecha chop" section and photo. I don't have a wiki account (yet), so can you fix it, as it looks like you've done before? Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.73.143.26 (talk) 22:21, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for October 03, 2007


Automatically delivered by COBot 02:43, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

UAA Reporting
Hi,

Thanks for taking the time to find inappropriate usernames to report to WP:UAA. However, I'd like to remind you that that noticeboard is for names that are blatant violations of policy and need to be immediately blocked, not names that violate slightly or simply meet one of the examples given in the policy. In such cases, if you are genuinely concerned about the name, you should consider talking to the user about it. Using the template uw-username is one way to do this. If discussion doesn't alleviate your concerns or lead to a suitable response, you can then bring the name to WP:RFCN.

I particularly wanted to mention the name "Siddiquimohammedsaad". This is, by fairly quick inspection, simply an arabic name without spaces or CamelCase. This makes it somewhat hard to read, but it certainly doesn't qualify as "confusing", which is the aspect of policy you appeared to be reporting it under.

I hope this has helped clarify the process for you. SamBC(talk) 20:18, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

HarveyCarter sockpuppet
Hi. In the past I reported new instances of the HarveyCarter sockpuppet to you for blocking. I thought I received a note saying I should just add the new ID to the list on the HarveyCarter sockpuppet page, but that doesn't seem to be resulting in anything with the newest ID. Maybe I'm remembering the instructions wrong, and I can't find them now. At any rate, he's back, spewing the same John Wayne-hating (identical) quotes, now under the name JJuliech. I'm sorry to put this here but I seem unable to recall precisely what I should do most quickly to have this problem poster blocked. (I think he's up to 28 IDs now.) Thanks. Monkeyzpop 14:25, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Diff to remember
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism&diff=164189773&oldid=164189524 83.64.118.178 03:12, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for October 15th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 09:57, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for October 22nd, 2007.
Sorry for the tardiness in sending the Signpost this week. --Ral315

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 14:35, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for October 29th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:59, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

RFAR
Try at either meta or WP:BN - meta is ussually faster if it is really an emergency. Viridae Talk 12:48, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Requests for arbitration/Eyrian
Hello,

An Arbitration case involving you has been opened: Requests for arbitration/Eyrian. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Requests for arbitration/Eyrian/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Requests for arbitration/Eyrian/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Anthøny  20:20, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for November 5th and 12th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:06, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for November 19th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 10:30, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

RE: Jimbo Wale legal email removal
Sry bout tat, its juct cause the email its the NRC email and we get spammed alot...btw thx 4 warning me - GC

Can u put on my Userpage: NRC ADMIN the RETIRED image....thx - GC —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.13.200.61 (talk) 20:13, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for November 26th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:26, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Requests for arbitration/Eyrian
This Arbitration case has now closed, and the final decision is available at the above link. Whereas Eyrian has engaged in abusive sock puppetry in an apparent attempt to game the system, and failed to offer any reasonable explanation for his actions, his Administrator privileges are revoked (and may only be restored through appeal to the Arbitration Committee), and is banned from Wikipedia until he provides satisfactory explanation regarding this matter.

For the Arbitration Committee, Anthøny  17:24, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for December 3rd, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 09:46, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Deletion campaign by 76.176.167.130
An editor identifiable only by 76.176.167.130 has been on a campaign to remove material he apparently finds personally offensive or discomfiting from a number of articles. He has deleted entire sections (and removed any citations which might support those sections) dealing with quite legitimate topics regarding the sexual orientation or sobriety of various celebrities, in particular Randolph Scott, Katharine Hepburn, Spencer Tracy, and Cary Grant. Although I myself am rampantly opposed to gossip and to the increasingly frequent "outing" of anyone and everyone that seems to be de rigeur in some circles, I believe that the material relating to sexual orientation may well have a legitimate place in these articles, especially as cited and most currently expressed. Therefore, the wholesale deletion of anything which in some fan's eyes "denigrates" the subject is in direct contravention of Wikipedia's stated purposes. I have reverted a couple of times, but see an edit war brewing. Is there a means of preventing this activity when the editor, 76.176.167.130, is not a registered editor? Monkeyzpop (talk) 21:18, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for December 10th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:48, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

New HarveyCarter sockpuppet, with a twist
Another sockpuppet of HarveyCarter has arisen, without a Username, editing many of the same items with exact or near-exact phrasing. He uses 172.142.186.188. I've reverted a number of his edits, but am not sure how to address the absence of a Username in getting him blocked. Monkeyzpop (talk) 21:22, 13 December 2007 (UTC)


 * And today he returns, as 172.209.8.246 Monkeyzpop (talk) 20:51, 14 December 2007 (UTC)


 * He has returned with a username today, 4 January 2007: HaroldHakindson is his new one, as of today. Monkeyzpop (talk) 04:01, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
 * And a glance at his contributions page suggests that he's now using popups to revert anything and everything submitted by one of his presumed "enemies". This could get nasty. Monkeyzpop (talk) 04:05, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for December 17th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 19:21, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for December 26th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 13:40, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Sockpuppets of User: 767-249ER-
Dear User,

I am 767-249ER and I am telling you that your mission to bar me out of this website has only begun. I have created many accounts on here already and you will never find them as I use many differant computers to do my work.

As a word of advice, I would check the report of "Sockpuppets of Okayama". It will be an interesting read for people like you who don't have a life outside Wikipedia.

--220.239.180.212 (talk) 11:47, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for January 14th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:45, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for January 21st, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 00:16, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Re: Removing user from WP:AIAV
WP:NLT says that such incidents should be reported to WP:AN/I, not WP:AIV. AIV is for simple, obvious vandalism; legal threats require more complex attention and possibly discussion, and so belong at AN/I. Cheers, Waggers (talk) 22:19, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I think an imminent block is very likely, but it's important to make sure - please see Don't overlook legal threats. Waggers (talk) 22:27, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for January 28th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 04:03, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

village pump thread
See WP:VPM. I think this may be a valid complaint, given the poor quality of, in particular, the timeline evidence that was provided at the SSP page. —Random832 16:00, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

I am not Mickylynch, and the way in which you handled this case beggars belief. If only there was a way to revert admins powers then it would weed out the bad admins in this place. Markanthony102 (talk) 14:21, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

February 2008
Could you please explain why you considered my edit to Del Amitri to be vandalism? Wittlessgenstein (talk) 10:13, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Could you please explain why you considered my edit to Del Amitri to be "unconstructive"? Wittlessgenstein (talk) 00:07, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the apology on my Talk page. Please revert your deletion of my edit. Wittlessgenstein (talk) 08:23, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for reverting. Wittlessgenstein (talk) 09:43, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for February 4th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:25, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

WP:OP TOR exit nodes
How exactly did you find those TOR exit nodes? Just wondering... Calvin 1998  Talk   Contribs  02:41, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
 * By the way, do you know a way of finding if an IP is an open proxy? Calvin 1998   Talk   Contribs  05:13, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: Email
The email sent via BJAODN was definitely me. This is posted for confirmation. Thanks, --Solumeiras (talk) 11:04, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

WP:OP
You're not allowed to say or  at WP:OP until you're a verified user (Cobi said + it says on the intro to the WP:OP page). Calvin 1998  Talk   Contribs  17:05, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Lets settle this thing
We've both been waiting a long time. In fairness, I have been extremely low key about the whole affair when I have had a right to be much angrier. I would appreciate (But don't expect) an apology from you and the other offending administrator. Markanthony102 (talk) 14:31, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Question about Markanthony101
Can you explain why neither the SSP report nor any of the unblock declines made any mention of any common factor between the articles the accounts were attempting to get deleted? —Random832 20:42, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Who owes who

 * See RFCU, I think someone (the puppetmaster, not you) owes me an apology. — Rlevse  •  Talk  • 11:02, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

*ping*
You've got mail. Nwwaew (Talk Page) (Contribs) (E-mail me) 02:07, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
 * As do you. :) Sarah 02:27, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for February 11th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:00, 14 February 2008 (UTC)