User talk:NyMetsForever

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cathedral of the Nativity of the Mother of God (Toronto) has been accepted
 Cathedral of the Nativity of the Mother of God (Toronto), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Cathedral_of_the_Nativity_of_the_Mother_of_God_(Toronto) help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Reading Beans Talk to the Beans? 13:10, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

May 2022
Hello, I'm Doug Weller. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Talk:Book of Daniel that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 06:35, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, NyMetsForever

Thank you for creating Karpov-Kasparov Rivalry.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

&maltese; SunDawn &maltese;    (contact)   08:13, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

Shawn Rodrigue-Lemieux moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Shawn Rodrigue-Lemieux, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. NenChemist (talk) 09:28, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

Shawn Rodrigue-Lemieux redirected
Hello,

I am a member of the new page patrol team here on Wikipedia. I wanted to let you know that I have redirected your article about Shawn Rodrigue-Lemieux to our World Youth Chess Championship article. The quality of your sources on the article are quite solid, and Shawn is very close to meeting the notability criteria for chess. However, it's a tad too soon for a mainspace article. Regardless of notability criteria for specific types of topics all articles need to meet our general notability criteria. Unfortunately, one of our exclusionary criterion is when a majority of coverage about a topic relates to a single event. It's important for our policies that topics are able to remain notable over the long-term.

As I mentioned in my edit summary, should Shawn get more generalized coverage or should he achieve grandmaster, it may be appropriate for him to have his own article.

As an editor, you are more than free to revert my redirect as part of the bold, revert, discuss cycle. In such a case other editors may decide to take other avenues for handling an article inappropriate for mainspace, such as articles for deletion, where the community formally discusses whether an article should remain or not. It's also possible should you revert the redirect that other editors disagree with my assessment and actually concur that it is ready for the mainspace. Wikipedia prides itself on determining things via consensus.

Please do not let this discourage you! Wikipedia can always use more editors - especially editors that contribute with content, as you did with Karpov-Kasparov Rivalry!

Feel free to ping me or head over to my talk page if you have any questions.

Cheers! — Sirdog (talk) 13:04, 20 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi. First of all, thanks for taking interest in my article. Secondly, I must respectfully disagree with your decision. Ordinarily, I would see your point, but Wikipedia's coverage of Canadian Chess players is woefully lacking, and many stubs of other chess players are allowed to stand. Shawn is the number 1 junior in Canada, and recently one of the most covered Canadian chess players in chess world. I think having at least a short article seems to be appropriate, given how little Wikipedia covers Canadian chess players. Also, while many articles reference his world championship, many are about his other achievements, like, for example, how he is quickly becoming GM, or how he is #1 junior in Canada. I think some other users agree as well. Let me know if what I say makes sense. NyMetsForever (talk) 21:48, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
 * What you say certainly makes sense! I appreciate your reply. It appears other editors do agree with you as my redirect was reverted and another patroller marked your page as reviewed, which is (while hyperbolic) a seal of approval for inclusion and allows the page to immediately be indexed by search engines. I have no issue with this, especially since the patroller who reviewed it is significantly more experienced than me. My inexperience will be necessity involve me making errors until I acclimate more, and it was ultimately an edge case for me as to whether to mark as reviewed or not. Congratulations on your successful article, and happy editing! — Sirdog (talk) 23:56, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

Anand photo
Hi, thanks for your interesting question on de:wp. My answer contains a little guesswork, but it's the best I can come up with. Cheers, Stefan64 (talk) 19:38, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Carlsen–Nakamura rivalry for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Carlsen–Nakamura rivalry is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Carlsen–Nakamura rivalry until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Usedtobecool ☎️ 13:27, 27 March 2024 (UTC)