User talk:Nyanez1

Peer Review from Wen Xu
-

_______________
 * 1) Quality of Information: 1 (Some parts not finished)
 * 2) Article size: 1 (Less than expected)
 * 3) Readability: 2
 * 4) Refs: 1 (Not enough citations)
 * 5) Links: 2
 * 6) Responsive to comments: 2
 * 7) Formatting: 2
 * 8) Writing: 2
 * 9) Used real name or has real name on User TALK page: 2
 * 10) Outstanding: 1 (Not finished but the Sihler's Method part is well organized)

Total:   16    out of 20