User talk:Nyjockboy2

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question and then place  before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! &Lambda;ua&int; Wi  se  (talk) 14:19, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Sockpuppetry and blanking page discussion
You appear to making exactly the same edits to Sarah Lawrence related articles that User:Jvolkblum was making. Please don't do this. I'm going to assume that are your unfamiliar with our WP:SOCK policy, but I suggest you observe it. Also, please don't blank discussion on article talk pages as you did here.--The Fat Man Who Never Came Back (talk) 00:53, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

User:Nyjockboy2 Reply; I have read many of the comments on the discussion page and agree with much of what j volk blum has written. I dont agree with the comments, edits + re-edits of several other members, and think that they should be corrected. The emphasis on the Bronxville/Yonkers location in the first paragraph is a misplaced argument. The school is in Yonkers, and its mailing address is in Bronxville. The remaining info (ie. "it is common for to refer to the 'bronxville campus' . . . ") is merely an opinion that is being mis-referenced as fact. Therefore I too have edited this section so as to account for the validity of member arguments and to improve the Wikipedia encyclopedia.

I apologize for 'blanking' a discussion, as noted above. It was an error if done!!

Edit summaries
As I noted on User talk:Jvolkblum, the purpose of your edits is more likely to be understood by other editors if you use edit summaries.--The Fat Man Who Never Came Back (talk) 00:57, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Wykagyl Counrty Club
Another editor has added the " " template to the article Wykagyl Counrty Club, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the  template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 00:00, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Wykagyl golf club
Another editor has added the " " template to the article Wykagyl golf club, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the  template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 00:00, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

New message
It is clear that several people are concerned with the actions of HMishkoff. First his actions were hampering resolution over a simple factual problem, and now his actions are detracting from the overall effectiveness of the SLC page and Wikipedia site. I said it was clear to me how others had become annoyed at such a dynamic. Now I am directly annoyed!

Maybe someone can figure the proper way to document him for these issues?--No1Manhattanite (talk) 07:21, 8 February 2008 (UTC)


 * I want to point out that you sent me the following message:


 * I do not wish to continue any back-and-forth arguments over such insignificant issues. It is a waste of time and energy.


 * If the "new message" above is your way of discontinuing the argument, I don't think it's going to work. HMishkoff (talk) 13:13, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:Sheraton New York 1.JPG
A tag has been placed on Image:Sheraton New York 1.JPG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. BlueAzure (talk) 06:18, 27 March 2008 (UTC) BlueAzure (talk) 06:18, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:Sheraton New York Hotel.JPG
A tag has been placed on Image:Sheraton New York Hotel.JPG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. BlueAzure (talk) 06:24, 27 March 2008 (UTC) BlueAzure (talk) 06:24, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Image:15 Park Row 5.JPG
An image that you uploaded, Image:15 Park Row 5.JPG, has been listed at because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. BlueAzure (talk) 20:49, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Image:15 Park Row 4.JPG
An image that you uploaded, Image:15 Park Row 4.JPG, has been listed at because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. BlueAzure (talk) 20:56, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Image:WykagylCountryClub.JPG
An image that you uploaded, Image:WykagylCountryClub.JPG, has been listed at because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. BlueAzure (talk) 21:25, 29 March 2008 (UTC)