User talk:Nyllewell

Speedy deletion of The pole star longs for the south wind
A tag has been placed on The pole star longs for the south wind requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. srushe (talk) 11:18, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The creation log for this page indicates that it was created with the "db-context" tag already in place, which indicates that you may be reposting an article that has already been deleted once. However, I notice that you have placed the "hangon" tag on the page (which you did incorrectly, and I have corrected for you), so you should add an explanation to the page's talk page.  For the record, I believe you HAVE provided sufficient context, and, while the article needs a good bit of cleaning up, I believe it should be retained. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:23, 22 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Further investigation shows that, based on your user name (NyLllewel) you may well be the artist described in the article (Martin Llewellyn), and, since there are no other sources cited, and a Google search reveals no references to your work, the notability of your work must be questioned. This alone will be sufficient reason for the article to be deleted. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:28, 22 September 2008 (UTC)