User talk:Nypoetsociety

Welcome!
Hello, Nypoetsociety, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Shaun Shane, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Tea House, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Binksternet (talk) 04:39, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of Shaun Shane


The article Shaun Shane has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Primary sources and blogs cannot be used to establish notability. I looked for WP:Reliable sources and found nothing.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Binksternet (talk) 04:39, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Shaun Shane for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shaun Shane is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Shaun Shane until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Binksternet (talk) 14:54, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

December 2013
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shaun Shane. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. • Gene93k (talk) 19:12, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with this edit to Shaun Shane. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you.  Josh3580 talk/hist 19:22, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

Please stop removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages as you did with this edit to Shaun Shane. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Bluefist  talk 19:23, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages as you did with this edit to Shaun Shane. Bluefist  talk 19:28, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Admr Boltz  19:38, 28 December 2013 (UTC)


 * That is one part where I have to disagree with you. We have a very strict biographical policy, which not only requires strong sources for anything controversial, but also grants admins working on them very wide latitude in addressing issues with them. Shaun's article here has nothing in the way of strong sources (they're all either tied to him or blogs, which is unacceptable for a biography). On a secondary note, I would strongly suggest you use and change your username so that it doesn't imply that the account is shared. See WP:Username policy for more details. — Jeremy   v^_^v  Bori! 20:16, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Shaun Shane. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Twitter is not a Reliable Source.  Admr Boltz  20:54, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

Blocked
This account has been blocked indefinitely for sockpuppetry per the findings of Sockpuppet investigations/Nypoetsociety. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:16, 1 January 2014 (UTC)