User talk:Nyraxis

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi Nyraxis! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

-- 09:35, Sunday, May 28, 2023 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi Nyraxis! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

-- 14:53, Wednesday, September 27, 2023 (UTC)

Census updates
Thanks for adding 2021 census data, but please don't remove earlier census data from the article. instead shift earlier census data to the demographics section or history section. As a general principle, don't delete appropriately cited content (unless there is clear policy violation). Thanks 06:51, 6 November 2023 (UTC) Kerry (talk) 06:51, 6 November 2023 (UTC)


 * I kinda agree, but specific demographic data like "most common languages spoken at home" (or something like that) is just really relevant for some suburb when its not outdated. And just keeping on adding new demographic data for all the new censuses would kinda make the article unnecessarily long, bechause its 90% irrelevant outdated data. I/We/One/You could add a table for the more relevant stuff like population by using (Template:Historical populations). Could you say what specific article you were talking about? sience i edited multiple articles.
 * Thanks for your patience Nyraxis (talk) 14:07, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Having contributed to Wikipedia since 2005, I have seen many discussions about what is the right amount of census information. And opinions of contributors about how much is "interesting", "relevant", "important" varies widely. The same conversation come up about climate date, election results, sports results, history, geography, etc. Simply what interests one contributor may not interest another. We assume that the interest by the readers in all of these things varies widely as well. There is no real limit on how long a Wikipedia article can be (although we do split ones into sub-topics if they get huge) and readers are free to read or not read whichever parts of article do or don't interest them. So the general rule on Wikipedia is that if content is related to the topic of an article and is cited to a reliable source and doesn't violate any policies, then generally there is no rationale to delete it. The other aspect to this is that every word in Wikipedia is written by another human being and if someone went to the trouble of writing about common languages spoken at home in some article, when they come back and see that information has been removed, then that is highly demotivating in terms of making further contributions, so it's important to be respectful of good faith contributions. Also this is a collaborative environment; if you go around deleting other people's content for a non-policy-based reason, you won't make a lot of friends. You will have a happier and more productive time as a Wikipedian if you work with others not against them. If you have any questions about this or anything else, please ask. The best way to get my attention (or any Wikipedian's attention) is to write on their User Talk page which is the "(talk)" that appears at the end of signatures like this Kerry (talk) 20:02, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Stefan Behrens for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stefan Behrens is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Stefan Behrens until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Tails  Wx  14:52, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Julie Condra


A tag has been placed on Julie Condra requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Articles for deletion/Julie Condra. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 23:36, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Julie Condra


A tag has been placed on Julie Condra requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Articles for deletion/Julie Condra. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CycloneYoris talk! 04:11, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

Contested deletion
This page should not be speedily deleted because the sources show she received an award as a child actress.... (your reason here) --Ipigott (talk) 07:37, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

This page should not be speedily deleted because... when i created it, i didn’t know there was a previous deleted article with apparently a similar content. This is maybe due to an edit to the page, which was done by someone else after i created the page. My version was/is not a repost of deleted content, and Julie Condra was also in a Women in Red list. (your reason here) --Nyraxis (talk) 13:26, 2 December 2023 (UTC)


 * and, I've gone through all the sources I can find, and this actress seems a very minor actor, and likely to be deleted. It's not the fault of either of you.  Julie Condra's body of work has no real substance.  Her most notable role, Santa Barbara (TV series) as Emily DiNapoli Hughes, is so light-weight, that I can't find anything of substance to use here. There are a lot of actors who spend their entire careers appearing in bit-part roles, and none of them are likely to have a Wikipedia article.  Sorry to tell you this, but that's why this is likely to be deleted. — Maile  (talk) 03:22, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red
Hi there, Nyraxis, and welcome to Women in Red. I see you have already created a few short biographies of women and hope there will be many more. You might find it useful to look through our Ten Simple Rules to help you along. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 07:47, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

Hwang Ye-ji moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Hwang Ye-ji (1). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and see Draft:Yeji (singer) and Articles for deletion/Yeji (singer). I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Lightoil (talk) 00:24, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

Advice
Hello, Nyraxis,

If you look at the page log for a deleted article, you can see if an article was previously deleted and, if so, why it was deleted.

If you have questions about article creation or Wikipedia's deletion processes, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 05:52, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hwang Ye-ji (1) (December 21)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lightoil was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hwang Ye-ji (1) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Hwang_Ye-ji_(1) Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Lightoil&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Hwang_Ye-ji_(1) reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Lightoil (talk) 02:28, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red January 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:17, 28 December 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Disambiguation link notification for January 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Ļaudona, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page German. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 05:50, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

Women in Red February 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:09, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red March 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:23, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red April 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 19:43, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red May 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 06:17, 28 April 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

thanks
thanks for your help in improving my article on Nicholas Audley, 1st Baron Audley vs putting in draft

this is the kind of help that i am needing on my articles thanks Briannemartindale (talk) 20:09, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

Women in Red June 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 07:05, 23 May 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Merge SEO
Hi @Nyraxis, I see that you place the Merge from on Search engine optimization. You have not started the discussion on that talk page and you have not place Merge to on SEO Specialist. Please review Step 1 and 2 of WP:MERGE, which is an information page that explains how to perform merge requests. I would ask you to start the discussion at Talk:Search engine optimization, so that editors can weigh-in. --Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 01:34, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

Women in Red August 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 14:28, 30 June 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Draft:Saathain
Hey, Nyraxis. I see you're in the middle of translating the German Wikipedia page Saathain into the English Wikipedia. Thank you for doing that, and for making a really good effort to attribute the translation! I know it can be a bit confusing, but all the steps you need to do are:

1) In the initial edit where you move material across, you add something like "Content in this edit was copied/translated from the Wikipedia page language code:foreign Wikipedia article name ; see its history for attribution." The link part is the most important; if you forget (or are like me and have fat, typo-prone thumbs) you can just make a dummy edit using a format like this:WP:RIA-TRANSLATE

2)Optional step: add the "translated template page" to the talk page of the article. Again, completely optional, but I see you already know how to do it and I personally think it's a great idea.

On a side note- how have I not thought of just copying the Spanish article into a Wikipedia draft when I'm doing my translations? I've been bouncing around between windows, but your way of doing things seems much more efficient. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 23:31, 7 July 2024 (UTC)