User talk:Nyth83/Archives/2015/July

Misty Edwards
I posted Misty Edwards on WikiAlpha.The Cross Bearer (talk) 04:15, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia library Newspapers.com renewal
Your free one-year account with Newspapers.com will end on August 7 2015. Newspapers.com has offered to extend existing accounts by another year. If you wish to keep your account until August 7 2016, please add your name to the Account Renewal list here. I'll let Newspapers.com customer support know, and they will extend your subscription. If you don't want to keep your account for another year, you don't have to do anything. Your account will expire unless I hear from you that you want to keep it. All the best, HazelAB (talk) 15:05, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

WP:BLPPRIVACY
Hi Nyth83. Would you please not restore improperly sourced content to Echosmith? As I tried to explain, you need both solid sources and you need to persuade other editors that an exception to WP:BLPPRIVACY should be permitted. Also, when editors object to you edits, you should seek consensus for your edits and not simply restore them repeatedly (see WP:BURDEN). Please also read WP:EW if you are not already familiar with it.- MrX 15:49, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

July 2015
Your recent editing history at Echosmith shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.''You are way over the limit on reverts. I strongly recommend that you self-revert.'' - MrX 01:15, 27 July 2015 (UTC)


 * No, I am claiming exemption under the valdalism rule.

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. - MrX 02:03, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

July 2015
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. ceradon ( talk •  contribs ) 03:46, 27 July 2015 (UTC)