User talk:Nyttend/Archive 22

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Kit right arm redline.png


A tag has been placed on File:Kit right arm redline.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:58, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

simonpaullipaliverpool.jpg
Thanks for the info. I've already got license agreements emailed to wikipedia but they are not being seen. what does one have to do to get wikipedia to actually acknowledge the license agreements? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Calence (talk • contribs) 00:14, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

permissions pending - yes please restore the image for me!
Hi,

Thank you for being the only helpful wikipedia editor Ive ever encountered in my life! Youve been a great help. Yes please if you can restore the image so I can put the code in for the pending permissions that would be fabulous! I did send it to the correct address but on 2 of my photos i never heard back, im not sure why. It seems some of the emails get lost... I am having the photographers themselves email directly now - all the signed release forms I send get ignored except for the alien - deadly returns photo. That one was accepted, the others ignored.

Thanks for your help!!!
 * The above comment was made by an IP address; per this note, the comment was left by Calence while logged out. In order to follow the privacy policy, these edits have been oversighted; since the IP address was the only problematic part, and since the comment itself was without any problems at all, the text is left here.  Nyttend (talk) 04:40, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

Request for help with AfD problem
It's been a while since I've bugged you with a newbie problem, so I hope that you'll let me abuse your kindness again&mdash;

I've just started going through the AfD process with ESS Drum & Bugle Corps, which I strongly suspect of being a high-school prank or the like. Everything went swimmingly until I reached the step where I edited Articles for deletion/Log/2012 January 4. The subclusion process seems to have done everything it should, and my suggestion appears to be in the same format as everyone else's in the edit window; but the article's title, history-link, etc., don't show up.

I experimented by moving my proposal below the top one in the list, but that didn't help at all. The only thing I can think of is that the ampersand in the title interacts strangely with the template. However, I see that an ampersand isn't on the list of forbidden characters in article titles.

Any thoughts? Guidance would be appreciated; if nothing else, could you suggest an appropriate venue at which to ask this question? Thanks (and thanks again for all the questions you've answered in the past). --Ammodramus (talk) 16:49, 4 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Many thanks. I think you've hit on what I did wrong.  Instead of clicking on the "Preloaded debate", I clicked the redlink for "this article's entry".  Will try to remember that next time; maybe I should try to find some deletion-worthy articles for practice...  Ammodramus (talk) 17:28, 4 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Strayboots looks like it might have verifiable notability from the Times story (which badly wants formatting). EDEX Careers looks like it got its may-not-meet-notability-guidelines template this month; would it be appropriate to propose it for deletion before giving the editor a chance to respond?  I'm thinking about StealTheDeal, which looks promotional and which only cites a couple of press releases from the company itself.  A Google search doesn't turn up any evidence that they've been covered by reputable media.  Beside, they use "everyday" as an adverb; thus their deletion will make the world a slightly better place.  Ammodramus (talk) 00:51, 5 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Tried it with StealTheDeal. It worked much better when I actually followed the directions...  To boot, when I notified the editor who'd created the article that it'd was up at AfD, I found that it'd been deleted before and that the editor had apparently re-created it.  Ammodramus (talk) 01:18, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Pages with photo of the Bono Site.pdf listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pages with photo of the Bono Site.pdf, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Leyo 23:02, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Bio box colors - can you help me with a quick change?
Hi there,

I'm wondering if you can help me with something - on the page I created (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simon_Britton) I would like to make the headings under the musician bio appear the standard Wiki yellow and not blue. How do I do this and still maintain the form the pre-made musician box has?

Thanks for any help you can give. I didn't want to keep editing it and trying to figure it with excessive edits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Calence (talk • contribs) 18:40, 6 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks! I just found a wiki article. I guess the TYPE of musician indicated changes the colors automatically. Solo singer is yellow, band is blue, etc. Thanks!!! You've been most helpful. When I say that I wasn't able to get the help I need before, I meant for licensing issues - the other people have just deleted, scolded, reprimanded... not once helping me with a "how can I" attitude... which is what you have been so helpful with and clear with. Thanks for your help, very much appreciated. Happy new year! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Calence (talk • contribs) 20:35, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Ohio House in Philly
I thought you might be interested in this. It's one of two buildings left in Fairmount Park (the original site) from the 1876 Philadelphia Centennial Exhibition. A contributing site to the huge NRHP Fairmount Park site. Apparently 23 companies from Ohio gave the stone for this - see e.g. "Dayton Stone" near the top of the gable. I must have another dozen on pix, but by themselves the names aren't all that interesting as pix. Any idea of what to do with this? Smallbones (talk) 01:26, 7 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Well, it's only if you are interested. It was the Ohio State Pavillion at the 1876 "World's Fair".  There are stone company's names engraved, e.g. from Cincinnati.  I could probably get a paragraph or two from Philly sources on this.  If it had any interest to Midwesterners ....   Let me know if you think of anything.  Smallbones (talk) 05:08, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

TheKosCzPistyTeam page
'''Thank you very much you've canceled my page. You're very helpful indeed. If you knew how hard it is to create and write this page that does not promote anything that only gives information about my organization. Everywhere I went in and I closed the site because it did not match "rules". I thought that at least on the English Wikipedia will be reasonable and understanding but as I see so probably not. I will write page again please dont delete it. Please i didnt do it it again and again.''' — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheKosCzPistyTeam (talk • contribs) 14:14, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Left a note about appropriate use of user space.  Acroterion  (talk)   14:26, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Ohio University
Hi Nyttend. I saw your edit in talk:kingdom of Sardinia, where you said that Ohio University is a reliable source. Unfortunately, the version of the page you blocked, is the version which is against Ohio University, against Britannica, against all Italian reliable sources, and supported solely by a single Sardinian-nationalist and revisionist source. Speeches in talk page are useless, because the page is affected by a small group of Sardinian nationalists who managed many times to block the page in their alternate-history version. Unfortunately, about this topic en.wikipedia will speak against all reliable sources until April 8.--Jonny Bee Goo (talk) 00:07, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
--MuZemike 04:24, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

--me, too. 04:39, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Georgian Shepherd Dog
Just an FYI - I reverted your move to Georgian shepherd by analogy with German Shepherd Dog, Belgian Shepherd Dog and Anatolian Shepherd Dog. – ukexpat (talk) 15:55, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

FYI
[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&diff=470742345 "Nyttend reverted my entry on the Wikipedia Administrators noticeboard"] with regard to [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators'_noticeboard%2FIncidents&diff=470740428 this edit]. Goodvac (talk) 05:21, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Gundagai
Hi Nyttend, I see you have reverted to the version of the Gundagai article that I cleaned up a few days ago, where I removed a lot or irrelevant material put in by the banned anonymous Gundagai editor and made some changes to the section order for clarity. I have added back a small edit for a link to a new page for the Prince Alfred Bridge and might do a bit of other cleaning up over the next few days. Garyvines (talk) 12:31, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Rangeblocks
Hi, see this. Cheers. WilliamH (talk) 07:06, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

Our Lady of Lourdes Catholic Church (Raleigh, North Carolina)
I see you CSDed the article, but would you be so kind as to also close the AfD discussion?  Purpleback pack  89 ≈≈≈≈  14:25, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

Album images
Hi, I just noticed the file deletion related to and this. I was trying to help, in response to tag. The image enforcement practices here are pretty baffling even for experienced general editors; I would have appreciated a talk page notification.

I've just found guidance on album cover image size at Template:Infobox Album. Is there a policy page that explains the general requirements, please? I would like to add a link to it into the Bad GIF template. – Fayenatic (talk) 18:55, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
 * My general rule is that nonfree images that belong on just one article, such as album covers, should not be any larger than the size at which it's displayed in the article. In this situation, the larger image was problematic simply because it was larger — filetype wasn't an issue at all.  I've never seen anything that would be more relevant than the criteria; if all you need is beyond that page, you're in the same boat as I.  Nyttend (talk) 19:24, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
 * OK, thanks. I've added more at Preparing images for_upload and linked to it in that template. – Fayenatic (talk) 13:39, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Three Witnesses, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lehi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Three Witnesses
Please excuse the disturbance. I was just thinking about your comment in the discussion here about the added citations lacking "multiple crucial components needed to identify their sources", and I was wondering if perhaps you read the diff backwards. It seems that some of the citations that were removed from the article were a little vague (such as Bushman, 323, 347-48; and Palmer, 180-81, 193-94, 197-99. ) while the citations that were added had lots of the information needed to identify the sources. I pointed that out in a recent comment, but I was curious if that was what you saw. ~Adjwilley (talk) 21:25, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Pinboard (website)
Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

January 2012 Newsletter for WikiProject United States and supported projects
--Kumi-Taskbot (talk) 18:25, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Talkback re email

 * Thanks for your reply, I've noted it at Administrators' Noticeboard where I'll comment on it. Fifelfoo (talk) 05:11, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

Talkback re: logo related help
Thank you very much. Really appreciate your help on the Bangalore Restaurant Week logo. Thanks again. Varunr (talk) 07:23, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

Semi-colons
Clauses are clauses. They are not stand-alone sentences. If a sentence repeats the subject and verb after the semi-colon, then you can be absolutely certain that there is a more concise and expressive way of conveying the information. In the cases that I corrected the two sentences that had been strung together with the semi-colon had additional phrases or clauses attached. This makes the total horse-and-cart sentence extremely clumsy, indictaing that it should be split in two.

So there are two options:
 * If your subject remains the same, and your verb is the same, or is at least a similar, find an appropriate verbal link.
 * Matthew Boulton was a patron of James Watt and commissioned a steam engine from him in the 1770s; he installed it in the Soho factory where it remained for a hundred years.
 * c.f.
 * Matthew Boulton was a patron of James Watt and, in 1770, commissioned a Steam engine to be installed in the Soho factory, where it remained for a hundred years.


 * Use the present participle:
 * At 404 feet high, the spire is the tallest in England, the tallest 14th century structure in the world and the tallest masonry spire ever built; it surpasses the second tallest spire in the country by more than 80 feet.
 * How clumsy!
 * At 404 feet high, the spire is the tallest in England, surpassing the second tallest by more than 80 feet. It is both the tallest masonry spire ever built and the world's tallest 14th century structure.

There are correct ways to use semi-colons. They are not simply stand-ins for a full-stop and a capital letter.
 * The material in the sentence is different but perfectly balanced. There may be another way of saying it, but the balance makes a point.
 * He likes tea; I like coffee.


 * The material of the second half impacts strongly upon the information contained in the first.
 * The general planned the attack for dawn; the rebel troops attacked at midnight.


 * The material is balanced but conflicting.
 * Tradition has it that the white calf is a fairy apparition; science suggests that it is the product of marsh gas.

If either sentence is long then you can be absolutely certain that the use of a semi-colon is not appropriate.

Amandajm (talk) 07:52, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

RESCUETAGGED‎, RESCUETAG and RESCUETEMPLATE
I notice you declined the G8 on the above as the ARS exists, however they relate more to Template:Rescue and point to the sections of the ARS project page that have been removed now so they meet the "redirects to invalid targets" criteria, would you re-consider or do you wish me to take them to WP:RfD ? Mt king (edits) 21:06, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your reply, I accept the procedural point can be viewed both ways, however as all of them are relativity "new" (created since 31 October last year) and don't have significant "What links here lists" I don't see the value in keeping them now the rescue template has been deleted. Mt  king (edits) 21:22, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Alcoa & Obama
I think it's relevant because he's the pres. Just my 2 cents. I'm not going to revert you're edit, unless asked. --Dana60Cummins (talk) 21:33, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Kohara
Per your request, which I appreciate, I have expanded the article a bit and added four sources. You may want to make an additional comment at the AfD debate. Thanks again.  Cullen 328 Let's discuss it  04:25, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Semi-colon
OK! Have it your way! Ugly writing is bad writing. Amandajm (talk) 05:10, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Deletion
Is it normal to delete articles that are in the process of being created ? i'm new, and you deleted my in progress article on the 522 (that was previously deleted when written by a different user) I'm hoping it is up to snuff so to say with wiki. Thanks --RichardMills65 (talk) 05:09, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Ah, I see. Yes, I was just making sure that I had the section headings working properly before inputting any information. I didn't mention a template. I created the 522 article because when browsing the Sig page I noticed a link to 522 that had been deleted for copying from gunblog or some other source. --RichardMills65 (talk) 05:22, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Thank you! I was not aware of the "in use" tag. I will use that when creating from scratch in the future.

Thanks again- stop by and give me some more pointers some time --RichardMills65 (talk) 05:33, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Doctor's office, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scale (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

christmas gift hook
Are you approving this nom or just commenting? Thanks for helping. Pumpkin Sky  talk  22:34, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
 * See questions on my page. Pumpkin Sky  talk  22:58, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Wrap up questions please. Pumpkin Sky  talk  02:54, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Interesting so far but you missed the date format question, so I've been more explicit this time. Can you take a look? Thanks for all the help. Pumpkin Sky   talk  03:14, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Take a look: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_National_Register_of_Historic_Places. Pumpkin Sky   talk  00:27, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * dateform= does not work. See my attempts to fix Kluge House. Pumpkin Sky   talk  02:12, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Alaska boroughs and census areas in color.png
I came across this file. Yakutat is a borough, not a city-borough, despite its name of "City and Borough of Yakutat" and despite what has been inserted into article after article to the effect that it is a city-borough. Skagway is also a borough. The image is small enough to where I couldn't exactly tell whether or not you labeled it as a city-borough. Wrangell is a city-borough, but it was incorporated as such after you posted the file. Cheers.RadioKAOS (talk) 13:33, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

FK Fyllingsdalen
Regarding to citation needed tags you placed on FK Fyllingsdalen (thank you btw), which you added to the last sentance of the sections about Fyllingen and Løv-Ham, is it the last sentance that needs citation or the whole section? Regards, Mentoz86 (talk) 03:21, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * My question is, when you have place a tag after the sentance "The most notable former player is Erik Huseklepp.", does that mean that this sentance needs a citation or that the whole section (Fyllingen Fotball) needs additional citations? But yes, you answered my question more or less :): Mentoz86 (talk) 03:28, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * ✅ Now every sentance in the prose is backed up by a inline citation, just like in the article you showed me. But regarding "most notable former players" on Fyllingen, the source only says that Pedersen and Huseklepp are the only former Fyllingen-players to have played for the national team, not that they are the most notable ones, but I couldn't find a good way to formulate that sentance so I left it as it was. Any suggestions? Mentoz86 (talk) 17:58, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The sentance is rewritten. But those three "terms" are actually the ones I struggled most with translating. (1) Indicative vote - the members could vote on the website of the clubs, but it wasn't the result of the vote that would decide the name, that was the board's job; after looking on the result from the vote they could still choose the least wanted name, since the vote only was an indication. (2) I guess engagement could be replaced by controversy. (3) I thought borough was a part of a city, but maybe neighborhood is a better word? I don't really understand the difference between those two words. But according to the article of both Fyllingsdalen and Bergen, Fyllingsdalen is a borough of Bergen, so I'll add that to the article. Mentoz86 (talk) 11:47, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Forgot to say: Thank you! for all your help on FK Fyllingsdalen, you have not caused problems at all. Without your effort to make me improve the article, I guess the article would not have been improved this much. Mentoz86 (talk) 08:57, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

I don't think that is how you do it...
I am no expert in wp:autoblocks, but what I know suggests 1 second blocks are not the way to remove them. Is this a trick nobody bothered to write down or were you just trying something? Yoenit (talk) 22:56, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I simply don't know. It was simply trying something: since all the rights that a block removes are restored when the block expires, I figured that if I removed all abilities from him for one second, he should have all his abilities back in two seconds.  Just think of it like a G6 speedy deletion, perhaps?  It seems like a "housekeeping" block to me.  Nyttend (talk) 02:38, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The problem is autoblocks work differently: they are implemented by the software whenever a blocked user tries to edit. Autoblocks are always for 24 hours and do not automatically expire when a normal block ends. As such I see no reason why a 1 second block would help in any way. Yoenit (talk) 01:33, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I was under the impression that this user was still being affected by the autoblock caused by his own block; I figured that it would be solved by letting a new block expire. Nyttend (talk) 04:05, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Ray Lewis (police) - AfD debate
Hi Nyttend, fwiw, I've added new information concerning this debate.Plankto (talk) 22:51, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks...and now a reply.Plankto (talk) 07:49, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Cranberry Creek Archeological District
I started this article and used elkman's site. Do I need to change the 140 acres to 14 or does it show up correctly on elkman's site. I'll work more on it tomorrow. There seems to be lots of info on it. You can respond here. Pumpkin Sky  talk  04:03, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Elkman has been careful to account for the issue that I mentioned; you can count on the total being correct. If you look at its entry at nationalregisterofhistoricplaces.com, you'll see that it's listed as 1400 acres.  Nyttend (talk) 04:17, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Ah, good. Thanks. Pumpkin Sky  talk  10:57, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

answered at wt:nrhp
BTW, I think there might be scholarships covering transpo, and hostel accommodation at Wikimania. And think of all the native Aramaic speakers you'll run into there! I agree that the NRHP comes up with lots of silly names, but Vernacular Frame House has to be the silliest. Smallbones (talk) 05:21, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Payzone Deletion
The deletion of that article was still being contested, is it not usual to have a discussion first. Why was a Payzone press release a reason for deleting. I had already enquired about recreating that article and was discussing the matter with another. Can you let me know how I can re-start the process. RoyalBlueStuey (talk) 14:02, 26 January 2012 (UTC) PS the http://www.prlog.org/11745680-new-payzone-site-offers-best-priced-card-terminal-rentals-to-your-business.html article is a press release issued by PayZone...should I have referenced it RoyalBlueStuey (talk) 14:08, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I have seen your reply on my talk page, may thanks for your time. I will try and re-word the article to make it more neutral etc and I'll check it all for directly identical text so it is all unique, any suggestions/amends most welcome RoyalBlueStuey (talk) 09:35, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks
...for the feedback at the RfC on images from non-copyright states. Buffs (talk) 05:18, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Cranberry help
Hi. Sorry to bug you again, but re...Cranberry Creek Archeological District. I started this because it sounded interesting and it look like there are lots of sources on it. Well, it is mentioned a lot but the problem is, it's generally in a unreliable source and only mentioned. THere are more mounds than just the NRHP site, little directly discusses the NRHP. Can you help fine mroe info? For when we find the NRHP nomination form, is that considered RS for wiki? They have lots of info. Pumpkin Sky  talk  00:34, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
 * As soon as I created Template:Did you know nominations/Cranberry Creek Archeological District, I wondered if you'd be interested in helping create an article on Gee's Slough Mound Group and making a double nom with of course both of us getting credit? Pumpkin Sky   talk  03:04, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Lonesomehurst cabin
Neither Elkman nor NPS list this. It was listed in Aug 2011, too new I guess. But I think I can create it from other sources. I found its nom form too, on a Montana Historical Society website. Pumpkin Sky  talk  03:09, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Amrit (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Settlement


 * Overmyer-Waggoner-Roush Farm (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Wainwright

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Article about Restaurant Week
Just wanted your feedback on a new article that I have created. Does it meet Wiki standards? Would appreciate your comments and feedback (and help!). Here's the link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Bangalore_restaurant_week Varunr (talk) 11:28, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Slew of articles on books by Benedict Allen
Hallo Nyttend, I saw you'd undone my CSD's of a pile of new articles on books by Benedict Allen. You are certainly right that LadyNico is new, and it was very kind and gracious of you to give her the benefit of the doubt. However, I suspect she is connected either to Allen or to his publisher with promotional intent, and not only because of the odd circumstance of bringing many similar articles on books by him to AfC at once. The other odd fact is that Mad White Giant was created (not by her) back in 2006, in very similar style. Did Allen or the publisher suggest that LadyNico should build on that success, I wonder? No way of proving it. I have for now simply declined all the AfC requests as V, lacking sources - the obvious alternative is Adv. Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:46, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Lonesomehurst cabin
See the nom form. Its a treasure of info and has 14 photos toward the end. The topo map and 1920 photos are PD, but what about the recent ones? PD due to NPS or what? Pumpkin Sky  talk  18:01, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Mull Covered Bridge
Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

list of cathedrals
FYI, I undid the changes in the list of cathedrals in the United States article, figuring that information about the metropolitan area was of encyclopedic value in such a list; with very few exceptions the city in parentheses is the central city of the SMSA or CMSA in which the cathedral is located. (In a few cases a reference to a more general region is made.) In a very few cases, a district within a city is commonly known by and has mail addressed to a different name (notably districts in Queens in New York City and the San Fernando Valley in Los Angeles, and Eagle River in Anchorage.)  I generally tried to put those in subheadings for those cities, though it is not totally consistent yet.

If there is an improved way of doing this, we can work on it, or ask someone's advice.Zipcedric (talk) 19:14, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

Removing the names of the major cities associated with suburbs/secondary cities where cathedrals are located makes the article less informative IMHO.

The format for districts in a municipality had been like that shown in New York City, which has multiple cases of this. I have changed/restored the two other similar cases, Eagle River (Anchorage) and Sherman Oaks (Los Angeles) to the same format as those used in NYC.

There are a number of cases in which Latin rite Catholic Church has multiple dioceses in a single metro area, each named after the city the cathedral is located. Metuchen, NJ; Joliet, IL; Gary, IN, Paterson, NJ, San Bernardino CA. It seems to me reasonable and consistent to leave these unlabeled, and I removed a couple such labels, though Metuchen as an extremely small see city in the NY/NENJ metro area, may be a different case. Identifying Rockville Centre as “Long Island” seemed to make sense in that Rockville Centre diocese covers Nassau and Suffolk Counties, precisely the area popularly referred to as “Long Island”

However, most cathedrals in suburbs govern larger regional, multi-state or national dioceses of Orthodox, Eastern Catholic, Anglican, or Old Catholic churches, in which the municipality in which the cathedral lies rarely names the diocese. In these cases, the naked name of the suburban municipality in which a cathedral sits is inadequate IMHO. – e.g. the only U.S. cathedral for Orthodox Copts from Egypt in Lithonia, GA.

The cumbersome hyphenated census bureau metro area names, which often include much smaller cities than the largest and most familiar name (Cleveland-Elyria-Lorain), and sometimes combine major cities, (San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland) seems to add extraneous information and be pedantic IMHO. I have simply named the major central city and “area.” (except for Chicago/Gary in NW Indiana.)

Does this seem satisfactory? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zipcedric (talk • contribs) 19:28, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Equestria Daily logo.png
You recently deleted this file after the blocking of User:Fluttershy, a large contributor to MLP:FiM pages. I believe that it still should be used at the Equestria Daily article, so if possible, could it be put back up?  Clay  Clay  Clay  23:17, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for that, I will keep that in mind :)  Clay  Clay  Clay  08:09, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Sandusky County Jail and Sheriff's House
Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Green Leaves/Koontz House
While I agree that there was a lot of messing about with the COI sockpuppeting, the one thing that did seem correct was the move to Green Leaves. It was by far the more common name among those sources that I could find. Just because NRHP goes its own way does not over-rule WP:COMMONNAME, surely? And even NRHP refers to Green Leaves, IIRC. - Sitush (talk) 08:30, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Replied at User_talk:Sitush. Ta. - Sitush (talk) 13:04, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Gilbert-Sinton Historic District
Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:03, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

The target still exists
Hello, I had moved these following files - File:Trans-Asia ship.JPG → File:Trans-Asia ship — MV Trans-Asia 3.jpg File:Asia Malaysia.JPG → File:Trans-Asia ship — MV Asia Malaysia.jpg File:Asia Pacific.jpg → File:Trans-Asia ship — MV Asia Pacific.jpg and requested the originals to be deleted under G8. I did not understand what you meant by The target still exists? I will appreciate it. Thanks. Sumanch (talk) 04:34, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Overmyer-Waggoner-Roush Farm
Rschen7754 02:22, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Reasons to be cheerful
Thanks for your checks and vote of keep. It has stayed at keep consensus and been saved today - what a nice valentine's present. From, CathMontgomery (talk) 01:17, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Restoration of WP:WEaPOn
Not sure if it is appropriate but thank you for your time and consideration. Should I put a construction sign up? Would that perevent future problems? BTW, your insight from your life at WP would be appreciated at the project. You walked in the door, you might as well say something. Thanks again. I thought I had lost the work.```Buster Seven   Talk  07:37, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Plastomer (disambiguation)
"disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic)" is certainly true. It disambiguates only one topic and ends in (disambiguation) — the other three are red links. Either way, I still think it falls under housekeeping. Do you really think a dab page with one blue link and three reds needs to slog its way through AFD for God knows how long? Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 20:05, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, but they're all redlinked and unlikely to have articles. Don't be so pedantic. Also, at least one other editor at the AFD supports the speedy, so maybe you're wrong. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 20:19, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Does it not fit under general housekeeping? I say yes. It disambiguates NOTHING because none of the other topics have articles. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 20:20, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Don't you think that it's putting the cart before the horse to have a dab page full of redlinks like that? The fourth company on the dab turned up literally nothing on Google, so I removed it. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 20:24, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Blah blah blah. Process for the sake of process. I think it's just ludicrous that something as OBVIOUS as this has to rot in AFD for a week or longer. Oh no! Someone needs help finding their way to two different redlinks, zomg let's keep it!!!! Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 20:31, 14 February 2012 (UTC)


 * You were wrong and I was too caustic — another admin deleted it after it got piled-on in the AFD. Still, sorry for being so mean towards you about this. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 21:44, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

File:107TH ARC CAP 33XX.jpg
Hi Nyttend, since you've declined my speedy request I wanted to let you know that I've nominated this file for deletion at Files for deletion/2012 February 15. De728631 (talk) 19:11, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you too. De728631 (talk) 22:25, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Congratulations
If you like you can add this userbox to your collection.

```Buster Seven   Talk  00:36, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Good job! • Sbmeirow  •  Talk  •  15:33, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Freakyclown
I agree that it is an A7. I'm not sure that the allegation of notability in the article is sufficient without a source. Google produces nothing of value. It looks very much from https://twitter.com/#!/__freakyclown__ and especially from https://twitter.com/#!/__Freakyclown__/status/170631294961729538 and https://twitter.com/#!/__Freakyclown__/status/170634888217755648 that this could become a problem. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 01:30, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The thing is that WereSpielChequers has just declined the A7 speedy tag; tagging a page for speedy deletion for a certain reason when an admin has just declined that reason is forum shopping, and if it's not right for me to tag a page for speedy deletion for a certain reason, it's definitely not right for me to delete it for that reason without tagging it. Nyttend (talk) 01:32, 18 February 2012 (UTC)


 * I knew there'd be an ethical thing about it. I just have a feeling in my water about this one. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 01:35, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Casimer&Casimir Situation
The explanation is at User_talk:Martijn_Hoekstra (two sections above your question). Note admin action is still required. Liv it ⇑ Eh?/What? 01:50, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Horseshoe Curve
I've opened a peer review of Horseshoe Curve. I expanding the article and am hoping to get it promoted to FA. If you could take a look at the article and provide any comments on it, it would be appreciated. Thanks, ​​​​​​ ​​ Niagara ​​Don't give up the ship 20:25, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

NRHP Downtown Davenport
So what was concluded about removing "neighborhood" column? C T J F 8 3 21:41, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
 * See what was done at National Register of Historic Places listings in Sandusky, Ohio to prevent the column from appearing; you can simply copy the code from there. Nyttend (talk) 21:47, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Please assist, I'm confused. Are you saying I'm going to have to use a different table format and copy and paste everything? C T J F 8 3  21:54, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
 * No. Go to the Davenport list, add "|nocity=1" parameter to NRHP header, and add "|nocity=1" to each example of NRHP row between "|address=___" and "|county=Scott County, Iowa".  You'll need to do this for every single row, so it will be a bit of work, but it will be far less than making a completely new table.  Nyttend (talk) 22:00, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Got it, thanks, C T J F 8 3  22:12, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Lumpkin County, Georgia
Template:Lumpkin County, Georgia has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 02:53, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Krause's 19th century
I do have a copy, though it is probably ten years old. The Liberia section is only four pages, if you send me an email, I will scan them for you.--Wehwalt (talk) 13:55, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

e-mail is better
e-mail is better

Smallbones (talk) 20:39, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Your input request at RfC
As a previous contributor to the discussion, I wanted to let you know that a motion has been made to close the recent RfC and implement some of the ideas with regards to labeling and usage. Your inputs would be greatly appreciated at Wikipedia_talk:Copyrights. Buffs (talk) 01:53, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Occupy article redirects
FYI - The discussion regarding the Occupy article redirects that you commented about has been moved to Redirects for discussion. Best, Northamerica1000(talk) 02:22, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

comment moved
from ani to here Nobody Ent 02:36, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

1RR restriction and exemptionfor reverting IPs
Hi there. I just noticed you blocked Nasseriya for edit warring at Qana airstrike. As far as I knew, reverts of IPs do not count when for 1RR. The reasonfor this exemption is to allow users to revert possible socks who are not editing under their main accounts. I don't think its fair to block Nasseriya for violating 1RR. The IP was blanking sourced material and refused to follow my advice to discuss his edit on the talk page. He was being clearly disruptive and while Nasseriya should have left him a message too, he/she probably saw my message and thought he wasn't into talking. Could you please reconsider the block? Thanks T i a m u t talk 09:32, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

User:Nassiriya block
At first glance this looked like a perfectly legitimate block. But, if you look at the notice at the top of their talk page, it actually does say "edits by anonymous IP editors, may be reverted without penalty." So, right or wrong, the user was trying to act within the rules as they had been explained to them. I've asked at Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard for some clarification of this matter. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:21, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Apparently I posted that in the wrong place, it has been moved to Arbitration/Requests/Clarification. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:25, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the note; sorry for the late reply, but I was out of state today. I didn't previously notice the bit that you quote; I completely agree with your decision to unblock while protesting the relative standing of edits by IPs and registered users.  Nyttend (talk) 06:03, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Paid operatives
Hi, this essay about paid political operatives - would you be willing to check on it please? Seems to be some odd and borderline disruptive stuff happening. Thank you. Writegeist (talk) 21:39, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Many thanks for the clarification. Much appreciated. Writegeist (talk) 06:18, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Category:American people of Kazakh descent
**I never trying to move without discussion. This category is like Category:People of Uzbekistani descent, Category:People of Uzbek descent. Esc2003 (talk) 14:12, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
 * You are wrong. Kazakh is the name of a nation. But Kazakhstani is the name of a citizenship. Esc2003 (talk) 14:36, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Request
Would you have a look at User talk:Chzz and make sure I've not been too hard on the Rayfoxsoftware people? If I have, would you do the 'nice guy' bit to balance my 'nasty'? Thanks. Peridon (talk) 14:13, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Cryometer
Nyttend, the page I linked to in the speedy delete request for Cryometer does exist but it has restricted access. However, for someone with the access to the Oxford dictionary of science, it would be easy to confirm that this is a copyright violation. How can I post this request so it will be acted on? RockMagnetist (talk) 15:14, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Inter-American School Quetzaltenango, Guatemala
Nearly all of the article was copied from various pages on the school's web site. The first three paragraphs are from http://www.ias-xela.org/index.php/aboutias/school-history, the next one from http://www.ias-xela.org/index.php/aboutias/vision, and the second-to-last one from http://www.ias-xela.org/index.php/aboutias/mission. The only non-copied content is the very last sentence. ... disco spinster   talk  16:10, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Ah, well I see you've deleted it. Thanks.  ...  disco spinster   talk  16:42, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Clarification, please
You removed a speedy delete tag from an article, stating in your edit summary: (There's quite the discussion on the talk page; speedy would be inappropriate). There are three editors having a discussion on that edit page, and all three agree the article subject is non-notable and should be deleted. Could you please provide here, or on that talk page, a clarification for your unusual action? Regards, Xenophrenic (talk) 18:26, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
 * A discussion has been had about deletion, so it would be remiss to speedy delete it when the matter has already been debated. Please take it to AFD.  Nyttend (talk) 20:15, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your response. I am having trouble locating the debate to which you refer.  No one has touched the talk page in 18 months, with the exception of myself, Shii and FormerIP -- and all three of us agree that the article should be deleted; something no one has debated against. I don't see an archive of previous discussions, just what is on that page.  Also, is there a specific, citable reason why speedy deletion under criteria A7 is inappropriate? Xenophrenic (talk) 20:54, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes. Wikipedia is based on discussion, and speedy deletion when discussion has occurred is in violation of the spirit of provisions at WP:CSD.  Why are you so opposed to going to AFD?  We're not on a deadline, and a few extra days won't hurt.  Bear in mind that speedy deletion was created to ease the workload on deleting admins, not to take extra time from them to force them to explain why they won't delete specific pages.  Nyttend (talk) 20:59, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Why am I opposed to AfD? I'm not.  In fact, that's the first place I went, as that was an option raised by one of the three editors discussing the article -- all three of whom agree that the article should be deleted.  When I arrived at the AfD page and began following the instructions, I read that I must first: Carry out these checks - 1. Confirm that the article does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion... So off I went to the Speedy Deletion page, where I found that the article unquestionably met the (A7) criteria, so that is the process I followed.  I understand that WP:SD was created to save time and work, for Admins and editors of the article; but you should bear in mind that dismissing that option without proper substantiation after it has been properly applied is likely to result in additional work. That's what we now have here.


 * "speedy deletion when discussion has occurred is in violation of the spirit of provisions at WP:CSD"
 * With respect, I don't see that on the policy page. (Note that I requested a "citable" provision, to avoid just this kind of disagreement in interpretations.) This appears to be the applicable "spirit of provisions" text:
 * Speedy deletion is intended to reduce the time spent on deletion discussions for pages or media with no practical chance of surviving discussion.[1] Administrators should take care not to speedy delete pages or media except in the most obvious cases. If a page has survived its most recent deletion discussion, it generally should not be speedy deleted except for newly discovered copyright violations.
 * During article improvement and sourcing discussions, all three editors discovered that the article shouldn't exist in the first place, and had no practical chance of surviving a deletion discussion. That appears to be exactly in line with the spirit of the CSD policy.  Bottom line (if I may use frank terms to summarize): You saw a talk page discussion with the word 'delete' in it and totally understandably, but mistakenly, assumed there was a "deletion debate", instead of the actual "It should be deleted - yeah, I agree - yeah, me too" observation.  When I questioned your action, it put you on the defensive, so you have tried to justify your action, which resulted in your implication that I am mistaken (and rushing things? and wasting your time?), which has put me on the defensive.  And now we have this silly tempest in a tea cup.  I still do not see why you are opposed to the speedy deletion of that article, and I'm not inclined to entertain speculation about it at this time. Xenophrenic (talk) 23:00, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Paid political operatives: your clarification for Writegeist
Nyttend, the essayists-in-charge may not have told you that the following statements are the first and second sentences of the lead of the essay: "This is an essay about the issue of paid political operatives editing Wikipedia. It is a repository for editors to store information, arguments for and against paid operatives, conversations, and gleanings to do with the topic." (emphasis added). --  Kenatipo  speak! 20:04, 25 February 2012 (UTC)


 * I wonder if Buster7 and Writegeist know this. Should I tell them or are you going to?  --  Kenatipo    speak! 20:39, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I have responded and would appreciate your forthright examination of a troublesome situation. ```Buster Seven   Talk  01:36, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Quantum Leap
I think you misunderstood. You wrote "We're not going to move the disambiguation page here", but that's the opposite of the intent, which is to move Quantum Leap (TV series) to Quantum Leap, per WP:DAB, etc., and the consensus discussion I linked to; the DAB page is at Quantum leap (disambiguation) where it belong. The parenthetical disambiguator " " is unnecessary, and it is routine, uncontroversial maintenance to remove such disambiguators if/when they are not needed. I'll await your response before restoring the db-move, in case misunderstood. — SMcCandlish   Talk⇒〈°⌊°〉 Contribs. 00:17, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I misunderstood all right, so I've moved it per your request. I disagree with the idea, but there's no possible way to say that the discussion went the way I think it should have.  Nyttend (talk) 01:48, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Curious what the reasoning would be. If you felt strongly about it, I guess you could start a new WP:RM. :-) I had no vested interest in the debate (I've only ever seen one episode!), just noted where it was going the several times it came up. — SMcCandlish    Talk⇒〈°⌊°〉 Contribs. 02:15, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
 * No, I'm definitely not going to start a new one :-) I'm always running into situtions when a link is overcapitalised; for a purely random example, see Quality of Life.  It's no worse than any other capitalisation error when the overcapitalised link redirects to the proper title, but when we have two articles whose titles are otherwise identical, it can be substantially more problematic.  It's not just an issue for links; it would be more convenient for most people who put "Quantum Leap" into the search box if it were a redirect to the disambiguation page.  Combine that with the fact that "Quantum Leap" (the title, not the subject of the article) can easily be confused with other items listed at Quantum leap and the fact that nobody's going to think that Quantum Leap (TV series) refers to anything except the TV series, and we're left with a situation that's less helpful for the general reader.  Nyttend (talk) 02:29, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I guess I can see that, though it is very common for us to not DAB titles if the capitalization already differentiates the work from the non-proper-name namesake. But I'm not sure what's "substantially problematic" about hatnotes and such. Someone looking for the scientific concept won't have their heads asplode if they first end up at the TV show article.  Always going to the DAB page when the capitalization is (usually intentionally) used just means that people trying explicitly to get to the TV show article  get there on the first try (a bit of a "scorched earth" or "poisoning the well" solution, like "if  can't get to the article I want on the first try  one can!").  I think it's unwise for us to try to optimize for people who either Capitalize Weirdly Like This Because They're Strange or PEOPLE WHO PAY NO ATTENTION TO UPPER OR LOWER CASE even proper names like texas and einstein, because they have difficulty typing.  Real life tends to be case-sensitive to a degree, and people like this are used to not always getting what they expect, just like people with terrible spelling. We have a criterion for speedy deletion of unlikely typos like "exersism" for "exorcism"  because there's little net value in trying to compensate for reader carelessness and it encourages careless editing when readers cross the reader/editor line. That said, it's probably not a big deal, and I guess the real solution is to find an album, song, or movie titled Quantum Leap and write an article about it; that would force disambiguation back to "Quantum Leap (TV series)". Heh. As long as it's notable, this wouldn't even be WP:POINTy. >;-)  — SMcCandlish    Talk⇒〈°⌊°〉 Contribs. 04:44, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

DRV notice
You participated in the discussion at Administrators' noticeboard, which occured following the closure of Templates for discussion/Log/2012 January 24. Be advised that I have opened Deletion review/Log/2012 February 27.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 05:34, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Christian Conservative Churches of North America
Every entry in that list was found in at least one of the encyclopedias of new religious movements I consulted in the preparation of the list. Unfortunately, as I didn't indicate exactly which source was used for each source, I would have to check them all to see which refers to it, and, in some cases, they were simply names included in a list. But, in general, I think Melton's Encyclopedia of American Religion might be one of the more likely sources for such information. John Carter (talk) 21:24, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

History merge
Hi, please merge the history of User:TopGun/sandbox (from this revision onwards ) to Pro-Pakistan sentiment. I've included the current stub in my draft so that the draft version can be restored on the article without clashes. -- lTopGunl (talk) 03:21, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Mereger?
Please explain why you merged an article which was deleted into this article? Most of it is OR and has no place in an article whatsoever. Darkness Shines (talk) 09:38, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Your history merge, in this case, caused a little problem, in my opinion. Please, note that I know you were acting with the best intentions, but you created a situation where Darkness Shines nominated Pakofilia for deletion; the article was deleted; he created a new version of the article without much of the OR and BLP violations the previous article suffered from. The version TopGun had in his sandbox, the one that you histmerged, once again contained many of those violations. And now Darkness Shines cannot remove them because of his interaction ban. As I've said, I don't doubt you were acting with the best intentions, but the history merge was a tad improvident... Salvio  Let's talk about it! 13:56, 1 March 2012 (UTC)


 * I request you undo your merger of an article which went thorough afd into a new article, I am still unable to edit an article I created and it still contains the rubbish which had the orginal article deleted. Darkness Shines (talk) 20:50, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Have you no response to this? Why do admins never admit they made a mistake and rectify it? Darkness Shines (talk) 16:14, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

Username change
HI! Ihope I am asking this question in the correct spot. You had helped me get to the correct place to request a new username. i requested it but it still has not been changed. any thoughts on how much time i should expect this to take? thank you.(AddictionPychologistFrank (talk) 14:16, 3 March 2012 (UTC)AddictionPychologistFrank)

Talkback
Magog the Ogre (talk) 19:51, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Hatcher Hughes.jpg
PD-US would be acceptable if I did not doubt very much that this picture was published before the critical date. IT appears that he only became sufficiently well known in 1924. I have no evidence save for a feeling un my water because of the very weird self promotional circumstances that surround the now blocked user who posted it. Over to wiser heads than mine :) Fiddle Faddle (talk) 17:03, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
 * However, the speedy deletion rationale you used is only valid for an image explicitly marked as noncommercial or no derivatives, and when you have no more evidence than that feeling, it's also not enough for a deletion as a copyvio. Your feelings are a very good rationale for nominating this image at WP:PUF or starting a deletion discussion, however.  Nyttend (talk) 17:26, 9 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Fair enough. FFD it shall be :) Wiser head prevailed Fiddle Faddle (talk) 17:28, 9 March 2012 (UTC)


 * If you wish to comment the discussion is at Possibly_unfree_files/2012_March_9 and is currently the sole discussion on the page. Naturally there is no obligation to comment ether way. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 17:35, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Fear of Buttons
You removed my speedy flag on the above with the edit summary "apparently just another term for koumpounophobia, and that's existed since October 2010. " Can you point me in the direction of the article  please ?  Velella  Velella Talk 20:06, 9 March 2012 (UTC)


 * See Koumpounophobia. Or if that's not what you meant, please clarify what you did mean.  Nyttend (talk) 01:02, 10 March 2012 (UTC)


 * No, that is exactly what I meant - this is a circular re-direct back to List of phobias. It has no content at all. Similarly Fear of buttons is also a circular re-direct. There is no content, nor has there ever been as far as I can determine - hence my speedy tag. Any thoughts ? Regards  Velella  Velella Talk 12:14, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
 * That's quite irrelevant to the issue of whether this is a hoax, and if you'd look at the history of K'phobia, you'd see that there indeed is context. Please take it to WP:RFD if you tire of the present redirect.  Nyttend (talk) 12:19, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Либерално-Демократска Партија
Hi Nyttend. Your edit summary point on removing the PROD tag from the above DAB Page accepted. However, as there is already a substantial DAB Page at Liberal Democratic Party, would you accept a redirect with ? Certainly makes sense as such, and keeps all the Liberal Democrats in one place. Let me know your thoughts. Best Regards --Haruth (talk) 00:02, 10 March 2012 (UTC)


 * No problem. The whole area of other languages on WikiPedia, and what is right / wrong in dealing with them, is completely new to me (stumbled across it in DAB cleanup using Dab Solver). Thank you for the clarification - much appreciated. Best Regards. --Haruth (talk) 00:22, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 10
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * National Register of Historic Places listings in Downtown Davenport, Iowa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Davenport


 * National Register of Historic Places listings in east Davenport, Iowa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Davenport


 * National Register of Historic Places listings in west Davenport, Iowa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Davenport

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:30, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

N. T. Rama Rao and Chief Ministership of N. T. Rama Rao
Can you do me a favour and put these on your watchlist. The editor Moviehub and his IP address keep removing the political content and restoring bare urls to non reliable sources, fails to understand that the article should summarise both political and film career. He also fails to understand that the using the fairuse image and infobox image in his political article is a violation of policy. He appears to be engaged in an edit war.♦ Dr. Blofeld  13:21, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Yes that is it, I only started it as another pusher kept restoring the scruffy point list in his main article and in the end I got fed up and compromised by splitting. The article is a fork and most certainly is not a reason to remove any mention of his political career in his biography. I think I'll put his Chief Ministership article up for AFD as its causing major problems. I have a lot of work today with GAs and I think I'm gonna scream if I have to continue reverting him!♦ Dr. Blofeld  13:32, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

He removed my message to him and continues to revert here. We're now into 5RR. He keeps restoring bare urls and removing the political content and despite my efforts to get him to stop and discuss on the talk page he continues. I spent a lot of time sourcing it properly and cleaning it up and now it has no mention of his political life and a buc nch of scruffy urls.♦ Dr. Blofeld  13:35, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Request by Moviehub
I request your kind self, to combine and merge both political career, cinema career and cheif minister ship of NT Rama Rao into a single section. Political career and cheif minister ship are all the same. (Moviehub (talk) 13:38, 10 March 2012 (UTC)).


 * I have no idea about bare URL's, I just went through his non-constructive removal of content. (Moviehub (talk) 13:39, 10 March 2012 (UTC)).


 * That is what is my idea, If possible, please combine both articles into one, I think there is lot of Original Research in Chief minister ship of NTR article. (Moviehub (talk) 13:59, 10 March 2012 (UTC)).

The Chief Ministership article is a POV magnet for sure and should be deleted. But ignoring his political career in his biogrpahy is NOT the way to go about it. I suggested to you Moviehub a way to help improve his article and you removed my post to you and continued to revert. You are now subject to a sockpuppet investigation. As for "non-constructive removal of content" if you actually look at the editing history you'll see a -15 kb by your name.♦ Dr. Blofeld  14:04, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Oh I know, I'm talking to Moviehub as he removes my messages to him!! but this sort of thing is a major problem for regulars on here. A similar thing happened a week or two ago with Gobichettipalayam when an editor kept removing content and insisting on sub articles and it went to 3RR. I reported it and awaited patiently for an admin to revert the edits back to version I had sourced and cleaned up yet nobody would do anything and Mooriddengirl said the same thing about being "involved" so unable to take action. In the end I reverted again myself and was disappointed nobody would look into it. The problem like this seems to occur over edits which are not vandalism but still degrade the quality of the article. I'm sure this happens to quite a lot of the regulars and its frustrating to deal with. And because they are so persistent with the reverting its difficult to try to appraoch them and discuss it because they label you a "vandal". I'm of the opinion that in such cases, which are not blatant vandalism, but poor edits, that the regular editors should be entrusted to block out persistent reverts by newbies and we should all generally assume good faith in their knowledge of the article. I was thinking of proposing something but no doubts the "lets be kind to newbies" approach despite them running all over us would interfere with it..♦ Dr. Blofeld  14:11, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Replied on my talk page, thanks.♦ Dr. Blofeld  15:49, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Oops sorry I replaced NTR with Rama Rao and is messed some words up and reverted it, feel free to make your edits now! Duh, LOL, yeah that's OK now, thanks!♦ Dr. Blofeld  16:13, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Chuckle. Thanks I appreciate it. But you see how long it took to cleanup the coup section which had many controversial statements and source it properly. That's why I care when people start reverting and the quality starts to decline. No doubt this editor will return and continue to revert and claim I'm vandalising it. I'll make a note to get it up to GA level but it needs a tremendous amount of work and given that I'd never heard of him before stumbling across the POV article back in 2010... Perhaps then it might have more watchers and people wanting to preserve it.♦ Dr. Blofeld  16:24, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Well, he'd probably remove that like he removed our constructive messages. Feel free to edit the article now, I need a break and then I have a few GAs at GAN and GA review to do later which I was supposed to have done earlier but for the nonsense I had to deal with!.♦  Dr. Blofeld  16:37, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

More POV. This is riddled with POV and completed unsourced. Whilst interesting, do you think it should be permitted? If you read it you'll learn more about Andhra Pradesh's legendary status in the cultural aspects than actually went on there historically. I'm not disputing that something encyclopedic could be written about its cultural history but it should be encyclopedic and sourced and not contain glorifying words and phrases on most lines. Any opinion?♦ Dr. Blofeld  19:09, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

The problem is that the text exaggerates the success of it and is misleading. It sounds like it is written by a tourist guide promoting tourism and ranting on about how the industry is world class and such. I have no objections to the occasional old style wording but not when you come away with more subjective than factual information. One could completely reword and source it perhaps but I'm not sure it is really suitable. I suspect he'll continue to revert and once again it'll be left to be to clean it up and source it.. ♦ Dr. Blofeld  19:17, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Can you believe our friend had 60 odd socket puppet accounts Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Padmalakshmisx!♦ Dr. Blofeld  19:42, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Republic of China article
Since you have previously shared your view regarding a naming convention about the Republic of China, I guess you are interested to share your view at Talk:Republic of China#Requested Move (February 2012). Thanks for your attention. 61.18.170.188 (talk) 10:40, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Jinbo Yoshikata
Hi! It's an elaborate hoax. See these results.  and The book, 戦国の合戦全録, used as a reference does not exist. See User talk:Nihonjoe, especially at the last entry of mine. Oda Mari (talk) 14:10, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi! Please see my responses at the same place. A questionable or mistaken citation is very different from a hoax. --BradTraylor (talk) 03:47, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Planck times at RFPP
Hi Nyttend. Is there any chance you could actually turn those "planck times" into something regular people can understand? It would be a big help not having to calculate how long a page was semi'd or protected for.  BarkingFish 23:23, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
<font style="background:white;" color="blue"> BarkingFish 23:31, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Siege of Homs
On Wikipedia:Requests for page protection you claim to have protected this article but I don't see any entry in the logs. Did you forget to push a button? Rmhermen (talk) 23:42, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Undo please
Hey, I think you accidentally deleted my user page by mistake. I meant to tag User:Fredddie/top under db-u1, not User:Fredddie. If I tagged the wrong page, oops! –Fredddie™ 03:27, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
 * ✅ --Rschen7754 03:37, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Non-penetrative sex article
As I stated at Requests for page protection, why bypass MuZemike's decision without asking him why he extended the block? Anyone can see from the article's edit history why he extended the block. There has been persistent WP:Sockpuppetry on that article, with the sockpuppet coming back to make the same or close to the same (disputed) edits soon after obtaining another IP address or registered account, or soon after the lock on the article has lifted. Setting it to late April is too short. There is no doubt that this sockpuppet will be right back there socking not long after the 24th. But if he has to wait most of the year to edit the article, he might just get the point and give up thinking he can rule the article. Having the article full-protected for so long will not hurt the article, seeing as it is not high-traffic in views or editing. So we might as well full-protect it for a significantly long time instead of having to put up with the same sockpuppet every other day, week or month. 107.22.58.115 (talk) 05:22, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

thank you
for your kind intervention. The Condoleeza Rice of China is clearly notable in a way 5000 Pokemon figurines is not. -WikiSkeptic (talk) 07:13, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the ping!
I hadn't checked back! I'll get on it!--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 12:05, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

Re: Iron Law of Wikipedia?
Not on the Iron Law, although I'd like to revisit this issue. As of now I see that paper as rather narrow, and likely not stressing the limitations enough. That there was no Iron Law detected at WP:V does not mean that Iron Law does not exist elsewhere on Wikipedia. What that paper did, I hope, is to show that Iron Law does not affect all aspects of Wikipedia. But I am pretty sure the operations of AN(I)/ArbCom are affected by it. --<sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; talk to me 21:25, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The type of edits one makes may be an interesting determinant. You may know of editcounters; note those which give a nice breakdown of edits by namespace and run them on some users. Results can be interesting, but so far I have not done any real research on that, nor can I recall a paper that did so (at least, not off the top of my head). But check latest Signpost edition on research (~2 weeks ago; or the one before that...); there was a very interesting paper looking at the language used by admins and non-admins, and how it influences relationships between the editors. Unconsciously (AGF...), most admins do use language to distinguish themselves from non-admins, display their power, and enforce authority and obedience. --<sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; talk to me 01:26, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Heh, I am 2/3 done with coding various data from WP:SOPA. Started on Feb 1, hopefully will be done by April 1. And also hopefully I'll have something interesting to present when I am done :) --<sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; talk to me 01:42, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

IN Historical Markers
After considering your comments, I think you did choose the most appropriate photo. The article is about the list of markers, and so something actually showing a marker is best. The one you chose at least is framed by a scenic green background. The one of the Cairo Skywatch Tower would be too small at 100x100px and has a less pleasant backdrop. Probably best as is. Cbl62 (talk) 04:48, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm an employee of the IHB--I noticed your edits and this conversation as part of my monitoring of all things "Indiana Historical Bureau" on the web. It looks like you or Cbl162 may be having some trouble obtaining photos of more recent Indiana State Historical Markers due to copyright concerns.  We conduct a visual inventory of markers for each county at least once every 4 years and keep images on file.  If you are looking for images of particular markers, I'd be happy to help get you some scans!  Aroseformo (talk) 20:30, 21 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Indiana State Historical Markers are the property of the State of Indiana. The research, texts, and images of markers are all public and in the public domain, as part of the Indiana State Historical Marker Program run by the Indiana Historical Bureau.  Starting this year, we'll be shifting a lot of our marker survey image intake (traditionally from a small group of volunteers) to Flickr, so any marker images this summer and beyond will come with Creative Commons licenses of their own based on the wishes of our expanded group of marker hunters, and higher resolution images than we display online will be available.  In the interim, once I figure out verbiage, I'll add a note to our website that specifies an attribution is all that is required on IHB content unless otherwise specified (the exceptions being IHB images of 'The Fall of Fort Sackville," Miami flag, and the Paul Hadley state banner).  Once our staff edits the statement for grammar and length, I'll put it up on our About Us page (http://www.in.gov/history/aboutus.htm), hopefully before the end of the month.  If there's anything else we can do to help with historical marker-related issues, let me know!  Aroseformo (talk) 14:55, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Administrator
Howdy! Since you're a Hoosier and an admin, I thought I'd ask you whether and when it would be wise for me to seek admin status. I had a feeling I might need to have made more edits, but maybe I'm wrong and I'd make a good candidate now. Any advice you have would be much appreciated.--YHoshua (talk) 21:13, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 17
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * List of Indiana state historical markers in Jefferson County (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Kent, Indiana and Lancaster, Indiana


 * List of Indiana state historical markers in Jasper County (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Remington

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

inre this discussion
I do appreciate that as the verifiable directorial debut of a notable person, this article meets a criteria of WP:NF, and that it does have coverage... but I ask that you take a look at this edit and consider that a "redirect" is pretty much okay for now just so long as there is no prejudice toward a recreation of the article if/when more sources become available AND as long as the returned article be properly sourced and maintain a properly neutral tone. Reasonable?  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 21:34, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Wikilinks when deleting articles
Hi. You deleted the Linda Grant redirect page. You did not, however, change all of the links to the new article name, leaving > 20 redlinks. I shall fix these, but this should checked before deleting. Cheers,  Nik the  stoned  12:57, 19 March 2012 (UTC) Hello, Nyttend. You have new messages at Nikthestoned's talk page. --14:27, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

Frank Worth
Hello! I see that you commented at the AfD discussion Articles for deletion/Frank worth. That article has now been completely rewritten, just in case you want to take a second look at it. Thanks. --MelanieN (talk) 02:35, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Address Restricted logo
Hello Nyttend. I notice that you recently deleted the Access Restricted logo from two locations in the National Register of Historic Places listings in Harrison County, Mississippi. Since the Access Restricted logo appears on at least 46 other National Register of Historic Places listings within en.wikipedia.org (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Address_restricted.PNG ), was there some particular reason for deleting the logo from the Harrison County listings? Thanks. Woodlot (talk) 12:49, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

DYK for List of Indiana state historical markers
Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:03, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Thanks 2
I was fiddling with the stupid upload wizard for 10 minutes, trying to upload a local copy. I am so incompetent file-wise I could cry. --Floquenbeam (talk) 01:19, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. It's not that hard if you ignore the wizard; I've never figured it out either, so I use the following steps: (1) Simply take the basic attribution data (with links, in this case) from the Commons file and copy them into a Notepad file; (2) Download the maximum resolution of the Commons file; (3) Go to Special:Upload, find the downloaded file on your hard drive, and click it; (4) Copy/paste the contents of the Notepad file into the big text box; (5) Click the bottom of the page that actually uploads the file; (6) Protect the file for however long it's supposed to be on the Main Page.  Nyttend (talk) 01:23, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm going to have to experiment with that; it seems shameful for an admin not to know how to upload a file. And, would the main page cascading protection work if you upload a local copy?  Or do you have to actually protect the image? --Floquenbeam (talk) 01:39, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
 * I've never figured out cascading protection; easier just to protect the image and be sure. Nyttend (talk) 01:47, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
 * I salvaged my pride a little; the version you uploaded locally was missing some periods, so I tweaked the TFA blurb accordingly. So I did something useful in all this. Thanks again, and cheers. --Floquenbeam (talk) 01:50, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
 * You win :-) When I download an image for transfer to a different WMF site, I'll just accept the filename that the system gives, since I'm normally uploading under the same filename.  This situation was no different, but it appears that my computer chopped out the extra periods for no reason that I can understand.  Nyttend (talk) 01:53, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
 * FYI: see WP:AN, it appears I panicked for no reason. --Floquenbeam (talk) 02:09, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Re: your edit summary on Template:NoCommons
You asked "why was this deleted instead of being redirected [like Template:Nocommons]?".

It looks Template:Nocommons was originally a redirect to Template:NoCommons. After Templates for discussion/Log/2011 September 27, Template:NoCommons was redirected to Template:Keep local, and a bot then updated Template:Nocommons to fix the double redirect. Then someone bypassed all the uses of the Template:NoCommons redirect, and then they filed another TFD at Templates for discussion/Log/2012 January 9 to get the redirect deleted. But when they did that, no one noticed that Template:Nocommons existed or they probably would have deleted that one too.

I don't care either way (so I won't bother doing anything about it myself), but it might be equally appropriate to delete both redirects per the second TFD. Anomie⚔ 16:38, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

User:Tsuchiya Hikaru
...is emptying categories out of process again. I've spotted Category:Lists of tallest buildings‎, Category:Lists of tallest structures‎, and Category:Lists of tallest structures by region‎, and it's entirely possible that there are others. I see you've encountered this behavior in the past. Do you want to handle this instance, too? - Eureka Lott 01:02, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
 * He shows the same behavior on several other wikis. I blocked him on bs.wiki, but a global lock could be a solution. Thanks for the info. --WizardOfOz (talk) 09:08, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
 * I´ve requested a global lock. --WizardOfOz (talk) 09:54, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
 * No we don´t have a page like that, but nearly all sysops are watching carsija. I informed the user about the global lock request on his home project, let us see what kind of answer does he have. Kind regards --WizardOfOz (talk) 17:16, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Luscombe 8A N71888 near Pheonix, AZ.jpg
Ok, this file is present since 2008. However what would be the purpose of this redirect? It is just a typo, and moreover no pages on the English Wikipedia link to this redirect! Greetings.  A ngelus (talk) 22:18, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Ok I understand, but the link that you have reported is a simple reference to history!  A ngelus (talk) 22:30, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Ok, thank you and best regards.  A ngelus (talk) 23:01, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
 * I simply raised the issue to the attention of another administrator. If he had thought proper to keep an orphan redirect, result of a typo, he would have confirmed your thesis and I would stop there.  A ngelus (talk) 23:23, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
 * But anyway he, unlike you, after my simple message, considered the redirect appropriate to be speedy deleted. Greetings.  A ngelus (talk) 23:35, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I did not know the existence of this page. Next time, in case of deletion request declined, I will use it. Thank you. Sorry for the inconvenience. Good night.  A ngelus (talk) 23:45, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Edit notice coding
Here is link in my sandbox to edit notice coding i want: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Misconceptions2/sandbox1 --Misconceptions2 (talk) 00:01, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

It would be grateful
if you could take a look at this. Thank you. Oda Mari (talk) 09:43, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

gallantry
Hi Nyttend,

thank you for your investigation in War of the Pacific. I answered your contribution, correct mine and would like to know your opinion about the content of the dispute. --Best regards, Keysanger (what?) 12:19, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

How many Lollards?
Is there any estimates of how many Lollards there were in the Fourteenth Century?--Doug Coldwell talk 12:33, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
 * At what point? Or do you mean how many people overall would have self-identified as Lollards during any point in the century?  Nyttend (talk) 15:16, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
 * During John Wycliffe's lifetime. Or perhaps how many "key" Lollards working directly for Wycliffe?--Doug Coldwell talk 22:00, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

To keep the thread all in one spot I brought back your question here:

I'm still not clear what you're asking. Do you mean "Of all the people who lived during the fourteenth century, how many of them would have identified as Lollards at some point in their lives?" Or are you meaning "If there had been a 100%-accurate religious census of England, how many Lollards would it have found?" If the second is your meaning, you need to specify which point in time you're asking about. Nyttend (talk) 00:47, 28 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Let me see if I can be more specific: A time period when the English version of the Wycliffe Bible came out of 1382-1395.--Doug Coldwell talk 11:20, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Henry Knighton writes that those voicing Church complaints and echoing the principles of Wycliffe in 1382, hence being associated with the principles of the Lollards, was every second man in the British Isles. --Doug Coldwell talk 15:11, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
GB fan 02:39, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

In regards to Denver
Hello.

Firstly, I'd like to thank you for helping me with the difficulty I was having with, who was removing legitimate, valid information which I was adding, without explaining, and, by the way, in your edit summary, you stated "Dpm". I'm simply curious as to what that stands for.

Also, since you are an administrator, is it possible that you could review my text file and add the reference to the whitelist, or do you believe that the link should not be included in Wikipedia? My problem was, that I used that as a reference for at least some of the information I added there, in addition to using the articles GNIS and the National Elevation Dataset as references for the statement, given that the NWS point forecast shows it to be 5278 feet on its map (which is likely sourced from that) as well as in light of what was stated on the talk page (see bottom section).

Please let me know if you have any additional information regarding this, and thanks in advance for your help. Note that my IP address is different now than it was when I edited the page, as I'm on a different computer. 70.248.184.229 (talk) 23:07, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Dpm doesn't stand for anything: it's a mistake for don`t. If you look at my second edit, you'll see that my edit summary refers to changes that I made in the first edit.  I had put my fingers too far right on the keyboard: I typed "p" instead of "o", "m" instead of "n", and then I ended the edit summary by hitting Enter instead of typing the apostrophe key.  I was planning to say something along the lines of "Don't delete valid information".


 * As far as the whitelist: I definitely will not. Proper changes to the whitelist require a decent understanding of regex, and an admin who modifies it without understanding regex risks breaking the whitelist completely.  I don't understand regex at all, so I would be a very bad candidate for implementing your changes.  Please feel free to request that another admin do it, whether at the administrators' noticeboard or at a specific administrator's talk page.  I think that there's a better place to request the change, but I can't find it — I'm at a motel, and their Internet is about as slow as dialup, so I'm unable to look for pages that would be better.  I attempted to leave this response immediately after leaving the talkback at your talk page, but it's taken me until now, over half an hour, for this message finally to be posted.  Nyttend (talk) 02:41, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
 * I must thank you for your assistance, and I hope that I did not cause you too much trouble. Thanks. Back on first computer. 75.53.218.81 (talk) 21:58, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

Help us develop better software!
Thanks to all of you for commenting on the NOINDEX RfC :). It's always great to be able to field questions like these to the community; it's genuinely the highlight of my work! The NOINDEX idea sprung from our New Page Triage discussion; we're developing a new patrolling interface for new articles, and we want your input like never before :). So if you haven't already seen it, please go there, take a look at the screenshots and mockups and ideas, and add any comments or suggestions you might have to the talkpage. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 16:43, 30 March 2012 (UTC)