User talk:Nz101/Archive 1

 Hello Nz101, and Welcome to Wikipedia!  Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

--- Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:


 * Table of Contents


 * Department directory

Need help?


 * Questions — a guide on where to ask questions.
 * Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes.
 * Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations


 * Article Wizard — a Wizard to help you create articles
 * The Simplified Ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules.
 * Guide to Wikipedia — A thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia.

How you can help:


 * Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help.


 * Community Portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity.

Additional tips...


 * Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes ( ~ ). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The [[Image:Signature_icon.png]] or [[File:Insert-signature.png]] button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.


 * If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

Nz101, good luck, and have fun. --Silent Bob (talk) 10:45, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

Non-free files in your user space
Hey there Nz101, thank you for your contributions. I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:Nz101/Userboxes/Metro1. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.


 * See a log of files removed today here.


 * Shut off the bot here.


 * Report errors here.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:05, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Leopard Coachlines Ltd for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Leopard Coachlines Ltd, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Leopard Coachlines Ltd until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Kudpung (talk) 04:19, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 December 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 02:32, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 December 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 13:00, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Christchurch Bus Services Ltd
Another editor has added the  template to the article Christchurch Bus Services Ltd, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the  template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Eastmain (talk • contribs) 18:48, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Go Bus Christchurch Ltd
Another editor has added the  template to the article Go Bus Christchurch Ltd, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the  template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Eastmain (talk • contribs) 18:48, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Cecil Lay
Hi Nz101. I removed the speedy deletion tag you put on this article because it had a credible assertion of notability (being a national politician).  Them From  Space  01:06, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Hey thanks for alerting me to this, Ill remember this for next time I tag things for deletion. Thanks Nz101 - Talk :: Contribs 05:27, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 3 January 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 00:55, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 January 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 05:31, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 January 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 19:11, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

Maurice le Brun, 1st Baron Brun
I removed your speedy deletion tag from this article, as there's a credible assertion of notability (i.e. him being a Baron), and therefore speedy deletion is inappropriate. If you feel that it should be deleted, AFD is the more appropriate venue. -Hit bull, win steak(Moo!) 15:03, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
 * My apologies. I suppose I was judging on article quality/what I considered to be a notable person. Nz101 - Talk :: Contribs 21:37, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Talkback
-- Bk314159 (Talk to me and find out what I've done) 20:36, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 January 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 01:17, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 January 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 02:12, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 7 February 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 01:45, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 February 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 01:59, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 February 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 18:08, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 February 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 01:27, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 7 March 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 14:58, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 March 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 01:28, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 March 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 01:16, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

GOM Player
I am confused by your edit. You have changed and overly wordy and awkward, but accurate sentence into: "GOM Player has also been accused of violating GPL", which is largely inaccurate.

1. The primary issue has to do with LGPL code. (There is an addition possible issue with GPL code, but no one has ever claimed that with certainty) 2. The primary issue is that Gretech *claims copyright* over the code, this is not about a term of the license, Gretech is claiming they own (i.e. are not licensed the code). 3. A piece of software can not violate a legal agreement covering distribution of software, Gretech would be the ones violating the license agreement. 24.69.74.10 (talk) 07:32, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I have shortened the introduction. Nothing has been changed in the section about it. I encourage you to go ahead and modify it to reflect the truth, I was going by the reference which stated 'GPL' as a violation. Thanks, Nz101 - Talk :: Contribs 07:35, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 March 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 01:26, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

Reverting my Edits?
Please note that the edit to St._Peter%27s_Roman_Catholic_Church,_New_York was not vandalism. I was actually reverting vandalism and it appears I was tagged by a bot and my entirely constructive changes were reverted. In reverting my entirely constructive edits, you're helping to support vandalism on Wikipedia. Good job. =)

Oh, also, you got the website wrong when you put it back up. It's stpetersrcnyc.org but I guess I should let you change it since my changes will just be reverted as vandalism. 128.208.59.52 (talk) 06:06, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Apologies! I reverted your removal of content as you did not specify why you actually removed it in the edit summary (except saying 'rvv', something I have never seen before). Next time to avoid any reverting of edits and warnings, ensure you add a reason, otherwise it will be treated as removal of content. Thanks for helping make wikipedia better though :) Nz101 - Talk :: Contribs 05:41, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 April 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 01:19, 5 April 2011 (UTC)