User talk:Nz researcher

Welcome!
Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. If you would like to experiment with Wikipedia, I personally invite you to do so in my own sandbox (just follow the simple rules!). Again, welcome! &mdash; ßottesiηi  Tell me what's up 20:19, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style


 * I think your contributions would get a much friendlier reception if you would read Help:Edit summary and Citing sources, and follow the advice there. This is especially important for articles on controversial topics such as Peter Hugh McGregor Ellis. -- Avenue 03:35, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

Thomas Eichelbaum
Hi, I've reverted you edits on the above since they were gettign away from NPOV. Also you seem to have lost all the formatting that was previously in the article. Can you please be a little more careful with further edits. Also much of what you say can probably go into the main Peter Ellis article. - SimonLyall 22:43, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

Neutral point of view.
Hi You obvously have strong views on the Ellis case. However please remember that Wikipedia has to have a neutral point of view in it's articles. See WP:NPOV. Also it might help if you discuss some of your edits on the talk pages or at least make an edit summary with you edits. - SimonLyall 01:18, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

Shrug
I guess you arn't talking. Dont worry other people will keep cleaning up the articles just as fast as you make your edits. BTW you last edit screwed up the link and other stuff. - SimonLyall 01:30, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

Hi there
I've noticed that your signature goes to NZ Researhcer, it should point to User:Nz researcher. While this may seem a bit pediantic, keeping the User space seperate from the article space is important. Could you change your signature please on the "my preferences" page? Cheers --Midnighttonight 00:38, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

Three-revert rule
Just some friendly advice: if you are tempted to edit the Thomas Eichelbaum article again before 08:41, 1 May 2006 (NZ time), you'd probably be wise to read Three-revert rule first, since you might be in danger of breaking this rule. -- Avenue 11:27, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

Multiple user accounts
Hi, I just noticed that there seems to be another account (User:NZ researcher) with a very similar name to this one. Given that both seem to making similar edits to the Thomas Eichelbaum article, this leads me to think you might have two accounts. If so, you might like to read Sock puppetry, and consider using one of the tags described there. I posted a similar message on the other account, but you'd only need to tag one of them.

Just to be clear, I'm not accusing you of doing anything wrong. (Given the similarities in the account names, it seems pretty obvious there was no intent of using them for sock puppetry.) I'm just suggesting a way of protecting yourself from any possible future accusations. -- Avenue 11:51, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

Why did you delete Sim's reasons?
Hi again. In this edit, you deleted the reasons Val Sim gave for discounting Ceci and other experts which I had recently added to the Peter Ellis article. However you did not give any reason for this in your edit summary or on the article's talk page, so I am unsure why you did this. Can you please explain this to me? -- Avenue 07:31, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)