User talk:Nzfrog

October 2016
Your recent editing history at University of Canterbury shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.''If you want to add this material, it needs to be supported by a reliable secondary source which establishes that this is a rating system with particular limitations, especially in regards to this university. Eg, has the NZ media flagged this rating as being in any way problematic? The reliable secondary source currently in the article did not see fit to include any provisos. Please stop edit warring and adding sources which don't support the claims being made here. Also, please do not edit war using an IP account: this could be seen as sockpuppetry.'' Thank you, Nick-D (talk) 07:00, 31 October 2016 (UTC)