User talk:O/Archive 04

They're Red Hot
Yo. Before I edited there was way too much info on the fact that the Red Hot Chilli Peppers did a short skittish cover of what is a fairly amazing song all things considered. No encyclopedia would include information that a cover of a 1930's song by an incredibly infuential blues player was recorded 'on a hill outside the mansion at 2am'. I mean, for a start, 'the' mansion? The stuff about the guitarist being influenced by Johnson is so irrelevent. It's barely worth mentioning that the RHCP did a cover, all the album info and stuff is ridiculous, a separate page for the RHCP cover should be created if all that info is really necessary - this is about the song not the RHCP's cover of it. It's an amazing piece of work and I think it's devalued when discussed only as a song that happened to be covered by X. I was removing content but content I felt was not appropriate for that article and clearly editted in by some RHCP fan who is not thinking objectively. Cheers M —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.41.4.119 (talk) 02:00, 26 January 2007 (UTC).

...
Oh, all the categories as well. They're Red Hot is not a '1990's rock song'. The RHCP album information at the bottom, I mean,can you not see what's wrong with that? That article pretty much sums up what I hate about wikipedia.

Adambear8888
hi —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Adambear8888 (talk • contribs).

Signpost updated for January 29th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 18:58, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

PA 43
If you could, please take a look at Talk:Pennsylvania Route 43, where I'm locked in an editing dispute with an anon. The argument revolves around the differences between my exit list and the one made the anon. Both are in the page's edit history. Thanks. -- T M F Let's Go Mets - Stats 23:27, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Edit to New york high School
Nce Job on that edit —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Agwin12193 (talk • contribs) 20:53, 3 February 2007 (UTC).

Unblock is denied...
Here is why: --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 03:29, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
 * My concern is that it implies that this user is still a sock. The user is telling you that he has the power to eliminate the vandalism problem... which he would have only if he was the vandal, right? And furthermore, I strongly suspect that the user talk page is a hoax. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 03:35, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Furthermore, we have this diff as well, linking it to the IP address: That IP address vandalized your page within the same timeframe. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 03:38, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Personally, I believe that if JohnDoe15 is not a sock and genuinely wants to contribute, he can get another account. But I doubt that that is the case. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 03:42, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Look at all of the pleading on his talk page. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 06:47, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

I don't believe him. I think it's the vandal making up stuff. Note the message I left `on his talk page. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 04:07, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Novels newsletter : Issue IX - February 2007
Delivered by grafikbot 17:20, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Interstate 95 in Maryland
Oops. I was trying to find the rules on WP:IH, but I couldn't. No biggie though. I just figured it was just as useful as having it randomly placed in the article. Cheers! -- M PD T / C 00:55, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for February 5th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:34, 6 February 2007 (UTC)