User talk:OAFC h8 MUFC

A tag has been placed on Harlam and lee, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Ecoleetage (talk) 15:00, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Andrew Robert Lee
A tag has been placed on Andrew Robert Lee requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 16:08, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

June 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Andrew Robert Lee has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. NuclearWarfare (talk) 16:29, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Andrew Robert Lee constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. JaGa (talk) 16:31, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Andrew Robert Lee. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. JaGa (talk) 16:31, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Andrew Robert Lee. JaGa (talk) 16:35, 16 June 2008 (UTC)