User talk:OB19

Help me! IAM VERY CONCERN
Please help me with...

Good morning I have always admired Wikipedia, but I am now very concern of the misleading information that appears in one of your pages related to mind control. It is very serious to ignore scientific evidence that comes from respected neurological and medical sources related to the development of human body control by distance. The worst of all is that is not possible to add any other information, as the page appear " not POSIBLE to edit " The contains only shows an opinion and does not allow the reader to arrive to a conclusion as most important information is missing. Readers are not idiots, this behaviour will only discredit other contains that maybe is truth and less and less people will trust you. it can be the starting of the end! OB19 (talk) 12:02, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Good morning, which article in particular are you concerned about? And what information in that article is misleading? ~  ONUnicorn (Talk&#124;Contribs) problem solving 13:09, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Thank you to reply back. This https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_harassment. Is incredible how can be at this moment in time so much ignorance, or should I say distorted information specially having into account the existence of material proving the opposite which does not appear in the text or links, to make it worst Psychiatry, main stream, cannot be taken into account in this matter, as they are not specialist in any other field, and they are proving now for many years they are themselves a pseudoscience, some of them know they are a farse others are only ignorant. It is dangerous for discredit scientific proves only because we are not the victims, at the moment, bearing in mind that we can be the next ones. Discredit victims with a mental condition shows a very old trick in human history, but at the same time will only lead to worsten society in general, we cannot forget today is a "delusion" of someone strange to you, tomorrow is your daughter nightmare and therefore the destruction of her life and yours. It needs a lot of integrity and strength to confront the reality. I in good faith have decided to contact you because it matters what is happening! Thank you let me know if you need the sources. The minimum it can be done in that page is to present both sides of the story unless there are other interest for readers not to know the truth.


 * If you find yourself unable to edit a protected article, you can always request that an edit be made to that article for you. The proper way to do it is described at Edit requests; please read that information page carefully before making your edit request(s). 78.28.54.83 (talk) 18:16, 29 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi, this seems to be a fringe theory, which is appropriately described as such in the article. I recommend reading Reliable_sources. If you have suggestions on improving the article, please add them at Talk:Electronic harassment instead of editing the article directly. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:19, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

You are saying that the neurological advances that exist already today documented by scientific literature are untruth, you are saying that the European Union Committee related to this matter are a fraud? You are saying that involve Psychiatry in this matter is not trying to discourage further publishing? Specially knowing how much damage they have done and are doing to society with support from the Governments? How far this behaviour is going to be tolerated by the community? When enough people wakes up to this kind of torture and abuse to their on families the word riots will change their meaning! I will not like to be left in the hands of multitudes when their finally discover what is behind this! I believe in G_d which could be say is a theory not for that I have a delusion. This attitude towards the tortures to our own people in the past aloud the killing of millions of people during the holocaust which were not only Jews, each of us that close the eyes to abuse for convinience, not for ignorance can be seen as part of the same system and therefore responsible of that wrong doing. Still the article is not objective, does not comply with Wikipedia guidelines and it clearly shows a second intention to discourage people to look for so!utions, and disrespect the possible victims.
 * If the European Union has a committee that has released a report that is at odds with our article, please link to the report so that we can incorporate its findings into the article. If there are other reliable sources that you are aware of that are at odds with the article, please also link to them so that we can revise the article appropriately. ~  ONUnicorn (Talk&#124;Contribs) problem solving 19:59, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, OB19, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Please note that Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:20, 29 January 2019 (UTC)