User talk:OCDpatient

Problem with username
Hello,

Please read: WP:Welcome, WP:NUT and Username, with special attention to section 4 on inappropriate usernames. I will report your account to WP administrators here: WP:RFC/NAME tomorrow if you continue to post under this username.

Happy editing! - Amerique dialectics 00:09, 29 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Hey, this is to let you know I've gone ahead and reported your account here: WP:RFC/NAME. I've also been considering whether to report your repeated postings, ,, of non-notable information as direct violations of WP:3RR, but I'm putting that on hold to see how you respond to the RFC/NAME. You should consider this another warning.--Amerique dialectics 08:31, 29 January 2007 (UTC)


 * thanks for reporting me. great job, well done. I hope that you like my new edition. feel free to report more if you don't agree with me.


 * No problem. I'll do what I can to save some of your edits but I'm afraid a lot of them are out of line of policy or the WP:MOS. I suggest putting this behind you by getting another username and then working within consensus if you want to edit this article productively.--Amerique dialectics 09:09, 29 January 2007 (UTC)


 * yea, I have Obsessive-compulsive disorder, so bare with me. I hope that you don't have it. it is a bad habit which is hard to recover. the medicine that I take sometimes doesn't help.

Warning
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you.  Planetary Chaos  Talk to me  01:04, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

what is wrong with my edition? show me the part of the "vandalism" which I will be happy to change.

Please change your username
It is likely, based on the discussion so far at Requests for comment/User names, that this account is gooing to be blocked as a name violation of Username. I strongly recommend that you go to Changing username and request a new username. Possibilities include User:OCD, User:Ocd (capitalization does make a difference, with names), User:OCDP, and User:Ocdp, as well as an almost infinite number of other possibilities.

In general, you can check if a user exists by entering the following into the search box on the left side of the screen:

User:NameThatYouWantToCheckIfItExists

Please note that the wiki software is designed to prevent similar names from being created: if, for example, User:OcD existed (it doesn't), the system would (I believe) prevent User:OCD from being created.

If you have any questions on the above, please let me know. Thanks. -- John Broughton (☎☎) 18:42, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

why can't i call myself OCDpatient, because I am an OCD patient. and if i have cancer, i can't call myself cancer patient, either? I am not ashamed of myself having OCD. so why do you want to force me to change? --OCDpatient 20:44, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
 * If I may jump in, your name specifically violates this part of the username policy:
 * Names mentioning or referring to illnesses, disabilities, or conditions (e.g. AIDS, Amputation, Asperger syndrome, etc.) [are prohibited].
 * I hope that clarifies the problem. --Ginkgo100talk 21:03, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Sock evidence
It seems apparent from edits at that  is also User:OCDpatient. And I found edits strongly indicating that 61.6.47.6 is the same as the disruptive socks of. The edits are at, with a complicated edit history that is not made clear with just diffs. Here are examples of edits the two have in common that are not likely to be coincidental:

{| class="wikitable"
 * SummerThunder socks
 * 61.6.47.6
 * Reverted version
 * ==Background==
 * ==Background==
 * ==Background==

Great Leap Forward

 * ==Background==

Great Leap Forward

 * ==Background==

Great Leap Forward

 * == Beginning ==
 * == Beginning ==

1966: The 16 Points and the Red Guards

 * == Beginning ==

1966: The 16 Points and the Red Guards

 * == The Cultural Revolution ==

1966: The 16 Points and the Red Guards

 * This incident was later "politically rehabilitated" in the winter of 1978, and became known as the Qingming Tiananmen Square incident (not to be confused with the Tiananmen Square protests of 1989).
 * This incident was later "politically rehabilitated" in the winter of 1978, and became known as the Qingming Tiananmen Square incident (not to be confused with the Tiananmen Square protests of 1989).
 * This incident was later "politically rehabilitated" in the winter of 1978, and became known as the Qingming Tiananmen Square incident (not to be confused with the Tiananmen Square protests of 1989).
 * This incident was later "politically rehabilitated" in the winter of 1978, and became known as the Qingming Tiananmen Square incident (not to be confused with the Tiananmen Massacre).
 * }

Blocked indefinitely. --Ginkgo100talk 22:51, 29 January 2007 (UTC)