User talk:OGT90201

Conflict of Interest
Hello It would seem that you may have a WP:COI with this article: Hershey Felder; in addition, may have direct ties with the subject. Please note that it is necessary for you to disclose your connection with the subject. Your contribution history appears only for this article; which leads WP to believe that you may be the subject; since many of your edits are without sources or primary sources that are directly associated with the subject. Substantial edits as the ones you have just carried out should be brought to the article's Talk Page: Talk:Hershey Felder and asked of WP editors. In the future, your edits may be reverted. Please note that the article in question is not a place to update resume style information: WP:RESUME. Thank you. Maineartists (talk) 00:05, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Before any more edits to the article, please address the question of your relationship to the subject of the article. The evidence is that you created this article in 2008 and it is the only article you have ever edited. Having a conflict of interest, as in personally knowing the subject, does not preclude editing, but should be declared on your User page. A paid relationship MUST be declared. Undeclared paid can lead to an editor being indefinitely blocked from editing. David notMD (talk) 08:25, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
 * I appreciated your reply on my Talk page. All that is needed to put the COI and PAID questions to bed is for you to state here on your Talk page that you do not know HF personally and are in no way being compensated directly or indirectly for you decision to create and work on the article about him. Honor system applies. David notMD (talk) 16:42, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

I have enjoyed Hershey Felder's work since 2001. Many years ago, I met him while with a group of theatre fans and I have briefly spoken to him at a post-show CD signing. However, I am not paid (directly or indirectly) to contribute to his Wikipedia article. Since I follow his career and enjoy his productions, my only intention is to help ensure that his accomplishments are accurately represented. OGT90201 (talk) 18:39, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you for replying. Please be mindful that WP is not a resume WP:Resume; and most of your contributions are resume content. I overhauled this page a while back and only kept "encyclopedic" content with as many secondary sources as I could find (reviews mostly). Please be mindful that this is not a page to update Felder's every move or promote his career; and that content to its liking may be challenged or removed. Sources that are directly linked to the subject and / or sites that rely on self-published promotional material and information are not reliable; i.e. Broadway World, Subject's Website, Blogs (online diaries), promotional appearance previews, etc. If the content is deemed notable for inclusion, it should be backed by secondary sources: WP:USEPRIMARY. I hope this helps in moving forward. In regards to the mention of certain edits on David notMD's Talk Page: "It was only when a friend mentioned the somewhat negative tone of the article (as well as an odd concentration on atypical media coverage) that I chose to make the edits"; before my overhaul, the article did not have a WP:NPOV in regards to Felder, his career, and his performances. BLP articles must have a neutral point of view; taken from what the secondary sources write about the subject: positive or negative. Otherwise, WP would be filled with self-proclaimed praise content directly from the subject - and their admirers / fans - themselves. Let's keep the discussion open as to what is primary and secondary sources, encyclopedic content vs. resume style content, and a NPOV. Thanks. Maineartists (talk) 22:30, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

User:Quisqualis has since shortened the article by more than a third, which in my opinion brings it more in line with an encyclopaedic style. David notMD (talk) 12:37, 21 January 2020 (UTC)