User talk:OG Shawn

A tag has been placed on your user page, User:, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person, and which is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages: user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for businesses.

If you can indicate why the page is not blatant advertising, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to your user talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also edit this page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Peridon (talk) 20:34, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Spam
No matter how old the business or how widespread (I have a couple of Santech products myself), this article is pure spam in appearance. Please look at WP:SPAM and WP:NPOV. The first is self-explanatory. The second is about neutral point of view, which is difficult to achieve when you are connected with a subject. I would also suggest looking at WP:COI, our policy on conflict of interest. Please forgive me for being cynical if you are really creating this article for Santech out of the goodness of your heart. We see little of that here... Peridon (talk) 20:52, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Apart from the above, it seems to have been deleted as a copyright violation. Please look at WP:COPYVIO as well. Thanks. Peridon (talk) 20:54, 8 March 2011 (UTC)