User talk:OHH1987

Nomination of Schism: 1549 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Schism: 1549 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Schism: 1549 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Blackguard 21:44, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

March 2015
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Prayer Book Rebellion. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. -- Finngall  talk  22:09, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Schism 1549 (Novel - Prayer Book Rebellion)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Schism 1549 (Novel - Prayer Book Rebellion), and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Schism: 1549. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page&mdash; you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:22, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I'm ToonLucas22. I noticed that you recently removed all content from Schism: 1549 with this edit without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, I restored the page's content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ToonLucas22 (talk) 22:35, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
 * He's requesting deletion of his own article, as he'd explicitly stated at the AfD page. It's all good.  -- Finngall   talk  22:38, 18 March 2015 (UTC)