User talk:OI-11-j.castellano

February 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. 50.131.220.134 (talk) 07:58, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Hello OI-11-j.castellano and welcome to Wikipedia. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please remember to disclose these connections. Dori ☾Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 06:00, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ataria


A tag has been placed on Ataria requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 17:22, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/OI-11-a.gainzarain for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 17:25, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Hello
Welcome to en.wikipedia.org! Have fun; bobrayner (talk) 15:20, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Are you editing as part of a school/university project? If so, please reply here or on my talkpage. I'm glad that you want to contribute, but en.wikipedia has some complex rules which can be difficult for new editors - we'd like to help you work within these rules.
 * School projects face some specific problems so it's a good idea for the tutor/instructor to talk to us first - please ask them to contact me or read this.

March 2012
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Ataria, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 15:16, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Ataria, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 15:37, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Ataria for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ataria is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ataria until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 15:42, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Ataria. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 01:29, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Ataria, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 20:54, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Ataria for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ataria is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ataria (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 22:16, 22 April 2012 (UTC)