User talk:OKMG-1200

December 2020
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to List of active separatist movements in Asia—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 09:43, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
 * , Thank you for letting me know, I removed these parts because most of these movements do not exist at all, or they are Irridentist movements that are not based on Saudi Arabia and are not Saudi Nationals. There is one movement called Ahrar Najran which is an alleged movement that all the information about it comes exclusively from Iranian or Pro-Iranian sources.

January 2020
Hello, I'm Mr.User200. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Saudi Arabian-led intervention in Yemen—because it did not appear constructive. Zenith Magazine is a independent German media with content that focuses in the Islamic World. Also in your edit summary you said that the source is old, something that is not true. It only have less that a year, and the conflict have more than 5 years old. So please stop making disruptive edits and reverts on Saudi Arabia or Islamic World articles. Thanks. Mr.User200 (talk) 16:02, 23 January 2021 (UTC)


 * , The Zenith article clearly states that the KSA is, in the author's opinion, defeated and will surrender, that's a clear bias. Also, I said it is old because (as of 2021) Saudi Arabia didn't disengage from the war. OKMG-1200 (talk) 16:14, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * The context of the information added fit the criteria, the preceding paragraph says that the war is in "military stalemate for years", thats clear. And there is nothing extraordinary in adding the part you reverted. Is a author opinion and not labeled as a reality. Quote: "it is said", KSA is searching for an exit strategy, "humanitarian gesture", "instead of a surrender". What I see here, in most of your edits is a push toward a certain POV. Mr.User200 (talk) 16:23, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * But actually the source says political and military defeat, not surrender. That is much different. I´m correcting that.Mr.User200 (talk) 16:26, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I am not trying to make POV push, I am trying to reestablish balance. In many articles that talk about the Islamic world, Saudi Arabia, GCC, Egypt, and Turkey there is a clear bias. Especially when it comes to Saudi-Iran proxy war and its related articles. OKMG-1200 (talk) 16:32, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Ok, I agree with the fact there is clear white-black bias. And agree than that part placed at the openning, is clearly un-neutral. Look at my curent change, whats your opinion?.Mr.User200 (talk) 16:42, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

February 2021
Hello, I'm Mr.User200. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Ma'rib Campaign—because it did not appear constructive. Despite the allegation of involvement is not corroborated by another source, to errase a whole paragraph, including text not related to the issue, is disruptive. Also it looks that another Anon IP was making changes on the Article, You should have reverted him not all my edits. Thanks. Mr.User200 (talk) 02:15, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

February 2021
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Ma'rib Campaign, on February 22 events. To errase a part of the content because WP:IDONTLIKEIT and change to another completetly different is disruptive editing. Caution for POV pushing in numbers and unexplained removal of content, with a deliberately misleading edit summary.Mr.User200 (talk) 15:23, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Note
Hello, I'm User:Shadow4dark. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to 2020-2021 al-Jawf offensive—because it did not appear constructive. If you want to redirect content that belongs to another article just move or redirect the content instead of errasing. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Shadow4dark (talk) 15:42, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Why did you not move it? Shadow4dark (talk) 15:43, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
 * it is already writen there in Ma'rib Campaign article, please check. OKMG-1200 (talk) 15:52, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Ok done but you should use more on talkpage and explain it before deleting it. Shadow4dark (talk) 15:57, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I will do so next time. Could you please remove it again.OKMG-1200 (talk) 16:02, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Done but i think both pages need be merged.Shadow4dark (talk) 16:03, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

March 2021
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to errase others editors contributions like you did here, you may be blocked from editing. This warning comes after a series of several reverts made on Yemen related articles. Mr.User200 (talk) 16:54, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , the edit contains biased claims about AQAP participation. I think we had this discussion before. Didn't we?

the Editor should have used disclaimers and clearly stated that these are allegations coming from pro-Houthi sources, and not confirmed by any independent and neutral sources. OKMG-1200 (talk) 17:25, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

March 2021
Hello OKMG-1200, please stop reintroducing duplicated information like you did here. Events cant be added two times since its not Encyclopedic and can cause problems with the readers.Mr.User200 (talk) 18:46, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

saudi
You have no right to delete Saudi content. You must first post on the discussion page and get the consent of at least 5 people. Arbitrary removal (as a Saudi user) is against the law. Your work violates neutrality. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alsocome (talk • contribs) 10:42, 26 February 2022 (UTC)


 * @Alsocome Please explain your comment above Arbitrary removal (as a Saudi user) is against the law. Mako001 (C) (T)  12:54, 26 February 2022 (UTC)


 * @Mako001 The South Azerbaijan movement is not active inside Iran. Note the recent edits to this article. An IP and several other accounts frequently deleted content related to Saudi Arabia, adding the two movements (South Azerbaijan and Baluchistan). The Baloch movement is currently active only in Pakistan. But this user is trying to delete the Saudi content and add two inactive movements to the Iranian section with different accounts. Is this correct?  — Preceding undated comment added 12:58, 26 February 2022 (UTC) by User:Alsocome
 * I didn't mean that part, I meant the part where you say it is "against the law". it might be against Wikipedia policy to conduct undisclosed paid editing, but it is another thing entirely to say it is against the law. You should read Wikipedia's policy on making legal threats, as you run the risk of getting blocked by saying that sort of thing. Mako001 (C) (T)  13:08, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

The South Azerbaijan Movement is a multi-member group. Spending multiple multiplayer sites is not a valid source. Look at the article. Active, active and separatist. This group (assuming there is an annexationist, not a separatist). He has another article. In the case of Balochistan, this movement is not active at the moment. It was closed in 2012 and is only active in Pakistan.

Just sending a link is not a valid source. Resources must be acceptable. Not that each group creates its own site and you link to it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alsocome (talk • contribs) 10:54, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

Hi, I have seen your discussion here. I have explained everything in the talk page and I pinged you there. Alsocome is making POV pushes and personal attacks against me. Alsocome claimed that I am Saudi just because I removed Saudi Arabia section You should know that I removed from the same article parts related to Israel and Russia. So, does that make Israeli and Russian at the same time. OKMG-1200 (talk) 13:30, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

your Sabotage
He removes all content related to Saudi Arabia and writes articles against the countries with which he is involved (Iran and Yemen). I explained to him that the movements he had added were inactive and that the resources were from the personal sites of several multi-member groups. But he insists on sabotaging himself. He has repeatedly deleted Saudi content. See its edit history. I looked carefully and realized. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alsocome (talk • contribs) 12:50, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

Did you get money from Bin Salman to edit against the countries you are at war with? If the answer is yes, it is against the rules. The last warning is to you. You have no right to delete or add without discussing on the article discussion page. Your position is biased and you are suspicious of monetary editing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alsocome (talk • contribs) 12:52, 26 February 2022 (UTC)


 * I'd suggest you try to assume good faith. Mako001 (C) (T)  13:00, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

February 2023
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Diriyah, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Remember: Wikipedia is not censored. GenoV84 (talk) 19:40, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

March 2023
Hello, I'm GenoV84. I noticed that you removed topically-relevant content from Destruction of early Islamic heritage sites in Saudi Arabia. However, Wikipedia is not censored. Please do not remove or censor information that directly relates to the subject of the article. If the content in question involves images, you have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide images that you may find offensive. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. GenoV84 (talk) 22:30, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

June 2023
Hello, I'm Egeymi. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Egeymi (talk) 14:51, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)