User talk:OMGPOP1234567

April 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Norah Jones, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Norah Jones was changed by OMGPOP1234567 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.940899 on 2012-04-25T02:37:46+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:37, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Norah Jones. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The reverted edit can be found [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=489095384 here]. Widefox (talk) 02:40, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Norah Jones, you may be blocked from editing. The reverted edit can be found [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=489095561 here]. Widefox (talk) 02:40, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Norah Jones shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Widefox (talk) 02:42, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Norah Jones, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Widefox (talk) 02:42, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Lady of  Shalott  02:57, 25 April 2012 (UTC)