User talk:ONETAPSEO

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jackery (June 21)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jackery and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Jackery Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Curb_Safe_Charmer&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Jackery reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 16:35, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

June 2023
Hello ONETAPSEO. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Jackery, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:ONETAPSEO. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 16:36, 21 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Hello there, thanks a lot for reminding to add the required disclosure. I've added the disclosure to my user page and sorry for the inconvenience.
 * I'm glad to read more terms of use and obey all the rules here. Apart from brand name editting, i'd also like to make contribution to natural digital marketing Terms without any profit.
 * Thank you again! ONETAPSEO (talk) 04:46, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

 Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of username and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text  at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must: Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text  at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:27, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.


 * Hello there, I've put the Name Change request and listed the reasons and declared my respect to Wikipedia below. Please help me with name change and unblock. ONETAPSEO (talk) 03:15, 25 June 2023 (UTC)


 * I've read carefully COI and now I understand why my account is blocked.
 * I request to edit topic: Washington Christian Academy. Fix spells, tones etc. in order to improve my editting skill and make contribution to Wiki. ONETAPSEO (talk) 10:22, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
 * You will need to make a new unblock request for someone else to review. Please do this via opening the edit window, not the reply function. 331dot (talk) 11:30, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
 * My sincerely thanks! ONETAPSEO (talk) 11:31, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Jackery


A tag has been placed on Draft:Jackery, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 19:40, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

I will tell you why I have nominated this article for deletion. Your sources are almost all unreliable; some of them have been discussed at length and the consensus is that they are unacceptable.
 * 1) Forbes contributors - WP:FORBESCON; little editorial oversight, treated as a self-published source
 * 2) Crunchbase - WP:CRUNCHBASE; deprecated source, significant portion of content is user-generated
 * 3) Outdoor Warehouse - WP:VENDOR site, has a commercial interest
 * 4) The-Digital-Picture - Discloses affiliate marketing links, so same as the last one

Techcrunch source is written by a staff writer, so that seems acceptable. But one source is hardly enough to establish this as a notable company and worthy of inclusion. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 19:52, 23 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Thanks very much for giving me this very detailed instruction and reply. It's very helpful for newbie like me. I'll read carefully Wikipedia rules and Creation Guide before next editting. For the moment I'll just start learning from the beginning. ONETAPSEO (talk) 08:23, 24 June 2023 (UTC)