User talk:ONUnicorn/archived talk 6

???
How did you get the annoying pastel box? Could you put the template on my discussion page?

Wiki zilla ( Signme! )Talk 20:07, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Charun
Yes, I realize the sources I am removing had previously sparked an edit war. I saw it listed on a page detailing controversies asking for outside input. I am that outside input. It comes down to one person who thinks he WP:OWNs the page continuously putting bad sources in claiming things that are simply unencyclopedic because the person who claimed them is no more knowledgeable about the topic than having compiled a long list of books they didn;t quite understand into a wide, general knowledge book that the readers of do not know the difference. Wikipedia deserves better, and this is how things are supposed to be settled -- more than one person gets together and makes a decision and overrules one aggressive but incorrect editor. The changes will stay, and if that means i have to keep undoing what the one editor who has had this conflict with multiple people wants, then that's Wikipedia works. 216.165.158.7 16:21, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Your expertise would be welcome
Howdy! I know you're a busy bee, and I hope life is treating you well. Remember about 6 months ago, Mom and Dad? Well, i've been very slowly plugging away at it, and I think I've dealt with most of the duplication issues we had discussed back then. Would you mind taking another look when you get a shot? Thanks! --badlydrawnjeff talk 03:02, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Rock Springs Massacre
Hello there. Since you have commented on or assisted with editing Rock Springs Massacre in the past, I thought I would notify you that the article reached Good article status recently, (if you didn't already know that). Since then I have undertaken a significant expansion/overhaul/source verification mission which has resulted in a new version of the article. Soon, I hope to take it to Featured Article candidates. What it needs now is some outside input and copy editing. Anything you can offer in the area would be helpful. You may want to start by taking a look at the talk page first, I have been updating my progress on the article there regularly. Thanks ahead of time for your help. IvoShandor 09:32, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Ambiguous link
Thank you for your recent edit to Domestic drama. Your edit included one or more links to the page Realism, which is a disambiguation page. This type of page is intended to direct users to more specific topics. Ordinarily we try to avoid creating links to disambiguation pages, since it is preferable to link directly to the specific topic relevant to the context. You can help Wikipedia by revising the links you added to Domestic drama to refer directly to the most relevant topic. (This message was generated by an automatic process; if you believe it to be in error, please accept our apologies and report the error to help us improve this feature.) --Russ (talk) 20:54, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Unreferenced articles
User boxes are popular and if you know how to make one, by all means please do so. Do you think the project has enough depth to begin or is there still something missing? I am thinking it looks ready for prime time, start advertising it and get to work. Jeepday (talk) 00:31, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Unblock
I seem to be running into odd autoblocks all of a sudden. I made some edits, then suddenly got the first one - then a second, different one.

A request, if you have the time/energy/inclination...
...because you've been so helpful in the past for me, I've been working on Robert Benchley and I think it's closing in on featured level. If you could take a look at it for fixes and stuff, I'd really appreciate it. I know you've been busy, so no problem if you can't, but I can always use some input. Thanks. --badlydrawnjeff talk 15:40, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Damn, you're good. Again.  Thanks so far - BTW, "Republicrat" was his word, I was somewhat surprised to see it, too. --badlydrawnjeff talk 00:13, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I thought "Republicrat" might have been original to the text. :)  An interesting article, btw.  ~  ONUnicorn (Talk problem solving 19:33, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 * By the way, the two new images make an excellent addition to the article. ~  ONUnicorn (Talk problem solving 19:38, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I'm glad I ended up grabbing that book this week. I was pleasantly surprised to find them, and they're decent quality, too, so that helps.  --badlydrawnjeff talk 19:39, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Reliable sources/Noticeboard
Is running, we have our first requests for comment :) --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 01:38, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Request for Copyediting
Hello there, I found your name listed at WP:1FAPQ as a willing copyeditor, and I wonder if you'd be willing to provide your services for the Clan Fraser article. I need that little something to boost it to FA-status. I'd apreciate it to no end; the article's been in the same state for quite awhile now. Canæn 03:28, 31 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Following up: I noticed you hadn't made any further edits to the Clan Fraser article in a couple of days, and wonder if you're done? I'm very new to the copyediting process (ie, never done it, never had it done before), so I'm not sure if there's anything left to do but put the article up for nomination. I've considered it ready for awhile now, so I wonder what your opinion is? Thank you, [[Image:Icons-flag-scotland.png]] Canæn [[Image:Icons-flag-scotland.png]] 07:01, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

karmichael Hunt
Could you copyedit Karmichael Hunt

It would be much appreciated.

Special Windler  04:53, 16 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks for copyediting the page (which you are doing now), I will take your comments (inline) when you have finished the copyedit. If you could tell me you have finsihed, it would also be much appreciated. Thanks.  SpecialWindler   talk  03:10, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Verifiability#Age of unreferenced
I made a post to Wikipedia talk:Verifiability that you might be interested in. Jeepday (talk) 03:29, 10 July 2007 (UTC)