User talk:ONUnicorn/archived talk 7

Invitation to join WikiProject United States
Hello. This is my talk page. Feel free to leave me a message. To start a new topic please click the + sign up at the top in between "edit this page" and "history. I will probably respond on your talk page, but I might copy my response here if I'm not lazy.  I archive when I feel like it. ~ ONUnicorn (Talk / Contribs)

Thanks
Thanks for answering my questions on Esperanza. Were you a member? Most of the stuff I had already figured out, but it was nice to get the opinion of someone who was there. Thank you!! 71.131.27.16 05:01, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Hey, I didn't log in when I posted that one. Sorry about it!!   - ђαίгснгм    таιќ   17:09, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism
No problem, I'll keep an eye on your page for anything else that comes up. Stay well. GlassCobra 07:56, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Redirect of AUJS SWINBURNE
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on AUJS SWINBURNE, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because AUJS SWINBURNE is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1). To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting AUJS SWINBURNE, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 07:30, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:9Lives.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:9Lives.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:35, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Toys
Sorry to be unclear. I was wanting a named charity, yes, as in the UK where I am from I am fairly sure some charities do reject 2nd hand toys..Andycjp (talk) 03:12, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Carlo Orelli
Out of curiosity, I'm wondering if you still think that Carlo Orelli should be deleted. =D Cheers, CP 02:36, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Ah, I misread! Thanks. I just checked "what links here" and was a bit surprised, sorry about that. Cheers, CP 00:38, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:McGinty with kitten.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:McGinty with kitten.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:49, 2 January 2008 (UTC) Fixed ~  ONUnicorn (Talk problem solving 04:07, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Rollback
Hello ONUnicorn, I have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, you can be trusted to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see New admin school/Rollback and Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck. Acalamari 23:10, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Well, thanks. As little as I've been active the last few months, I was not expecting this.  Thank you.  :)  It's in good hands.
 * You're welcome! I'm sure you'll make good use of it. Acalamari 21:57, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Angie's List Logo.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Angie's List Logo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:11, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Fixed, but someone beat me to it.

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Angie's List Logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Angie's List Logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:12, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
 * fixed.

Speedy deletion of Purse party
A tag has been placed on Purse party, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dust Filter (talk) 19:50, 26 February 2008 (UTC) Thanks to whoever reverted it... 68.57.252.166 (talk) 04:45, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

399 to go
We are almost done Category:Articles lacking sources from June 2006 is down to less the 400 articles to find references for. I would like to thank you for listing yourself as a volunteer at Unreferenced articles and would like to take this opportunity to invite you to visit the project again and work on getting the last few articles referenced. We started with 5,572 and we are in the home stretch, please come and try to do a couple a day and we can finish it up in no time. Jeepday (talk) 02:14, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

New Focus at Unreferenced articles
The huge set of unreferenced articles from June of 2006 is finally completed. Thank you for your contributions. The new focus at Unreferenced articles is Category:Articles lacking sources from July 2006 which as of May 28 is only 1,322 articles and should go much quicker. Thank you to everyone who has contributed and listed themselves as a volunteer. Jeepday (talk) 11:55, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Mille Bornes cards?
Waaay back on February 14, 2007, you tagged all the card images at Mille Bornes with. The card images were original designs by User:John Reid, who released them under the GNU FDL. They were not part of any published Mille Bornes deck. If you have no objections, I'm going to remove the non-free card template. LordRM (talk) 17:11, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
 * If you're talking about Image:Card-mille-1975b-roll.png, for example, when it was uploaded it was uploaded as, "Roll card from the 1975 bilingual edition of Mille Bornes. ".  It looks more like a scan of the card than an original drawing to me, especially since it looks exactly like the cards I've played with.  Therefore I would object to that.


 * On the other hand, if you're talking about the ones like http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:MB-roll.svg, for example, I don't remember tagging them, specifically. If I did tag them I'm not quite sure what I was thinking - probably just trying to categorize the images as card images.  At any rate, you've moved them to commons now so they should be fine.


 * Perhaps I thought they could be considered derivative works? That's a distinct possibility, and one you should probably check out with someone who is real clear on what is and isn't considered a derivative work. ~  ONUnicorn (Talk problem solving 22:53, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

Suggestion
I put a suggestion in your sandbox. J IM ptalk·cont 07:58, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Hey, thanks! That's much nicer.  (Now I just need to remember what article that was for...) ;) ~  ONUnicorn (Talk problem solving 22:02, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Image:Trisha Yearwood cropped.JPG listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Trisha Yearwood cropped.JPG, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 14:38, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Image:Trisha Yearwood cropped.JPG
Hey, sorry for misattributing the cleaned up version of it. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 04:11, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
 * That's ok. ~  ONUnicorn (Talk problem solving 20:28, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Edufire situation
Hi ONUnicorn, you may not be aware but there seems to have been a problem lately with the edufire,com being added as a spam link. I say this because the edufire link apparently has a global block on it and can't be added to any article. Regards, TallMagic (talk) 05:57, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I know that the Edufire people were paying people to spam their external link on various Wikipedia pages. I thought this may have been a misinterpretation of the ophan article tag on the Edufire article, which is why I went around adding it to see-alsos (and removing the external link wherever I found it), so that I could de-orphan the article. ~  ONUnicorn (Talk problem solving 16:47, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Cold Fire (product)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Cold Fire (product), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. --Sophitessa (talk) 04:07, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

Re Template:Infobox mountain
You are using Infobox mountain on your sub page User:ONUnicorn/Browning Hill Research. Your infobox used deprecated parameter names. In the near future the template is to be updated and the old parameter names will no longer work. I updated the template for you. I hope that was OK. – droll  &#91;chat&#93;  20:22, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:ShakespeareFan00/Food and Drink Notability Guidelines
User:ShakespeareFan00/Food and Drink Notability Guidelines, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:ShakespeareFan00/Food and Drink Notability Guidelines and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User:ShakespeareFan00/Food and Drink Notability Guidelines during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:52, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:McGinty with kitten.gif
 Thanks for uploading File:McGinty with kitten.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 17:31, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

The Olive Branch: A Dispute Resolution Newsletter (Issue #1)
Welcome to the first edition of The Olive Branch. This will be a place to semi-regularly update editors active in dispute resolution (DR) about some of the most important issues, advances, and challenges in the area. You were delivered this update because you are active in DR, but if you would prefer not to receive any future mailing, just add your name to this page. In this issue: Read the entire first edition of The Olive Branch -->
 * Background: A brief overview of the DR ecosystem.
 * Research: The most recent DR data
 * Survey results: Highlights from Steven Zhang's April 2012 survey
 * Activity analysis: Where DR happened, broken down by the top DR forums
 * DR Noticeboard comparison: How the newest DR forum has progressed between May and August
 * Discussion update: Checking up on the Wikiquette Assistance close debate
 * Proposal: It's time to close the Geopolitical, ethnic, and religious conflicts noticeboard. Agree or disagree?

--The Olive Branch 19:20, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Mail
You've got email. — TransporterMan  ( TALK ) 16:35, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

PC Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:
 * Reviewing, the guideline on reviewing
 * Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
 * Protection policy, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:01, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks. ~  ONUnicorn (Talk problem solving 22:08, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rehmanabad, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mongla. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 15 January 2015 (UTC)