User talk:OO7-AAA

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Ray Talk 00:03, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Edits to Mitt Romney article
Your recent editing history at Mitt Romney shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly.

You do not have consensus for the changes you want to make - explaining them is not enough, you need other editors to agree with the changes. Please discuss on Talk Tvoz / talk 00:36, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

March 2015
Hello, I'm Dwpaul. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Shooting of Michael Brown, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''See Common knowledge for a discussion of common knowledge. This isn't.''  Dwpaul   Talk   22:57, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Shooting of Michael Brown
I reverted your edits to Shooting of Michael Brown. Please review Common knowledge before adding material that you think is common knowledge – especially when that material involves living people. Also you marked your main edit, so to speak, as minor. Please review Help:Minor edit. Politrukki (talk) 14:16, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

June 2017
Hello, I'm Grand'mere Eugene. I wanted to let you know that some of your recent contributions have been reverted or removed because they could seem to be defamatory or libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Grand&#39;mere Eugene (talk) 19:21, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Note about Forbes contributor blogs
Hi - a quick note about "Contributor" blogs on Forbes.com: these are typically not viewed as reliable sources for statements of fact in Wikipedia's own voice. Forbes "contributors" are not Forbes staff (i.e., professional journalists or editors), but suppliers of user-generated content, and Forbes doesn't have a sufficient degree of editorial control, fact-checking, etc. over them. See Poynter Institute: Forbes has over 1,000 such "contributors" and "There is no traditional editing of contributors' copy, at least not prior to publishing" (link). So we do not use them for statements of fact. (They may sometimes be useful for opinion, subject to other policies like WP:WEIGHT, relevance, attribution, etc.)

--Neutralitytalk 22:40, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Notice regarding edits relating to living or recently deceased people
Neutralitytalk 22:41, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
 * This is merely a standard notification to people who edit in the topic area - as it says, it does not imply wrongdoing. Neutralitytalk 22:41, 2 June 2017 (UTC)