User talk:OUatt

Please avoid inserting things that are not neutral point of view into Wikipedia like you did for the University of Oklahoma article. Thanks. -- Ash Lux ( talk 15:50, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

Hello, I reverted your recent edit to University of Oklahoma because it deleted a sizable chunk of existing, referenced material, and because it introduces your POV to the article. If you want to introduce valid criticism from notable, referenced, sources, that is OK - but you can't say thinks like: I could go on but I hope you get the idea. Johntex\talk 15:53, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
 * "It was considered by most that" - unsourced weasel words
 * "Lest we forget" - unencyclopedic and self referencing
 * "Boren believes that we are responsible enough to make large amounts of money to donate to the university, but not responsible enough to have a beer or cocktail during a football game." - unsourced weasel words, unencyclopedic, POV, etc.
 * "Punishing everyone for the actions of a few is Borens way." - unsourced, POV, personal attack...