User talk:OWERRRRRRR

February 2024
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Hawker Hurricane, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. GrayStorm(Talk&#124;Contributions) 17:55, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hawker Hurricane. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:57, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Hawker Hurricane was changed by OWERRRRRRR (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952283 on 2024-02-13T17:57:19+00:00


 * Nuvola apps important.svg Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. &#39;&#39;Flux55&#39;&#39; (talk) 17:59, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at North American B-25 Mitchell, you may be blocked from editing. – 64andtim  ( talk ) 18:05, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Humvee, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. &#45;Fnlayson (talk) 16:42, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

March 2024
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Humvee have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:34, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Humvee was changed by OWERRRRRRR (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.961164 on 2024-03-03T04:34:02+00:00

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. — k6ka  🍁 ( Talk ·  Contributions ) 04:45, 3 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia stands as a beacon of knowledge, a testament to the collaborative spirit of humanity's quest for information. Yet, behind its vast repository of articles lies a community of contributors, each with their own voice and perspective. Unfortunately, I find myself silenced within this community, blocked from contributing, despite my earnest desire to participate constructively. In this essay, I aim to articulate why my block should be reconsidered, emphasizing my commitment to Wikipedia's principles and my potential to contribute positively to its mission.
 * Acknowledgment of Past Mistakes: It's essential to start by acknowledging any past transgressions. If my actions have violated Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, I accept responsibility and express sincere remorse. However, I firmly believe in the power of redemption and growth. My past should not define my future contributions.
 * Commitment to Improvement: Every setback presents an opportunity for growth. During my time away from Wikipedia, I've reflected on my actions and invested effort into understanding and adhering to its policies more diligently. I've familiarized myself with best practices for editing, ensuring that my future contributions align with Wikipedia's standards of accuracy and neutrality.
 * Despite my block, my desire to contribute meaningfully to Wikipedia remains unwavering. I've always approached editing with the intention of enhancing articles, correcting inaccuracies, and expanding knowledge in areas where I possess expertise. My contributions have aimed to enrich the collective understanding of diverse topics, fostering a culture of learning and curiosity.
 * Respect for Community Guidelines: Respect for Wikipedia's community guidelines is paramount to maintaining the integrity of its content. I pledge to uphold these guidelines with utmost diligence, ensuring that my contributions adhere to principles of verifiability, neutrality, and civility. By fostering a culture of mutual respect and collaboration, I seek to cultivate a positive environment for knowledge-sharing within the Wikipedia community.
 * The block has not only restricted my ability to contribute but has also deprived the Wikipedia community of potential insights and perspectives that I could offer. As a passionate advocate for knowledge dissemination, I'm keenly aware of the significance of my contributions and the impact they can have on enriching Wikipedia's content.
 * Willingness to Collaborate: Collaboration lies at the heart of Wikipedia's success. I'm eager to engage with fellow editors, administrators, and members of the Wikipedia community in constructive dialogue. By fostering open communication and collaboration, we can collectively strive towards the shared goal of creating a comprehensive and reliable source of information.
 * Demonstrated Growth and Change: Time away from Wikipedia has provided me with an opportunity for introspection and personal growth. I've acquired new skills, expanded my knowledge base, and gained a deeper appreciation for the importance of responsible editing. My reinstatement would signify not only a second chance but also a testament to my continued growth and dedication to Wikipedia's mission.
 * In conclusion, I humbly appeal for my reinstatement within the Wikipedia community, emphasizing my acknowledgment of past mistakes, commitment to improvement, and unwavering dedication to Wikipedia's principles. As a passionate advocate for knowledge dissemination, I believe that my contributions have the potential to enrich Wikipedia's content and foster a culture of learning and collaboration within its community. I respectfully request that my block be reconsidered, allowing me the opportunity to once again contribute meaningfully to this invaluable platform. OWERRRRRRR (talk) 02:47, 14 May 2024 (UTC)