User talk:Oakraven81

Geno Auriemma
Why are you removing the awards table from it? It's not like you're changing the content, you're just putting it in a worse format. Silver seren C 20:09, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

I created the table one month ago to summarize the awards, but at the end it's no so readable as I hoped. I'm trying to use a more compact and clear format.User:Oakraven81

March 2016
Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! 🍀 Corkythe hornetfan  🍀 17:47, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Connecticut Huskies women's basketball
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Connecticut Huskies women's basketball you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 17:20, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Connecticut Huskies women's basketball
The article Connecticut Huskies women's basketball you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Connecticut Huskies women's basketball for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 17:40, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Connecticut Huskies women's basketball
The article Connecticut Huskies women's basketball you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Connecticut Huskies women's basketball for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 22:01, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

List of college women's basketball coaches with 600 wins
Thanks for doing the general updates to this page.

I see someone misread something and changed Hatchell's wins from 988 to 987, I reverted that change. However, I believe the loss number is 369 not 368. Let's make sure we agree.-- S Philbrick (Talk)  01:36, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

--> Hello Sphilbrick, thank you for your dedication to college basketball articles. I know there is a dispute about Hatchell's record because of some games supension, but as you said in the article talk it's better to use NCCA website as the only reliable source for these statistics (http://web1.ncaa.org/stats/StatsSrv/careersearch). Today it states 988 wins and 368 losses, so I would stick with that. Anyway updating the record of a single coach is too much of an effort, I'll keep on with periodic general updates. Moreover, I'm thinking about the best way to introduce NCAA/NAIA divisions in the table with a color scheme that is both readable and complete. I believe it's a very valuable information, but I don't want the table to become a rainbow of colours. I'll be back with some proposal ASAP. .--Oakraven81 10 February 2017


 * Please note that there may be more than one issue. There is a question about the year she took off for health reasons. Someone removed those, I restored them and explained on the talk page.


 * More recently, there is an unexplained issue about one game. Someone changed the results by a single win, which I reverted. Someone else changed it again, although self-reverted. I have a guess, although not certain. The article about the coach Sylvia Hatchell was not currrent but the results on that page through last year end were in error, as a single win was missing from 1993-94. I fixed that yesterday. One possibility is that someone assumed the results through last year end were correct, added the 13 wins this year to get 987, and tried to change it to 987.
 * However, when I updated that page, I see that the cumulative losses did not match the number you used, so I also made that change and contacted you to make sure we agree.


 * I do agree that the page should not be updated every day, and I'm fine with updating it on occasion, and insisting that no editor make a change to a single coach, unless they are willing to do all coaches, and update the as of date. Obviously, we have have to update when Hatchell gets very close to 1000.


 * Regarding color, please note that the page used to be a seas of colors, partly to denote division. I made a change in 2015, and hope any plan you have will be done as a draft so we can reach a consensus, as a return to the old scheme would be a step backward, in my opinion.-- S Philbrick (Talk)  12:54, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)