User talk:Oakshade/Archive 6

Nomination of Paul Robinett for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paul Robinett is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Paul Robinett& until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mjbmr (talk) 03:29, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Mjbmr
The moment I saw that AfD comment, I knew it was going to be fun. At least this time there's a relatively strong admission of WP:OTHERSTUFF in play, as well as a bit of an ownership thing going on, so we do at least know for sure what the user's actions are based on. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 02:45, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Ranch poster.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:The Ranch poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:11, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

September 2017 at Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 21:19, 28 August 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Speedy deletion nomination of Amélie Veille


Hello. This page has been tagged for speedy deletion under the a7 criteria.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Best, --&thinsp;&mdash; Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)&thinsp; 16:14, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Being a singer-songwriter with four albums is an indication of notability. The speedy tag in less than a minute of article creation was inappropriate. --Oakshade (talk) 20:19, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Daphne Scoccia


The article Daphne Scoccia has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Pam D  06:20, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Women in Red October editathon invitation
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:54, 25 September 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging

November editathons from Women in Red: Join us!
-Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:19, 21 October 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Nomination of Jessie Li for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jessie Li is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jessie Li until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –Ammarpad (talk) 19:08, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

New Year's resolution: Write more articles for Women in Red!
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:13, 27 December 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Nomination of Joshua Claybourn for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joshua Claybourn is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Joshua Claybourn (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Notifying you about the discussion, since you have made significant contributions to articles related to this subject. --IndyNotes (talk) 03:51, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Food
Hello! After the successful pilot program by Wikimedia India in 2015, Wiki Loves Food (WLF) is happening again in 2018 and this year, it's  going International. To make this event a grand success, your direction is key. Please sign up here as a volunteer to bring all the world's food to Wikimedia. Danidamiobi (talk) 21:56, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Women in Red June Editathons
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:15, 29 May 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Nomination of Thread (film) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thread (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Thread (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BOVINEBOY 2008 17:02, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Theatrical poster for Thread (film).jpg
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:10, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve Dark Tourist (television series)
Hi, I'm Boleyn. Oakshade, thanks for creating Dark Tourist (television series)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This has no references and no indication of why it is notable. Please add references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 06:25, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Yuliya Aug


A tag has been placed on Yuliya Aug requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Firstclass306 (talk) 20:27, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Stu Osborn Show for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stu Osborn Show is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Stu Osborn Show& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 07:51, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Get ready for November with Women in Red!
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:40, 14 October 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Ways to improve Joana Bárcia
Hello, Oakshade,

Welcome to Wikipedia and thanks for creating Joana Bárcia! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 09:24, 29 December 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Allie Goertz


A tag has been placed on Allie Goertz requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Z359q (talk) 07:56, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Allie Goertz for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Allie Goertz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Allie Goertz until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Z359q (talk) 10:43, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

January 2019
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Cameron Crowe. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 20:57, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
 * DonIago, I've been editing on WP since 2006 so the "Welcome to Wikipedia" tag is factually incorrect, as were the tags that were placed on the article in question. It is a straight forward biography with many sources and the "Peacock" tag didn't match the article content.  The tags, which were placed there five years ago, were basically this:


 * I advise placing a "Citations needed" mark on the specific content you feel is controversial. Oakshade (talk) 22:47, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
 * If the issues have been addressed, that's cool and I have no issues with the removal, but that's not the reason you cited in your edit summary. DonIago (talk) 00:04, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

You've got mail!
PS this page is NOT watched so please ping me if you had replied or just reply to the email. Didn't want to post the topic publically.

Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 23:47, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

WP:POINT article creation
Sonasan railway station was created by User:Rhadow as a WP:POINT article as evident by his comments at my talk page. Although I do support his view point on stations needing to pass WP:GNG, I can't support such WP:POINT articles. Pinging User:Mjroots who previously deleted that article. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 13:09, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

There is a discussion of this incident at Wikipedia_talk:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion if you wanna chime in. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 17:26, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
 * I’m getting suspicious of the consistent tandomness of Rhadow’s and The Banner’s edits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oakshade (talk • contribs)
 * To avoid fragmentation, continue commenting at Wikipedia_talk:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion? --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 19:43, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Edit: he commented "it's bait" (diff) and then sneakily removed that comment (diff).

And the Banner was canvassed. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:The_Banner&oldid=881624861#Notability --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 19:53, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Wikidata
Hello Oakshade, please see Wikidata --Glorious Engine (talk) 00:27, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
 * What specifically would you like me to look at?Oakshade (talk) 03:50, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Boston Surface Railroad
Template:Boston Surface Railroad has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.  Zack mann  (Talk to me/What I been doing) 00:20, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

April 2019
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:01, 25 March 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

(Please excuse this post if it is a duplicate!)

May you join this month's editathons from WiR!
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:17, 27 April 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Réka Tenki
Ha thanks, must of pressed the wrong language code on the expand language for Réka Tenki and somehow I got another language-didn't even notice that till you changed it! Wgolf (talk) 03:38, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Hah, no prob. Oakshade (talk) 05:28, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

June events with WIR
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:42, 22 May 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

July events from Women in Red!
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:41, 25 June 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Your draft article, Draft:Joana Bárcia


Hello, Oakshade. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Joana Bárcia".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 12:24, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Northampton
Just FYI: the reason that I removed several paragraphs from Northampton and several other stations was because they were substantially outdated, and not really related. Any history of the various service proposals on the Connecticut River Line really belongs on that article; I replaced that with the sentence about the service that was actually implemented. (I was the one who originally wrote the older paragraphs as well.) Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:04, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

October Events from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:36, 23 September 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Speedy deletion nomination of Lera Loeb


A tag has been placed on Lera Loeb requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Toddst1 (talk) 18:59, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

Re: Speedy deletion of Lera Loeb by TomStar81 less than 4 hours after notice & Deletion review for Lera Loeb
First off, my apologies for the extremely long delay between your message and my reply. I work a twelve hour night shift on a week on week off basis and it leaves little time for other activities, so Wikipedia and Wiki-related issues usually sit on the back burner during my work week. That being said, you've got questions and no editor or contributor for that matter likes a delay between the question and the reply. For that you have my apologies.

First of all, a correction: I did not tag the article for speedy deletion, the tagger was. I deleted the article, which is not the same thing. Take care that you assign the right action to the right editor, there can be ramifications for false claims in situations such as this.

Second, you article had exactly zero claim of significance. The external link section all goes to sites that are usually frowned on here, and two citations to a magazine article a UK internet article do not establish reliable independent third party coverage for a biographical article's sources to the standards set forth by Wikipedia. A check of the google search included in the csd template for admins also fails to ride to your rescue here: most celebrates judged significant or notable enough to be on Wikipedia have millions of results, while your girl has just under 700,000. My city has a greater population than the search results, and when you account for mirrors, repeat coverage, and social media that has little if any place in or on a Wikipedia article that number inevitably shrinks further. Compounding the problem is that she's not in any major movie production, the article states only a "short film" but in a broad sense anything can be considered a "short film" - mom's camcorder capture of my piano recital could be considered a short film, as could any of the instructional videos for audio read thorough of a Wikipedia article. None of that remotely establishes significance, let alone notability as you have claimed.

As for mail order brides, that sounds like a nice solid foundation for an article to be built on, but she is not the first mail order bride, nor will she be the last, and while it does make her story unique, it fails to establish significance or notability because its not been a major factor in her life's story or life's work to date. Contrast that with Greta Thunberg, for example, whose only claim to significance is whining loudly in public, but unlike Lera she's considered an international hero for her ability to waste time by preaching to ignorant masses who either legitimately care about her BS or pretend to in order to elevate her status. The sole difference between the two of girls is a cruel third party that interprets notability and significance by adding context, and from that you reach the threshold for inclusion here.

You are, of course, free to protest, however a deletion review is unlikely to be a productive venue for your petition for redress of grievances because victory at deletion review will defeat you: when the article makes it to afd it'll be deleted, after which your CSD-A& tag will be switched out for the far more potent CSD-G4 tag. G4 speedy deletion criteria prohibits articles deleted via afd discussion from returning at or anywhere near their form at the time they were axed, so you'd end up winning the battle and losing the war. Food for thought. TomStar81 (Talk) 06:37, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
 * TomStar81, firstly apologies for the confusion over who was the tagger and deleter.  Apologies were made in the DRV too.


 * More importantly your speedy deletion of this article on the grounds of A7 was inappropriate and hence it was reversed. Both the verbiage of “She was revealed to be a mail order bride” and the very in-depth Glamour piece about this topic which was linked in the article at the time of your deletion demonstrated an arguable case for passing our notability standards. As you’re an administrator you should’ve already known that A7 is a much lower standard than notability and any evidence of notability negates A7.  This was repeatedly expressed to you by multiple other administrators and editors in the DRV.


 * You were, of course, free to protest at the deletion review, however the deletion review overturned your deletion and after a full-term AfD the article was unanimously kept in the same form as when you speedy deleted it, causing you, in your word, defeat. Next time you contemplate using your current administrative powers to delete an article that has GNG-passing coverage in it under the grounds of the lower standard of A7, you should at most send it to AfD and therefore you can prevent such unnecessary discussion, or in your words "a complete waste of time and creation of drama" and "goat breeding festival," by the community and a "defeat" on your part in the future.  Food for thought.  Oakshade (talk) 23:34, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Lera Loeb for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lera Loeb is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Lera Loeb until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SportingFlyer  T · C  10:57, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

WP:ANI
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. --TomStar81 (Talk) 14:15, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Well thats that then. Congratulations on your success this/these. In accordance with the ten pledges, I recognize you as the winner of the contest, and having been deprived both my voice and and my !vote do resolve to resign myself from the case. TomStar81 (Talk) 16:37, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
 * (Courtesy removal of response. Content preserved in history.Oakshade (talk) 03:46, 9 December 2019 (UTC))

December events with WIR
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:44, 25 November 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Happy Holidays text.png


Oakshade, Have a great 2020 and thanks for your continued contributions to Wikipedia.

– 2020 is a leap year   – news article. – Background color is Classic Blue (#0F4C81), Pantone's 2020 Color of the year Send New Year cheer by adding     to user talk pages.

–  North America1000 22:45, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

The article, Pinelopi Tsilika may not meet Wikipedia's general notability guideline but if you strongly believe that the subject is notable for a Wikipedia article then add independent verifiable sources. Cryforjustice (talk) 06:44, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

February with Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 19:31, 28 January 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Speedy deletion nomination of List of people with coronavirus disease 2019


A tag has been placed on List of people with coronavirus disease 2019 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

"the page has been deleted and is currently pending DRV; it does not need to be recreated with a notice, unless an adminstrator restores its history and blanks it, which is not the case here."

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. MrClog (talk) 16:00, 19 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Just to follow up on the above, only administrators should add Temporarily undeleted because only they have the ability to undelete pages. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 18:42, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

/* Teakettle
Please see discussion at Talk:Teakettle Junction, CaliforniaDjflem (talk) 20:05, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

Deletion review for Theresa Greenfield
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Theresa Greenfield. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. KingForPA (talk) 20:48, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

September Women in Red edithons
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:53, 29 August 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Canopy express?
Talk:Canopy express --Guy Macon (talk) 17:52, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

October editathons from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:11, 21 September 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

November edith-a-thons from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:49, 28 October 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

December with Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:41, 26 November 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

A New Year With Women in Red!
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 03:02, 29 December 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

April editathons from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:17, 22 March 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Proposed deletion of Pinelopi Tsilika


The article Pinelopi Tsilika has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Entirely unsourced. Only sources found about this actress are mere passing mentions. Fails WP:NACTOR."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jalen Folf  (talk)  16:27, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Pinelopi Tsilika for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pinelopi Tsilika is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Pinelopi Tsilika until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jalen Folf  (talk)  16:45, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sadžida Šetić


The article Sadžida Šetić has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one.  scope_creep Talk  20:24, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Michalina Łabacz


The article Michalina Łabacz has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one.  scope_creep Talk  20:25, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Adelfa Calvo


The article Adelfa Calvo has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one.  scope_creep Talk  20:26, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Agnieszka Suchora


The article Agnieszka Suchora has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one.  scope_creep Talk  20:26, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Agnieszka Mandat


The article Agnieszka Mandat has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one.  scope_creep Talk  20:27, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

May 2021 at Women in Red
--Rosiestep (talk) 21:37, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

Elizium23 (talk) 04:34, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

August Editathons with Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:27, 23 July 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging