User talk:Obaidz96/Archive 1

Please stop
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- FayssalF  - Wiki me up®  01:33, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Adding images
There are procedures that must be followed to add an image. The image doesn't just magically appear if you insert the name and website that contains it. The image must be uploaded to Wikipedia first. Be careful not to violate the creator's copyright. Wikipedia has strict rules about copyright violation. Ward3001 22:53, 2 September 2007 (UTC)


 * The image "070831 chupacabra vmed 7p widec.jpg‎" is copyrighted. Do not add it to an article. That is considered vandalism and can result in your being blocked from editing. Ward3001 22:58, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Image:070831 chupacabra vmed 7p widec.jpg‎
An image that you uploaded, Image:070831 chupacabra vmed 7p widec.jpg‎, has been listed at Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ward3001 23:17, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:070831 chupacabra vmed 7p widec.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:070831 chupacabra vmed 7p widec.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 13:48, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

December 2007
Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information, and has been reverted or removed. All information in the encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable published source. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. I appreciate your edits, but students at Texas A&M call the school "t.u." In this context and given that this is a quote, this usage is perfectly acceptable and has the consensus of the majority of editors (see the article's FA Candidacy page). Your source "I'm from Houston" is not acceptable. Your input is valuable, though. Please discuss on the talk page if you feel this is still incorrect. — BQZip01 — talk 01:02, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Krimmel Intermediate
I wouldn't just recreate the article, I would bring it to Deletion Review instead. The general consensus as I understand is that high schools are notable enough for articles, but the lower tier schools are borderline. -MBK004 19:31, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
 * The article's content was merged into Klein Independent School District and a redirect was established. As this was also done for two other intermediate schools in the district, I see no chance because of these facts, that the school will ever have its own article. Besides, any recreation would most likely be tagged for deletion via notability reasons like the original one was. I know this isn't what you were looking for, but the best course of action would be to just leave it alone. -MBK004 23:39, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

February 2008
Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. We cannot accept a copy and paste, it must be properly cited and not a straight copy. -MBK004 22:04, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Copy and paste even citing where you copied from is not acceptable nor is it permitted. Besides, the district's Acceptable Use Policy doesn't really belong there in the first place (See WP:NOT). -MBK004 23:54, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. This is especially important when dealing with biographies of living people, but applies to all Wikipedia articles. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are already familiar with Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add your reference to the article. S M S  Talk 05:22, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. ''I noticed your rationale for deleting the image of Jesus, yet this is not acceptable rationale for removing these images from the article. Please read WP:CENSOR.'' scetoaux (talk) (My contributions.) 00:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Please read WP:CENSOR scetoaux (talk) (My contributions.) 00:46, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. scetoaux (talk) (My contributions.) 00:48, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Sorry! I did all of it, and didn't read your message until later. I am Sorry, And I will bring it to the Talk page on the Jesus Article. PROMISE! --Obaidz96 (talk) 00:51, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Read and understood. scetoaux (talk) (My contributions.) 00:55, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

RFA...?
Obaidz96,

I just noticed that you have applied for adminship, but submitted a blank template. If you wish to go along with your self-nom, could you please take the time to fill out the template correctly? Cheers, Mix   It    Up   16:54, 29 February 2008 (UTC)


 * I see...Have you read the admin guidelines? I just looked through your contribs, and you have less than 500 edits, and have been involved in some sticky situation recently. Until you get a substantially larger amount of edits, and clear up whatever problems that have caused other editors to warn you repeatedly, I recommend taking down the RFA, or at least asking an existing administrator for help in the matter. Mix   It    Up   16:59, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I have to echo what has been said above. The RfA does not have a chance to succeed because of your past problems until there has been quite some time inbetween them. Hence, I would recommend reading the guidelines, working in admin-type areas, and increasing your overall edit count (very rarely are RfAs successful if the user has fewer than 3000 edits and at least 3 months on the project). Also, if your RfA was actually posted to the RfA page, it would be closed within 2 hours under WP:SNOW. Hope that you'll take this advice to heart and evolve into a great editor. -MBK004 20:23, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Ted Poe Sig.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Ted Poe Sig.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 22:34, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Hannah Montana in Concert.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Hannah Montana in Concert.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:15, 20 March 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NrDg 23:15, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Reply
I am sorry....can you delete the image right away? Before someone else gets offended, I looked at the Yahoo! (the site I got it from) News article, and turns out they don't own it. So...please delete it right away. I do not know how to.--Obaidz96 (talk) 23:24, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

March 2008
Please do not add inappropriate images to Wikipedia; it is considered to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. ''Free use images ONLY in infobox. I know you know the rules.'' NrDg 23:21, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Surviving Antarctica
A tag has been placed on Surviving Antarctica requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ninety:one 22:06, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Rollback
All of your questions can be answered by reading this. -MBK004 02:41, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Frankly, I'm inclined not to at this time because of your experience level and lack of anti-vandalism-type edits, and the issues surrounding the myriad of notices on your talk page that indicate you do not know the policies and rules of wikipedia at a level I would be comfortable with granting rollback to. If you believe otherwise, please request rollback at Requests for Rollback. Regards, -MBK004 03:05, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Just a note regarding your request at RFR, you are not following the instructions on the page. I recommend you do so, or else your request won't be taken seriously. -MBK004 03:31, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

RFA
You forgot to transclude your RfA at Requests for adminship and your request is malformed. :) BoL (Talk) 03:47, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Just place an edit to that effect on the page stating your intent. Someone will withdraw it for you. -MBK004 04:37, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

RfB
Thanks for suggesting that, but I wouldn't stand a chance there. I don't spend enough time at RfA, policy pages, and working on other bureaucrat-type things. -MBK004 04:21, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Deletion of userpage
Ryulong deleted your userpage because it contains personal information that allows you to be identified. Please note that everyone can read Wikipedia, so release of personal information if you're underaged is extremely ill-advised. &mdash;Dark talk 04:25, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Surviving Antarctica
of course, if it is notable then it should stay. the award made it so ;). in future, you might like to write the whole article out in a Sandbox, or just write it and 'preview' it before you click 'save page'. that will help with any misunderstandings. thanks! ninety:one 11:00, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Window Boy
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Window Boy, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.ipgbook.com/showbook.cfm?bookid=1933979143&amp;userid=B0C0CA8A-803F-2B7A-70E9ACBD26096896. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 23:41, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Window Boy
A tag has been placed on Window Boy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. flaminglawyerc 23:41, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Redirects to User Space from Article Space
Hi, please don't create redirects to a page in user space from a page in article space, as you did on MBK004. Doing so is not in accordance with Wikipedia policies and such articles are eligible for speedy deletion under criteria R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Redfarmer (talk) 01:12, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Just a note to let you know that I deleted that. You should seriously consider what your reasons for being here on wikipedia are and what you intend to contribute to the encyclopedia, because I don't appreciate things like that regarding the redirect to my userpage. Also, other admins may consider your pattern of behavior regarding copying bits and pieces of my userbox formatting and the creation of that redirect could be considered a form of wikistalking. I normally assume good faith, but my patience is wearing thin. -MBK004 01:42, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Re: Your Tag to Andrea White
I think that the topic is notable for Wikipedia. It is an article about a published author. read this carefully. If you tagged it for another reason, please explain


 * I've read that carefully as you suggested. I can't see anything there which makes her notable.  Which criteria do you think she satisfies? Ogranut (talk) 03:18, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

April 2008
Hi, the recent edit you made to The Suite Life of Zack & Cody recurring characters has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Al.locke (talk) 01:03, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Your question
What you're referring to is my navbar, the code for which is at User:Scetoaux/Nav. Making one for yourself requires a lot of tweaking and some understanding of the template syntax, which can get a bit dicey at times. You're free to use my code, provided of course that yours is changed to reflect your own links, and to remove the rollback icon that's also on that page. &mdash; scetoaux (T/C)  03:27, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Crystal Mystery.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Crystal Mystery.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 04:30, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Surviving Antarctica Cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Surviving Antarctica Cover.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 00:50, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Hi, the you made to Image:Surviving Antarctica Cover.jpg has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Sceptre (talk) 00:54, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Your userbox
Hi. I have moved your userbox from User Hn-N to User:Obaidz96/Userboxes/Hn-N. You have created this page incorrectly into main article space. I have requested User Hn-N to be deleted. Please see WP:Userboxes for the correct procedure on how to create a userbox. Thanks. erc talk/contribs 08:30, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I have just realized that you have multiple other incorrectly created userboxes - namely, User Hn-0, User Hn-1, User Hn-2, User Hn-3, User Hn-4, User Hn-5, and User Hn-6. I have moved or copied all of these pages back to your user space, where you will find them at User:Obaidz96/Userboxes/Hn-X where X is the number of the box. I have requested deletion for all of these templates. Feel free to create these templates in the appropriate manner. Thanks. erc talk/contribs 18:00, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi. Is it ok now? I don't want to violate any rules. -- Obaidz96 (talk • contribs • count ) 22:55, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
 * If they are on your user page, almost anything is fine. You can remove the stub tags, though, as your user boxes aren't articles so they don't need the stub tags. If you wanted to create them in template space, you have to create them in Template:User Hn-0, etc. You forgot to create the boxes in Template: namespace. Also, I am not 100% sure how the process to make userboxes work, so I would advise you to read the page and (if you want) ask someone with more experience than me. erc talk/contribs 23:00, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Jammu and Kashmir
I added a Comment on the Talk page of Jammu and Kasmir, and asked you to answer both on the talk talk page AND to copy that answer and paste it here, so I can see it with out forgetting to check back. Please copy that here, and don't forget to use the correct number of ':' (colons). -- Obaidz96 (talk • contribs • count )

RE:Vandalism of Surviving Antarctica
Please do not Vandalise articles like you did to Surviving Antarctica. If you vandalise Surviving Antarctica again, you will be reported. Your edit of "your mom is ugly" is definately not constructive to Wikipedia. It looks as if you have enough experiance to not do things like that! -- Obaidz96 (talk • contribs • count ) (talk) 22:37, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I think you are mistaken, in fact you are very mistaken. I made this edit here where i reverted the vandalism and i believe you are referring to this user here who wrote the nonsense about the mom. I didn't even notice that because i just saw the edit of 'GERARD IS THE BEST.' Thanks for picking up on it. Thanks Roadrunnerz45 (talk) 05:41, 16 April 2008 (UTC)