User talk:Obama088

Garth Brooks
Hi Obama088, I see that you have re-added information about Garth Brooks's ancestry. Because this is a Biography of a Living Person, all information in the article needs to be cited to an independent, reliable source (like a newspaper) or it can be removed immediately. Also, this information is not that relevant in Brooks's life; unless his ancestry impacted him significantly (and that would need to be documented in the article with reliable sources), then it really doesn't need to go in the article. I am going to remove the information again, as it is uncited. Please do not add it back in without a citation to a reliable source. Please also be aware of our three-revert rule; you have already added the information twice; adding it a third time after being told that it violates policy is not a good thing. Karanacs (talk) 19:00, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

November 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Garth Brooks has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Alan (talk) 23:30, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Harmonized Sales Tax
Hi,

Thanks for contributing to the HST article. Can you add the source where you got your information? thanks! --Pdelongchamp (talk) 06:28, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

40th Parliament
Please note the years of the legislation you added - the years don't coincide with the term of the 40th Parliament.  PK T (alk)  19:22, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Adding non-notable/trivial info to articles
Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Something Awful worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. OhNo itsJamie Talk 21:42, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

October 2010
Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Something Awful. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. KGasso (talk) 21:55, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

April 2011
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Michael Ignatieff. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Ckatz chat spy  00:30, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Michael Ignatieff. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  Neil N   talk to me  17:39, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

Final warning
I can see you've been warned about this explicitly several times above. Please do not add unsourced material to BLPS as you did to Bill Gates; consider this a final warning. Kuru  (talk)  23:00, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

March 2012
Please stop making disruptive edits to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Occupy Buffalo. STOP Persistently adding "Steve Norris" and disrupting the page layout. Consider using Edit summary when performing edits. Thank you.Fortunate4now (talk) 16:54, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

November 2012
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Barack Obama. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Scjessey (talk) 17:46, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. – GorillaWarfare (talk) 17:47, 7 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Note, by the way, that no such phrase as "consent of the governed" occurs in the US Constitution. —Tamfang (talk) 09:42, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

March 2013
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for you have continued to add unsourced information to articles despite a number of warnings. Your last two edits were in one sense innocuous but they still were done ignoring the warnings. What made me clear about the need to block you was this edit which called someone gay with no source whatsover, a clear breach of WP:BLP.. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Dougweller (talk) 08:25, 3 March 2013 (UTC)