User talk:Obamanator1793

The Teahouse Turns One!
It's been an exciting year for the Teahouse and you were a part of it. Thanks so much for visiting, asking questions, sharing answers, being friendly and helpful, and just keeping Teahouse an awesome place. You can read more about the impact we're having and the reflections of other guests and hosts like you. Please come by the Teahouse to celebrate with us, and enjoy this sparkly cupcake badge as our way of saying thank you. And, Happy Birthday!


 * --Ocaasi and the rest of the Teahouse Team 22:24, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Oct 2020
You are not a new user so this is a warning, do not mark edits that alter the tone (as you did at Gab (social network)) as minor.Slatersteven (talk) 15:42, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

DS Alert

 * --Jorm (talk) 15:51, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

I suggest you stop now.Slatersteven (talk) 15:53, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Read wp:minor do it again and I report you.Slatersteven (talk) 15:57, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

October 2020
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Gab (social network), did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jorm (talk) 15:59, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Gab (social network); that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. GorillaWarfare (talk) 16:00, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Your recent editing history at Gab (social network) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jorm (talk) 16:00, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Slatersteven (talk) 16:03, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for being disruptive and ignoring talk page messages. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Floquenbeam (talk) 16:31, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Blocked indef to stop ongoing disruption, until they post a convincing unblock request. I don't need to be consulted by the reviewing admin. --Floquenbeam (talk) 16:34, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
 * If I was considering unblocking (which I am not at the moment), I would prefer to give you a courtesy ping,, in the hope and expectation that you might have something insightful to say. I hope that's OK. Cullen328   Let's discuss it  03:27, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
 * I should have added "...but I don't mind being pinged; if I'm around, I'll reply." --Floquenbeam (talk) 14:02, 8 October 2020 (UTC)