User talk:OberyntheViper

Speedy deletion nomination of House of Nock
Hello OberyntheViper,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged House of Nock for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. SS13 (talk • contribs) 19:51, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

March 2015
Do not create, add, maintain, insert, or restore hoaxes on Wikipedia. Usually, hoaxes will be caught and marked for deletion shortly after they are created. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia – and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you. § FreeRangeFrog croak 01:25, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

November 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Leader of the Labour Party (UK) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:41, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Leader of the Labour Party (UK) was changed by OberyntheViper (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.887822 on 2015-11-02T11:41:19+00:00.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Rudolf Hess. Your edits continue to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:48, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Rudolf Hess was changed by OberyntheViper (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.893593 on 2015-11-02T11:48:03+00:00.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at One-child policy, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: One-child policy was changed by OberyntheViper (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.892976 on 2015-11-02T11:50:07+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:50, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

This is your final warning. You may be blocked from editing without further notice the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to King Edward VI College, Stourbridge. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 11:51, 2 November 2015 (UTC) You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. Materialscientist (talk) 12:08, 2 November 2015 (UTC)