User talk:Obi2canibe/archive9

I will usually reply on this page to messages posted here. Please add this page to your watchlist so that you know when I have replied. I make it a practice to add to my watchlist all talk pages that I post to &mdash; if I have posted on your talk page feel free to reply there.

Colombo Racecourse
Hello, I closed the AfD on this, and decided along the way to remove all the edits that related to the cut+paste sort-of move that was done. However, on closer inspection, it seems that we could potentially merge the edits in Colombo Racecourse that occurred after the c+p move into the edit history of Colombo Racecourse Airstrip since the latter was not edited in the meantime, save for administrative edits that we can remove. What do you think? Temporarily, I'm going to protect Colombo Racecourse Airstrip to prevent further potential problems. Splash - tk 22:47, 4 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks for encouraging further comment. My suggestion would be that we now rename Colombo Racecourse Airstrip to Colombo Racecourse to maintain the older edit history. We can then create a section (called Airstrip) in the new article that covers the temporary WW2 airstrip. Colombo Racecourse Airstrip should be retained as a redirect to the new title. Any merger of content/history would also be fine, I think, given new sections will need to be created anyway. We probably need a good summary on the article talk page so that future editors understand what happened with the AFD, renaming, reconstruction, etc. Stalwart 111  (talk) 23:06, 4 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Yes I agree - we should merge the edit history that took place after the c&p and then rename Colombo Racecourse Airstrip as Colombo Racecourse. Thank you both for your help.-- obi2canibe talk contr 18:59, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Thank you both. I've now done as suggested above, leaving all the administrative edits deleted as they would have produced overlapping edit histories to no purpose. However, I made a bit of a mess of the selective deletion/restoration required for this, so the logs for the articles are more complex than they should or need to be. Things are correct, nevertheless, I believe. I've put a note on Talk:Colombo Racecourse noting this, and the AfD, but I think it's not appropriate to put an oldafd there. Finally, I unprotected the now-redirected Colombo Racecourse Airstrip. Splash - tk 22:24, 5 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Looking good. A great collaborative result! Great work. Stalwart 111  (talk) 07:52, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

New message from Gareth Griffith-Jones
Gareth Griffith-Jones / The Welsh Buzzard 12:12, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Jan Jananayagam for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jan Jananayagam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jan Jananayagam until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Robofish (talk) 23:52, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ann Barnes (police commissioner), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tweet (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:53, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Namal Rajapaksa
I have cleaned up some of the problems in the article on Namal Rajapaksa. Please participate in the debate at Talk:Namal Rajapaksa before re-adding any content to it. Bjelleklang -  talk 20:33, 1 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Will do.-- obi2canibe talk contr 14:28, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

1958 riots in Ceylon
I have cleaned up some of the problems in the article on 1958 riots in Ceylon. Please participate in the debate at Talk:1958 riots in Ceylon before re-adding any content to it. --Disclosure07 (talk) 10:32, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

1958 riots in Ceylon
I have cleaned up some of the problems in the article on 1958 riots in Ceylon. Please participate in the debate at Talk:1958 riots in Ceylon before re-adding any content to it. --Disclosure07 (talk) 10:32, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Vandalism
Forgetting about the Indian Tamils is not vandalism. I don't need your improper accusations. Thanks. CaptainPrimo (talk) 20:53, 5 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Really? You forgot about 800,000 Tamils? Twice? Are you that anti-Tamil?-- obi2canibe talk contr 16:30, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Sri Lankan Civil War
Hello. You undo my contributions! What was your source? Talk to me before undoing anything. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shah-E-Zaman (talk • contribs) 05:59, 9 January 2013 (UTC)


 * As I stated on the edit summary, the content you added was not supported by references you gave. You stated "Tamil authories' Xenophobic behavior towards Muslims made it easy for Pakistan to choose the side of Sri Lankan Government" and supported this with a NYT article. The NYT article was about the massacre of Muslims by the LTTE, it had nothing about the Tamil authorities' xenophobic behaviour. You need to find a reference which explicitly supports your assertion that Tamil authorities' xenophobic behaviour led to Pakistani involvement in Sri Lanka. You stated that "In April 2009, Sri Lanka requested $25 million worth of 81 mm, 120 mm and 130 mm mortar ammunition to be delivered within a month" and supported this with a Wikipedia article. Wikipedia is not a reliable source, you will need to find a reliable source to support your assertion.


 * I have no doubt that Pakistan supported Sri Lanka during the civil war but you will have to find reliable sources to back you up.-- obi2canibe talk contr 21:35, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Notice of Dispute resolution discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute in which you may have been involved. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we are requesting your participation to help find a resolution. The thread is "Ethnic conflict_in_Sri_Lanka". {| style="border: 0; width: 100%;"
 * style="width: 50%; vertical-align: top;" |
 * style="width: 50%; vertical-align: top;" |

If you wish to open a DR/N filing, click the "Request dispute resolution" button below this guide or go to Dispute resolution noticeboard/request for an easy to follow, step by step request form.

What this noticeboard is:


 * It is an early step to resolve content disputes after talk page discussions have stalled. If it's something we can't help you with, or is too complex to resolve here, our volunteers will point you in the right direction.

What this noticeboard is not:


 * It is not a place to deal with the behavior of other editors. We deal with disputes about article content, not disputes about user conduct.
 * It is not a place to discuss disputes that are already under discussion at other dispute resolution forums.
 * It is not a substitute for the talk pages: the dispute must have been discussed extensively on a talk page (not just through edit summaries) before resorting to DRN.
 * It is not a court with judges or arbitrators that issue binding decisions: we focus on resolving disputes through consensus, compromise, and explanation of policy.

Things to remember:


 * Discussions should be civil, calm, concise, neutral, and objective. Comment only about the article's content, not the other editors.   Participants who go off-topic or become uncivil may be asked to leave the discussion.
 * Let the other editors know about the discussion by posting {{subst:drn-notice}} on their user talk page.
 * Sign and date your posts with four tildes " ".
 * If you ever need any help, ask one of our volunteers, who will help you as best as they can. You may also wish to read through the FAQ page located here and on the DR/N talkpage.

Please take a moment to review the simple guide and join the discussion. Thank you! EarwigBot   operator  /  talk 06:21, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks.-- obi2canibe talk contr 22:35, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

ITN for Impeachment of Shirani Bandaranayake
-- Spencer T♦ C 22:16, 14 January 2013 (UTC)


 * If you interested to include serious criticisms against the process you can refer this article. According to the schedule in parliament voted has done to reappoint a parliament committee again. Not to remove the chief justice. But speaker had interpret the vote had been done to remove CJ. But he doesn't have right to use a specific vote to interpret other thing .Also the vote to appoint commetee will deactivate previous PSC. WelupillaisOb (talk) 17:21, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka
Just a quick note that I'm about to be mostly off of WP for about a week, so if you need administrative eyes, you'll have to seek other help; if the edit warring continues, consider either asking for page protection or other help. Qwyrxian (talk) 05:40, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Notice of Dispute resolution discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute in which you may have been involved. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we are requesting your participation to help find a resolution. The thread is "Ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka". Himesh84 12:22, 15 January 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Himesh84 (talk • contribs)

Orphaned non-free media (File:UoJ logo.png)
Thanks for uploading File:UoJ logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:09, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Battle of the Greens (Panadura)
Hi, why is the redirect from Battle of the Greens (Panadura) leading to Panadura Royal College ? There is a bigmatch section in St. John's College, Panadura too ? Cossde (talk) 03:44, 3 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Why shouldn't it? Panadura Royal College was the first to have a section on the Big Match: 24 August 2012. It wasn' until 6 September 2012 that you created a section on St. John's College, Panadura. And have you forgotten that you requested that the contents of Battle of the Greens be merged into Panadura Royal College? The result of the discussion was merge but somehow you managed to twist that into making it a dab page. And, there is no rule that says "redirect can not be for a single school when both schools have two sections". You have just made this up to get your own way. Please grow up.-- obi2canibe talk contr 16:07, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The redirect should be to whichever article has clear information about the subject. Redirecting to a dab page that shouldn't even exist (I'll be deleting it in a moment, because we don't have a dab page unless there are 2 or more articles) is wrong; since the St. John's article has info, and the Panadrua Royal does not, that's the clearly better redirect. That is, I'm agreeing with Obi2canibe's edit, though not his rationale. Qwyrxian (talk) 23:31, 3 March 2013 (UTC)


 * OK. On your last point, I think you meant to say "since the Panadrua Royal article has info, and the St. John's does not".-- obi2canibe talk contr 18:13, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Qwyrxian has become newest Shepherd dog to cover up the dirty tactics done by Cossde:

Soon Panadura Royal College will be made Royal College Panadura on popular culture:  Royal College Panadura Google search -





Images for Royal College Panadura -

 Sock editing & Colombo Royalist Simple non complex version revealed:

Cossde Speedy deletion request per A7 - frenzied behavior - Speedy deletion request per A7. No indication of importance. Article does not give a credible indication of why the subject might be important or significant. Deletion attempts on Royal Colleges in Sri Lanka as follows:

 (1) Royal College Panadura closest to Colombo Royal College in Western Province, Sri Lanka - Big Match is called Battle of the Greens. Sri Lanka Test Cricketer Chamara Silva is an Old Royalist from Royal College Panadura.

 Attempts on Chamara Silva:



Chamara Silva - Old Royalist from Royal College Panadura



Deletion ttempt on Royal College Panadura:



Panadura Royal College: Difference between revisions 

 

(2) Royal College Wayamba, Kurunegala far away to Colombo Royal College - tough opposition Kurunegala was added to make Royal College Wayamba, Kurunegala

Deletion atempt on Royal College Wayamba, Kurunegala:<ul>

<li>

Royal College Wayamba, Kurunegala: Difference between revisions 

</li> </ul>

(3) Royal College Monaragala - Maithripala Sirisena is an Old Royalist from Royal College Monaragala

Deletion atempt on Royal College Monaragala:<ul>

<li>

Monaragala Royal College: Difference between revisions 

</li> </ul>

(4) Royal College Horana - closer to Colombo Royal College in Western Province, Sri Lanka.

Deletion atempt on Royal College Horana:<ul>

<li>

Horana Royal College: Difference between revisions 

</li> </ul>

(5) Royal College Kurunduwatta - Cinnamon Gardens Colombo 7 is also called Kurunduwatta.

Deletion atempt on Royal College Kurunduwatta:<ul>

<li>

Kurunduwatta Royal College: Difference between revisions 

</li> </ul>

(6) Royal College Telijjawila

Attempts on Royal College Telijjawila:<ul>

<li>

Rajakeeya Maha Vidyalaya, Telijjawila: Difference between revisions 

</li>

<li>

m (moved Royal College, Telijjawila to Rajakeeya Maha Vidyalaya -Telijjawila: Correct name) 

</li> </ul>

On another note related to continuoes removal of cited material by Cossde following will be included on related pages including Colombo Royal College:

References related to "Thurstan College Colombo 7" seperated only by a wall with Colombo Royal College:<ul>

<li>

</li>

<li>

</li> </ul>

Colombo Royalists Lalith Kotelawala, Pradeep Kariyawasam prestige is well known in Sri Lanka. Google search will reveal.

Like or dislike live with other Royalists in Sri Lanka.

Stupid Editor Colombo Royalist do not forget when you see us we see you too. If we are dum, you are dummer. Be prepared to have more arguments in the future.

This user is against Lies, corruption, nepotism and thuggery within governments.

Save Royal,Royalists from Colombo Royal College and Cossde action group (24.209.65.45 (talk) 08:13, 4 March 2013 (UTC)).

Plz see
User talk:103.247.48.129 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.247.50.137 (talk) 09:58, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 20:36, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Ethnic_conflict_in_Sri_Lanka
I have included your feedback (cc act, standardization, colonization (neutral word is land issue) and linked your comment as the source for the materials. Also I have removed factual accuracy tag after removing your list of  factual issues . Can you visit and tell me whether it is ok now ? --Himesh84 (talk) 15:37, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Pradeshiya Sabhas of Sri Lanka
Hi, I have created this template Template:Pradeshiya Sabhas of Sri Lanka but I have not been able to finish it. You have a greater knowledge of topics related to this so would you mind finishing this list? Thanks. :)--Blackknight12 (talk) 14:23, 21 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Done. I have split into provinces for easier navigation.-- obi2canibe talk contr 22:57, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Great work. Thanks--Blackknight12 (talk) 02:18, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Tamil Eelam Template
I've just made a duplicate of the WPTE Template with the following title:Template:User WP Tamil Eelam and added them both to the Category:Regional WikiProject user templates.

I feel the older one can redirect to this and for that I feel I should have someone of your own's opinion, what's your take?I don't intend to disturb the Project by going on with the move.Or if you probably think its not broken to fix, I'd be glad to delete the other one then.Thank you.

CuCl2


 * There's no issue with calling the template User WP Tamil Eelam but you should really have asked for Template:User WPTE to be moved to Template:User WP Tamil Eelam rather than create the template afresh. This preserves edit history. I have corrected.-- obi2canibe talk contr 21:32, 23 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Thanks, I intended to merge the very same.Just thought of clarifying whether it would be alright to do so or whether the new template was unnecessary.

--CuCl2 06:25, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Grossly inappropriate material
Please stop adding "Islamophobia" tags to the article about the Sri Lanka Buddhist organization. See WP:TERRORIST and Original_research. Wikipedia pieces need to be neutral and encyclopedic in tone. If you want to add criticism, it must be in its own section and properly sourced. 115.84.79.166 (talk) 05:53, 8 April 2013 (UTC)


 * All of my contributions were properly sourced. I suggest you stop trying to censor Wikipedia.-- obi2canibe talk contr 15:28, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Factual issues in Sri Lankan Tamils, Jaffna Kingdom pages
I went to above pages. Most of the things are factual issues. Most of the things are in the resources talking about Tamils. But references are not clearly pointing to Sri Lankan Tamils. As you know there are several Tamil ethnics in SL. So you better use your time to improve that document. Otherwise I will have to check where SL Tamils not linked and remove them. --Himesh84 (talk) 08:31, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Jaffna subrbs
Jaffna

I have reverted your list of suburbs from the Jaffna article for the second time. It is necessary and it doesn't take up much space. The claims for its removal are ambiguous and ill-defined. It's quite appropriate to make acknowledgement of suburbs in a Wikipedia city article. It's quite a common sense inclusion of data. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Psef2234 (talk • contribs) 09:56, 29 April 2013 (UTC)