User talk:Object 490

Welcome!
Hello, Object 490, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Royal Air Force did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to  The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Introduction tutorial
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. Favonian (talk) 08:42, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Xaxxaxaxaxaxxa Object 490 (talk) 19:46, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

RAF
Hi, just wanted to ask why you belive the RAF is the "second" oldest air force? Which one would therefore be the oldest? And do you have a source to support that? Thanks - wolf  12:14, 22 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The finnish air force was formed before the RAF fact proven in documents Object 490 (talk) 19:44, 22 January 2021 (UTC)


 * In which case please post your proposed change on the article talk page and provide a citation as required by WP:CITE and WP:RS. Dormskirk (talk) 21:31, 22 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Oh ffs Object 490 (talk) 09:09, 23 January 2021 (UTC)


 * No need to get upset. Surely you understand that content here has to be supported, no? Otherwise, anyone could just post any random BS they wanted (not saying that's you're doing btw). Without sourcing, Wikipedia wouldn't exist. (p.s. see wp:indent) - wolf  17:23, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

True also im too lazy to talk anything over with others so i do suggest that you do your research and then make sure that i know which one of us is correct Object 490 (talk) 22:40, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

January 2021
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Royal Air Force; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Favonian (talk) 13:16, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.