User talk:Obroak

November 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Non è un mistero (Lorenzo Cappiello (EP) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Say Headcheese!-- hexa Chord 2  21:23, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lorenzo Cappiello
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Lorenzo Cappiello, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * Does not meet inclusion requirements at WP:MUSIC

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. --fvw *  16:13, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

December 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. J.delanoy gabs adds 16:24, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. J.delanoy gabs adds 16:36, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Failed verification
The references you cite in Non è un mistero ALL fail verification, meaning that neither the name of this EP NOR the artist (Lorenzo Cappiello) appear in ANY of the citations. One failed citation would be a mistake, two would be shoddy work. 19 failed verifications is vandalism. Continuation to do so will be reported. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:08, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I have noted that you have removed the failed citations. However, with no new references to back up your claims, the article still lacks verifiability.  Such grandiose claims need to be backed up with citations, or removed for lack of verifiability.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 20:13, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:11, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

You have been accused of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Suspected sock puppets/Obroak. Thank you. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:39, 8 December 2008 (UTC)


 * I've extended the block to two weeks per WP:SSP. The pages you have re-created have been salted. Any further attempt will result in this account being disabled indefinitely. seicer  &#x007C;  talk  &#x007C;  contribs  14:19, 9 December 2008 (UTC)