User talk:ObserveOwl/Archive/2021-2023

Please declare your main account
Hi there. You are obviously not a new editor to Wikipedia. Can you please declare what your main account is? -- Guerillero Parlez Moi 00:50, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
 * I have another account, but I don't want to reveal it because the account name is my real name. I sent an email to the Arbitration Committee writing that I didn't want to use an account with my name. They answered that I could make a clean start. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-Bor-uEvshuIYH5vLppXYQM_f4QzSlx3/view?usp=drivesdk ObserveOwl (talk) 10:57, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

Maus
If I revert again, I will be on a 3RR vio. So it would be better if you would do it please? --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 12:50, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
 * I've sent a message on the unregistered user's talk page instead. ObserveOwl (talk) 14:47, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you. The IP address has been bouncing about, so I don't really expect that to work unless you are lucky to catch them while active. They haven't engaged with talk:Maus. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 17:54, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
 * It has been a day since I've edited his talk page, so I reverted that edit and two other edits I found problematic. ObserveOwl (talk) 16:25, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
 * another unregistered editor thinks it is "hiding"... Should the article be protected? ObserveOwl (talk) 06:33, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Makes sense, at least for a week or so. I assume you know about wp:request for page protection. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 11:15, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

I see we both did the same RPP. I got in first but I see no reason why you can't add your remarks to support my request? --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 17:53, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

DYK for The Password Game
—Kusma (talk) 00:03, 20 July 2023 (UTC) GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:28, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Saw this on DYK and had to check the game out. One of the best small games I've played since Wordle came out- thanks for writing this article and getting it on DYK, it's a fantastic game and I'm glad you put it out there. MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 01:18, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Hey, thanks for your kind words. I became quite surprised how my work has been noticed; an experienced editor even used the thank tool on the article's creation edit. It's always very nice to see the support I receive for the time I spend here, especially on my talk page. (Also, that's the first enwiki article I've published. Face-smile.svg ) ObserveOwl (talk) 14:30, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

The Password Game
Do you intend to bring it to GA? - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 04:12, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Hm. I haven't been caring much about the article lately, except for some occasional visits to the edit history to see if anyone vandalized it. It once came across to me that it had some potential for GA, but since English is my third language, I feel quite insecure about the way I write. (I am the author of the majority of the article. ) This made me question whether it complies with GA criteria 1a ("well-written"). Also, the two paragraphs in the gameplay section have a large difference in size, which feels a bit wrong... but I can't come up with a better way of writing it.
 * Since I can't assess what I wrote with absolute certainty, I have to ask: do you think the article is close to meeting the GA criteria? ObserveOwl (chit-chat • my doings) 06:39, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Oh, I have no idea. I just had the idea of writing the article, but saw you wrote it already. If you want, I can do a copyedit and nominate it as a co-nomination between the two of us sometime. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 07:16, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the delay. I'd be glad if you do a copyedit; feel free to make any major changes if needed. ObserveOwl (chit-chat • my doings) 09:40, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Sure thing. Also, I'm not certain about applying the free license to the screenshot; while it is just text, I believe that the format of the page is still copyrighted. Either way, I'm going to try a different screenshot. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 13:42, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
 * @Cukie Gherkin The original screenshot has a license confirmed by Neal Agarwal himself - see the file page, it has an OTRS ticket. This means that Agarwal sent an email to Commons' Volunteer Response Team confirming that the screenshot is under the CC BY-SA 4.0, so it is not copyrighted. I'm sorry, but I might have to restore the original screenshot and speedy delete the fair use one. ObserveOwl (chit-chat • my doings) 16:18, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
 * I see, thank you for the clarification. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 16:20, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

Your copyedits have been very helpful, thank you. Mind if I nominate it tomorrow (in 12 hours or so) ? There's an ongoing GAN Backlog Drive until the end of this month and many people are currently reviewing nominations, so it could be a good idea to nominate it before September. I'll be reading the nomination instructions today before sleeping. ObserveOwl (chit-chat • my doings) 21:04, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Okay, I've read the instructions and analysed the criteria, and I already feel confident enough to put the GAN template on the talk page. (You will also be allowed to respond to the reviewer's suggestions.) ObserveOwl (chit-chat • my doings) 23:10, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
 * wow, the article barely passes the minimum prose size requirement of 800 words for the drive - with 801 words ObserveOwl (chit-chat • my doings) 23:20, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Password Game
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Password Game you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kung Fu Man -- Kung Fu Man (talk) 15:42, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Password Game
The article The Password Game you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Password Game for comments about the article, and Talk:The Password Game/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kung Fu Man -- Kung Fu Man (talk) 18:22, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sarah McCreanor has been accepted
 Sarah McCreanor, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer. If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Sarah_McCreanor help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider. Thanks again, and happy editing! ––– GMH Melbourne (talk) 08:15, 11 December 2023 (UTC)