User talk:Observer42436

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page:. Euryalus (talk) 10:57, 15 May 2023 (UTC) Some licence is given for people to express personal opinions, but Wikipedia is not the place to advocate for distigmatising pedophilia. Your account has been blocked per this policy. -- Euryalus (talk) 10:57, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
 * This is a gross misapplication of that policy. It says "advocate inappropriate adult–child relationships" and "expressing the view that inappropriate relationships are not harmful to children" which is very much not what this user has done. They specifically spoke of pedophiles getting help before such a thing could occur. I am becoming very concerned about the way in which this whole situation is unfolding. --Pokelova (talk) 11:04, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
 * The editor behind this throwaway account is free to lodge an unblock request if they disagree with the block. -- Euryalus (talk) 11:10, 15 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Can I make a suggestion? If you're a professional and you believe that a different approach to pedophilia which doesn't involve stigma is needed, then Wikipedia is absolutely not the place to try to push that - and arguing for a more pedophile-friendly approach is probably not the best way to be unblocked. Wikipedia (as an encyclopedia) reflects the current state of a topic, and doesn't try to change it. So if society is hostile towards pedophiles and stigmatizes them, and you want to change that, you need to do it elsewhere rather than here. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:51, 15 May 2023 (UTC)