User talk:Observer900

Recent edit to Clandon Park
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Clandon Park, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 08:45, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

March 2016
Please do not add or change content, as you did at New Buckenham, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Charles (talk) 20:30, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at New Buckenham, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Charles (talk) 22:50, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to New Buckenham. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Charles (talk) 10:02, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to New Buckenham. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi  10:20, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi  10:25, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 12:22, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

March 2016
Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on User talk:Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi. Thank you. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi  12:22, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at New Buckenham shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.''Normally you would be blocked from editing at this point, but you did not receive a formal warning about edit warring. This is that warning, so do not violate this hard and fast rule again. '' Katietalk 18:45, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Old- / New- / Buckenham / -Castle

 * 8 December 1455: The earl of Salisbury was part of a group complaining that they have been ‘thrust out’ of Buckenham manor, castle, and hundred by the royal escheator ‘which unlawfully remained in the king’s hands,’ as, they say, was proved in court; and so they are claiming to be put in possession again. "Calendar of Close Rolls 1454-61," 91.


 * THE PRIORY OF OLD BUCKENHAM, A History of the County of Norfolk: Volume 2 Victoria County History, London, 1906


 * Map of Buckenham c. late 188os.- Think this image is probably copyrighted to BHO; you'd probably need your own from the original O/S. Check with some c/r bods on WP though.


 * Buckenham Priory and manor, An Essay Towards A Topographical History of the County of Norfolk: Volume 10, London, 1809.


 * Buckenham Old + New, A Topographical Dictionary of England, London, 1848.

Talkback
Sorry about the very slow reply! DBaK (talk) 23:18, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

March 2016
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi  14:24, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Please assume good faith in your dealings with other editors, which you did not on User talk:NR16NB. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi  12:24, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

New Buckenham
(In reply to "hello, as a matter of general interest to everybody could you please let us know what are your credentials for knowing anything about New Buckenham, thanks. Observer900 (talk) 08:53, 28 April 2016 (UTC)")

Only secondary sources, so if you're local, please check all statements carefully and thank you in advance. There's not much of about it at the moment: no reference for the "Planned Town" section, nothing on Governance, Landscape, History, Amenities (schools, churches, shopping, transport). Bit of a wreck, really. If you're up for tackling it, you might find it useful to read over pages for a few other places nearby. Woodbridge, Suffolk is a good one, I think. Alburgh I worked on but it was a bit of an uphill struggle. There's been some argument over Southwold (not with me, and mainly about the lighthouse), but the page at the moment reads well and certainly has a lot of information. So has Aldeburgh. Heacham has worked out, I think. Still, those are bigger places. See what you think of Car Colston and Flimby, further afield. Brian Bmcln1 (talk) 09:43, 28 April 2016 (UTC)