User talk:Obuckeyes48

September 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Alan B. Krueger. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Rostz (talk) 21:05, 10 September 2011 (UTC)

Edit warring
Please review WP:EW, WP:SPA, and WP:SOCK, since your edits appear to be similar to those of User:43235Guy (contribs) that were reverted by several editors.

Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of edit warring&#32; after a review of the reverts you have made on Alan B. Krueger. Users are expected to collaborate and discuss with others and avoid editing disruptively. Please be particularly aware, the three-revert rule states that: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Rostz (talk) 22:01, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Alan B. Krueger, you may be blocked from editing. Rostz (talk) 03:16, 22 September 2011 (UTC)