User talk:Ocatecir/Archive2

Bam's Unholy Union
No problem dude! Steve 04:28, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

CKY user template
I love the cky user template, really do, but I think it might fall foul of the fair use guidelines to use a copyrighted logo in templates / userspace... thats what stopped me making this template or adding the logo to the project template. Obviously, the world isn't grinding to a halt on account of this issue...  Dei zio  talk 15:21, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Absolutely.. but like I say, the world aint gonna end if you haven't got time right now ;)  Dei zio  talk 15:40, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof!
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Ocatecir! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Prodego talk  23:07, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Warning templates
Thanks for helping out with reverting vandals. One thing I noticed is that when you have been leaving a warning template on the vandal's Talk page, you are not  subst:  the templates. You'll want to substitute all the warning templates that you issue. Thanks again for helping out. =) -- Gogo Dodo 05:42, 19 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Re your message: The  subst:  command takes a copy of the warning template and inserts it into the Talk page instead of transcluding the message. It's done for a couple of reasons.  See Template substitution for details.  So if you warn somebody you would write something like Wikipedia:Sandbox . -- Gogo Dodo 05:50, 19 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Re your message: Thanks again for helping out. Don't worry about the previous warnings you have issued.  There is a bot that will go around and fix them. =) -- Gogo Dodo 05:57, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I have the same problem.. but that bot just takes care of it :)  Dei z  talk 09:04, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Fausto Vitello's photo
Is the photo is under GNU license - could it be published on Commons? Very good article by the way!--KoRnholio8 08:42, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The photo was released by the family after his death. I think they would have to release it for use on the commons. &mdash; O cat ecir  Talk  09:43, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Is there a website or other document that confirms it? Then it could easily go anywhere..  Dei z  talk 09:58, 22 February 2007 (UTC)