User talk:Ocatecir/Archive5

Adminship
If you ever fancy a shot you realize I demand to be your nominator :)  Dei z  talk 06:20, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The first thing to consider is if there is anything out there that would count against you - incivility, silly mistakes etc.. I haven't seen anything of that nature, but if you have any diffs you're not proud of it's always good to address them. If you continue to participate in XfDs and RfAs (not sure if you've got involved in the latter or not) and community affairs in general, report/fix vandalism, write articles and make good edits you should be OK. The main reasons AfDs are contested are not enough experience in important areas, no need for the tools, inability to work together, bad attitude. Not being a hardcore Wiki insider or not undergoing ed review usually isn't a problem if the other areas check out.  Dei z  talk 09:53, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Better source request for Image:Pontiuswedding.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Pontiuswedding.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talkpage. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 18:46, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Requested that image be deleted as new fair use image is introduced. If I ever get the chance I will take my own picture of pontius and upload to WP to avoid having to utilize fair use. &mdash; O cat ecir  Talk  09:25, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

George W. Downs reference?
Hi, and thanks for your edit to George W. Downs. Do you have a verifiable citation for the NYU Dean being the son of the subject of this article? It certainly seems plausable given the names, but I don't see anything on the web page you referenced which is verifiable evidence of this. Verifiability is particularly important with biographical articles about living people. -- RoySmith (talk) 13:00, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Removed reference until verification can be found. &mdash; O cat ecir  Talk  08:37, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Howard Stern EL's
Please use the talk page instead of just reverting. It's a mature article that's been fairly stable. I think you're being too strict on WP:EL in this case and would like some other ed's input. LilDice 23:58, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I didn't think the talk page was necessary as Wikipedia has a clear policy about bulletin boards in the External links. This is a matter of Wikipedia policy, not editor opinion. Also, because an article is "stable" does not mean that the article cannot be edited. &mdash; O cat ecir  Talk  04:41, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

User Page
Can you give suggestions to my user page(this was random) The Phoenix Enforcer (Talk to me)  16:56, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Three words: Less is more. I think more experienced editors will agree that the more userboxes and misc junk a userpage has, the less a visitor will read them/care. Consider using subpages as well to organize your information. &mdash; O cat ecir  Talk  02:48, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Heads-up on VT talk page
As a courtesy, this is just to let you know there is a section explaining rationale behind removal on the main article body of the VT massacre/shootings so that you aren't caught unaware of the mention of your name on the talk page.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Virginia_Tech_massacre#Reasons_for_removal_explained

Dsf 02:02, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks, but in the future if you are going to write a message to only one editor, use that editor's talk page. I removed my name from the section heading as it was not appropriate. As far as that section goes, you are right wikipedia is not a news service and it is not important to have it up right away so I will not re-add it. Deiz's essay WP:CHILL is good to follow in times like these. &mdash; O cat ecir  Talk  02:09, 17 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Fair enough; my apologies and thanks. Dsf 02:12, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

RE: Lebanese Bands
I started an article on wikipedia that you considered as advertisement and vandalism and so on. I appreciate the time you put in ensuring wikipedia doesn't become an advertisement tool. but I want to tell you that I have no interest in the Lebanesebands.com website. the reason why I did the article about this website is : - The website is one of the most active lebanon based websites in Lebanon - It is home for the lebanese underground bands - the forum in Lebbands.com is a web community for Metal fans (and Metal is mostly banned in Lebanon)

Now if I think about it again all these things might not br relevant enough to go in an Encyclopedia but I see similar articles for little websites and web-communities in the U.S.A and the U.K

Anyway if you reply to me I might work more on the article and post it again but seriously i was frustrated when you deleted my work twice anyway thank you

thank you for your reply --Six 7 8 20:16, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I did not delete the article, I tagged it as an advertisement so that an administrator could take a look at it and confirm that it met the criteria as an advertisement article. That administrator obviously agreed. If you could source it with more independent reliable third party works to establish notability and remove the advertising language and cruft it would be able to stand as a valuable article. &mdash; O cat ecir  Talk  09:01, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

UN
If there's a privacy issue involved, and you make a note of that on your userpage, nobody should have a problem with it. If there could be a perception that you're hiding from problems you caused for yourself, it might be construed negatively. Serious editors will recognize a valid reason when they see one. I recall when Malthusian changed his username to Sam Blanning right around the time of his RfA, he made a note of that in his signature ("Sam Blanning - formerly Malthusian") for maybe a month or so.  Dei z  talk 08:48, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
 * He's been given a week, bring any further problems after that straight to me.  Dei z  talk 04:24, 30 April 2007 (UTC)