User talk:Ocatli

Speedy deletion nomination of Ben shabaz
Hello Ocatli,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Ben shabaz for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, → Σ σ  ς. 02:35, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

September 2012
Hello, I'm Acroterion. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions to Prince Fielder because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks!  Acroterion   (talk)   03:12, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Bleach, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dawnseeker2000  03:13, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Prince Fielder with this edit, you may be blocked from editing.  elektrik SHOOS  (talk) 03:14, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Pronoun.  elektrik SHOOS  (talk) 03:16, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

Please stop introducing jokes into articles, such as those you created at Prince Fielder. Wikipedia is a serious encyclopedia, and contributions of this type are considered vandalism. Continuing to add jokes and other disruptive content into articles may lead to you being blocked from editing. Zepppep (talk) 03:45, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ben shabaz


A tag has been placed on Ben shabaz requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Shirt58 (talk) 03:32, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Dreadstar ☥   03:53, 15 September 2012 (UTC)